 |
|
Comrade Tribune
|
 |
Vienna, Austria
Nov 1999 time: 06:26
|
|
quote: Originally posted by MichaeltheGreat
...but it takes more than ideology to explain the almost single-minded obsession with Saddam that these people have. |
Yes, again, but you, shall we say, overlook, geography.
After force-vassalizing Iraq, it will be so much easier to force-vassalize Syria, then Iran,...
As I said, this is either a mad world conquest scheme, or a creepy 'Kill-all-enemies