Apolyton Archive  |  Preserved copy of the Apolyton Civilization Site and its forums as they stood in September 2005. Read-only; nothing here can be posted to or replied to.  |  Forum index |  About this archive |  The 1998–2001 UBB forums
Today on Apolyton WARDELL INTERVIEW PROMO A.C.S. HISTORY CHAPTER 4 GET CIV4 /w FREE PLUS! A.C.S. PHOTO GALLERY GET A.O.M. V1.1
Apolyton Civilization Forums
main| civ2| civ3| civ4| smac| ctp2| ron| moo3| galciv| galciv2| alt| about|
ApolytonPLUS | register | search | faq | new posts | pm (-/-) | upload | members
hall of fame new! | civgroups | civgroups news | interviews | the column | radio | chat | directory | news | store | PLUS
Apolyton Civilization Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.0.3 Apolyton Civilization Forums > Miscellaneous > Archive > Off-Topic-Archive > Whatever is wrong with #2: Calling it a War for Oil
Show a Printable Version | Email This Page to Someone! | Receive updates to this thread | Report this to Apolyton news!

bottom of page
  
Author
Thread   
Pages (7): [ 1   2   3   4   5   6     >> ]
< Last Thread     Next Thread > Post New Thread     Post A Reply
Comrade Tribune is offline Comrade Tribune
Prince
Vienna, Austria
Nov 1999
time: 06:26
  Old Post 26-02-2003 06:57
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#61 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations

quote:
Originally posted by MichaeltheGreat
...but it takes more than ideology to explain the almost single-minded obsession with Saddam that these people have.


Yes, again, but you, shall we say, overlook, geography.

After force-vassalizing Iraq, it will be so much easier to force-vassalize Syria, then Iran,...

As I said, this is either a mad world conquest scheme, or a creepy 'Kill-all-enemies-of-Israel' scheme.

Very unsavoury, one way or other.

GePap is offline GePap
King
of the Big Apple
Nov 2001
time: 23:26
  Old Post 26-02-2003 06:57
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#62 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

Having experienced some of the stuff that lead up to the invasion of Panama, I can say that Noriega was not helping himself a lot by threatening US citizens and all his nutty pronouncements.

But war is one of those things were scale does matter: after all, the US has had a whole cnetury of experience getting involved in Central America and the Caribbean. War in Iraq is on a whole different level than the local excersises the US used to carry out in the neighborhood.

I think if these folks are fixated on Iraq (which they are) it is because they sort of came of age during that time. It was the first crisis of the New World Order.

MOBIUS is offline MOBIUS
King
Prifysgol Caerdydd
Dec 1999
time: 15:26
  Old Post 26-02-2003 07:05 Visit MOBIUS's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#63 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization: The Boardgame

If the Bush administration could seize the presidency through a blatantly rigged election coup, why should we believe them when they say it's not for oil?

Personally I think the anti Kyoto powers that be (that are up to their armpits in oil and weapons links and tainted money) are just ringfencing their oil supplies for the future when the rest of the world really starts to get serious about global warming and tries to cut back world oil usage...

GePap is offline GePap
King
of the Big Apple
Nov 2001
time: 23:26
  Old Post 26-02-2003 07:09
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#64 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, pre-order Civilization IV

If this war were for Oil, it would have happend already! If the goal were so obviously a selfish one, then why the hell go to the UN, try to build a cooalition of any type, so forth and so on? The US can win militarilly without anyone else, so why all the other stuff?

Aren't there any other malicious or dangerous reasons for war that you could imagine?

MOBIUS is offline MOBIUS
King
Prifysgol Caerdydd
Dec 1999
time: 15:26
  Old Post 26-02-2003 07:26 Visit MOBIUS's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#65 Report this post to a moderator
Tired of ads?

If Blair wasn't Bush's ally, they would have launched the war already - Blair has been the only one holding Bush back, because he has the President's ear. Blair is smart enough to realise that the US should be at least seen to be 'playing the game', whereas Bush wanted to do exactly what you were questioning...

There is a vote in the house of commons about going to war with Saddam tomorrow I think that could see a significant mutiny in the Labour - it will be interesting to see what happens if Blair loses that vote...

Saddam has no links with Al Qaeda - so no problems there. In fact, I would say the disintegration of Saddam's power during a US attack might be the very catalyst for WOMD to get into Al Qaeda hands as the guards of any WOMD dumps seek to get out and sell these things to Al Qaeda...

As for the 'moral argument', I'll accept that when I see the US stopping its support of all the dictatorships it's propping up with money and weapons...

So, I see only two reasons: Oil, or plain opportunistic hatred.

GePap is offline GePap
King
of the Big Apple
Nov 2001
time: 23:26
  Old Post 26-02-2003 07:37
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#66 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations

Well then, you have missed the actual reason: ideology and a new view of how the US should use its power.

MOBIUS is offline MOBIUS
King
Prifysgol Caerdydd
Dec 1999
time: 15:26
  Old Post 26-02-2003 07:41 Visit MOBIUS's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#67 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization 2

I could have sworn I covered those...

Oil and opportunistic hatred.

Sorry, I thought I had made myself clear...

Ramo is offline Ramo
King
Austin, Texas, USA
Oct 1999
time: 23:26
  Old Post 26-02-2003 07:46 Visit Ramo's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#68 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Alpha Centauri

It is about oil. It's not entirely about oil, or even mostly about oil (I'd say oil is the tertiary reason for war), but it's silly to think oil hasn't entered into the picture. It's not that the US wants access to Iraq's oil, but it wants control over it. Iraq has a huge oil reserve, and if US gains control over this reserve, it gains significant leverage over other states.

What the war is primarily about is to maintain Shrub's authority within the US and to maintain the US' authority around the world. Saddam's a fairly easy target, hated within and outside of Iraq, is a former American client who has defied our authority, so the US wants to take him out to get Iraq back in line and give other states something to think about before defying the US.

Sava is offline Sava
King
GO GO GO!
Mar 2001
time: 23:26
  Old Post 26-02-2003 07:48
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#69 Report this post to a moderator
Re: Re: Whatever is wrong with #2: Calling it a War for Oil Suffering from ads?

quote:
Originally posted by DinoDoc

War for oil doesn't make any sense. Remove the sanctions and Baghdad would be over joyed to sell the stuff to us.

Sanctions don't seem to matter to some Americans. Dic Cheney and Haliburton made 73 million selling oil equipment to Iraq in 2000. Real patriotic, eh? The Bush admin are a bunch of wh0res.

Ned is offline Ned
Prince
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999
time: 21:26
  Old Post 26-02-2003 07:56
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#70 Report this post to a moderator
Inflate your Upload Space

quote:
Originally posted by Trajanus


Gigantic armies... armies of no worth you mean... on top of that the morale of the regular troops is so low they will hardly fight anyway, at least with the absolutely crappy equipment they have..

Also all his wars up till now were not a success, which already shows that he is an incapable stupid moron.. the war on Iraq for example was a fiasco! Against the advice of his officers he made decisions that proved desastrous to the Iraqis...

Clearly he is a bad military leader and I for one wouldn't fear him too much... A big army doesn't necessarily mean it's a good one


In '91, the Iraqi army had older Soviet equiment that could not compete with modern American, or for that matter, European arms. For example, our tanks could begin to engage Saddam's tanks at 2 miles, while the max range of Saddam's tanks was 1 mile.

But with France and Germany as willing arms suppliers, Saddam could equip his forces with technology on a par with our own and probably far superior to any of his neighbors execpt the Israeli's.

MichaeltheGreat is offline MichaeltheGreat
Apolyton Grand Executioner
mooning the house that Ruth built.
Oct 1999
time: 21:26
  Old Post 26-02-2003 07:59
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#71 Report this post to a moderator
Lose 30 kilos (of popups)

There's no problem (with appropriate regulatory clearance) selling stuff to Iraq under the sanctions regime - the problem is buying from Iraq.

It also depends on what you sell - since Iraq is authorized to sell certain amounts of oil under the oil for food program, selling oil drilling and oilfield maintenance stuff is also OK under the sanctions rules.

MOBIUS - how did Bush steal the election again? Gore had the two term VP incumbency, a strong economy, and a moron of an opponent, and the biggest funding level of any Democrat candidate ever. For Bush to even have been in the position where a few hundred Florida votes meant anything, Gore had to have given away the show in the first place.

Sava is offline Sava
King
GO GO GO!
Mar 2001
time: 23:26
  Old Post 26-02-2003 08:04
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#72 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization III: Complete

That's right... it's okay to get rich selling oil equipment. In fact, it's unpatriotic if you don't give Saddam Hussein the means to reap billions in oil revenue

Ned is offline Ned
Prince
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999
time: 21:26
  Old Post 26-02-2003 08:04
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#73 Report this post to a moderator
Put an end to popups!

Comrad Tribun, I am one to admit that Israel factors into our thinking. I believe they are justifiably concerned about Saddam. That makes many Americans concerned about Iraq, even if we are not Jewish, because we support Israel.

Sava is offline Sava
King
GO GO GO!
Mar 2001
time: 23:26
  Old Post 26-02-2003 08:06
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#74 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Call to Power 2

That's right... we are only attacking Iraq because there is a liberal Jewish conspiracy!

MichaeltheGreat is offline MichaeltheGreat
Apolyton Grand Executioner
mooning the house that Ruth built.
Oct 1999
time: 21:26
  Old Post 26-02-2003 08:07
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#75 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Call to Power 2

quote:
Originally posted by Ned


In '91, the Iraqi army had older Soviet equiment that could not compete with modern American, or for that matter, European arms. For example, our tanks could begin to engage Saddam's tanks at 2 miles, while the max range of Saddam's tanks was 1 mile.


Both of which were meaningless, as battlefield visibility conditions had engagements occuring frequently at 1000-1500 meters, and the only straight-up fighting at that range was Bradleys against T-72s.

quote:

But with France and Germany as willing arms suppliers, Saddam could equip his forces with technology on a par with our own and probably far superior to any of his neighbors execpt the Israeli's.


Both Kuwait and Saudi Arabia have export version Abrams tanks. The French don't have anything similar, and IIRC, the Germans haven't exported their higher end Leopards, etc. (with that beautiful Rheinmetall gun) outside of NATO.

The basic problem, even if Saddam had all the money, and all the willing suppliers, is that Iraqi doctrine is way too dated, too top-down, and too static. For the Iraqi military to be a threat, they'd have to start sending their officers to the NTC, to CGSC, and to the AWC program, like our Saudi and Kuwaiti allies get to do.

It would take Saddam years, probably on the order of a decade, to get his army in decent shape to be a real threat, if he had unlimited access to everything.

MichaeltheGreat is offline MichaeltheGreat
Apolyton Grand Executioner
mooning the house that Ruth built.
Oct 1999
time: 21:26
  Old Post 26-02-2003 08:08
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#76 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization III: Complete

quote:
Originally posted by Sava
That's right... it's okay to get rich selling oil equipment. In fact, it's unpatriotic if you don't give Saddam Hussein the means to reap billions in oil revenue


Saddam is authorized to reap a few billion in oil revenue. He's supposed to spend it on food, medicines, and humanitarian supplies, though.

MOBIUS is offline MOBIUS
King
Prifysgol Caerdydd
Dec 1999
time: 15:26
  Old Post 26-02-2003 08:09 Visit MOBIUS's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#77 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Call to Power 2

quote:
Originally posted by MichaeltheGreat
MOBIUS - how did Bush steal the election again? Gore had the two term VP incumbency, a strong economy, and a moron of an opponent, and the biggest funding level of any Democrat candidate ever. For Bush to even have been in the position where a few hundred Florida votes meant anything, Gore had to have given away the show in the first place.


You're right that Gore squandered a big lead, then there's Ralph Nader as well - but what Bush's family and supporters did in by mitigating ten of thousands of votes in Florida and got away with defies belief!

That is what tipped the scales.

The worst thing is that they did just enough to get lucky...

Sava is offline Sava
King
GO GO GO!
Mar 2001
time: 23:26
  Old Post 26-02-2003 08:09
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#78 Report this post to a moderator
Full PM-box? Change here!

Yeah, and supplying dangerous weapons to Iraq is our job... BOYCOTT FRANCE!

Comrade Tribune is offline Comrade Tribune
Prince
Vienna, Austria
Nov 1999
time: 06:26
Smile  Old Post 26-02-2003 08:23
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#79 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

quote:
Originally posted by Ned
That makes many Americans concerned about Iraq, even if we are not Jewish, because we support Israel.


Yeah, but did you ever ask yourself, *why* you do that?

Because they ignore UN resolutions by the scores, instead of just one or two, like Iraq?

Because they are the last true Apartheid state in the world?

Because routinely assassinating political enemies is cool?

Because Israel is such a good friend of the United States, who did for you, what, exactly?

Just because?

The Vagabond is offline The Vagabond
Chieftain
of realpolitik and counterpropaganda
Jan 1970
time: 05:26
  Old Post 26-02-2003 08:24
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#80 Report this post to a moderator
Re: Re: Whatever is wrong with #2: Calling it a War for Oil Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition

quote:
Originally posted by DinoDoc
War for oil doesn't make any sense. Remove the sanctions and Baghdad would be over joyed to sell the stuff to us.


It's not the first time I see you to repeat this faulty argument, DinoDoc. Iraq would also be overjoyed to sell you Kuwaiti oil after it captured Kuwait. Yet for some reason you had to liberate Kuwait for the sake of oil.

This war is first of all for power, and in this respect it may be important for the survival of the US. Oil is close second. WMD, if any, are distant third.

Sava is offline Sava
King
GO GO GO!
Mar 2001
time: 23:26
  Old Post 26-02-2003 08:24
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#81 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization: The Boardgame

So in order to punish Iraq for ignoring the UN, we're going to ignore the UN and attack!

Comrade Tribune is offline Comrade Tribune
Prince
Vienna, Austria
Nov 1999
time: 06:26
Post  Old Post 26-02-2003 08:25
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#82 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

quote:
Originally posted by Sava
That's right... we are only attacking Iraq because there is a liberal Jewish conspiracy!


It´s neocon, not liberal; not that I think ideology really matters to the people involved.

Comrade Tribune is offline Comrade Tribune
Prince
Vienna, Austria
Nov 1999
time: 06:26
  Old Post 26-02-2003 08:29
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#83 Report this post to a moderator
Re: Re: Re: Whatever is wrong with #2: Calling it a War for Oil Put an end to popups!

quote:
Originally posted by The Vagabond
This war is first of all for power, and in this respect it may be important for the survival of the US.


Sounds eerily like Hitler. He always mumbled about survival, too, while threatening the national survival of *everybody else*.

The Bush Lobby is sure a worthy case for a new Nuremberg.

Sava is offline Sava
King
GO GO GO!
Mar 2001
time: 23:26
  Old Post 26-02-2003 08:29
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#84 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations

Iraq already tried to build an empire, build and proliferate WoMD's, bully other countries... pretty soon they'd start assassinating foreign leaders and propping up puppet regimes. That's our job! WE have to stop them111111111

DinoDoc is offline DinoDoc
Emperor
AECCP loves Democracy
Sep 1999
time: 23:26
Question  Old Post 26-02-2003 08:32
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#85 Report this post to a moderator
Help yourself to an AD-FREE life

quote:
Originally posted by MOBIUS
That is what tipped the scales.

Loosing his home state had nothing to do with it?

quote:
Iraq would also be overjoyed to sell you Kuwaiti oil after it captured Kuwait. Yet for some reason you had to liberate Kuwait for the sake of oil.

One of the reasons for that war was that the US was fearful that other states might conclude that aggression pays and we would have to deal with more wars of conquest.

When even a raving moron like Tribune (who sees a Jewish conspiracy under every bed) sees the truth, why can't you?

Ned is offline Ned
Prince
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999
time: 21:26
  Old Post 26-02-2003 08:34
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#86 Report this post to a moderator
Avatar Enlargement: We've got the solution

You know, guys, I wish this were about OIL. We could then suck Iraq dry will leaving her people impoverished. My what joy this would bring to the Nazi heart of the average American!

Sava is offline Sava
King
GO GO GO!
Mar 2001
time: 23:26
  Old Post 26-02-2003 08:37
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#87 Report this post to a moderator
Increase the size of your Attachments

don't worry nED We don't need to! We've already sucked iraq dry with economic sanctions.... I bet SADDAM is ready to giev up after seing his people suffer!

JohnT is offline JohnT

Emperor
Capitalist
Mar 1999
time: 00:26
  Old Post 26-02-2003 08:45
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#88 Report this post to a moderator
Lose 30 kilos (of popups)

quote:
Originally posted by Comrade Tribune


Yeah, but did you ever ask yourself, *why* you do that?

Because they ignore UN resolutions by the scores, instead of just one or two, like Iraq?

Because they are the last true Apartheid state in the world?

Because routinely assassinating political enemies is cool?

Because Israel is such a good friend of the United States, who did for you, what, exactly?

Just because?


Or because....

Wait! I almost fed the troll!!!!

*JohnT snatches back tasty morsel before the evil troll snaps at his hand*

Comrade Tribune is offline Comrade Tribune
Prince
Vienna, Austria
Nov 1999
time: 06:26
Post  Old Post 26-02-2003 08:47
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#89 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, pre-order Civilization IV

quote:
Originally posted by Ned
My what joy this would bring to the Nazi heart of the average American!


The average American is not a Nazi. Just ignorant, brain-washed, and ill-behaved like, well, DinoDoc.

Ted Striker is offline Ted Striker
Emperor
United States of America
Jan 1970
time: 21:26
  Old Post 26-02-2003 08:49 Visit Ted Striker's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#90 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

It's not about oil it's about chocolate.

 
Pages (7): [ 1   2   3   4   5   6     >> ]
< Last Thread     Next Thread > Post New Thread     Post A Reply
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:26.
Apolyton Time is 00:26.
    top of page
Rate This Thread:
archivepost
Forum Jump:
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
 




Contact Us - Apolyton Civilization Site - Support Us!

Building a better Apolyton through better information. Click here and take our poll!
Non-US visitors, click here!

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.0.3
Copyright ©2000, 2001, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.

Page generated in 0.0625 seconds (91.76% PHP - 8.24% MySQL) with 31 queries
Page Loading Time:

Support Apolyton: Amazon USA | Amazon UK | Amazon DE | Amazon FR |
Support Apolyton and get FREE PLUS, Buy from Chips&Bits: Galactic Civilizations | Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition | Call to Power 2 | Civilization: The Boardgame | GURPS/ Alpha Centauri | Alpha Centauri | Civilization IV | Civilization III: Complete |


Front Page | Civilization IV | Civilization III | Civilization II | Call to Power II | Alpha Centauri | Master of Orion III
Rise of Nations | Galactic Civilizations | Galactic Civilizations II | Misc
Alt.Civs | Civ I | C:CtP I | About | News | Directory | Apolyton Store | Forums | Chat | Columns | Interviews | Newsletter
Scenario League | CSC | Clash of Civs | Spanish Site | CtP Maps | Cradle of Civ | WesW's Ctp1/2 Site | Civ3 Haven

apolyton.net | apolyton.com | civilization2.net | civilization3.net | civilization4.net | civilizationiv.info | calltopower.net | galciv.net | galciv2.net | moo3.net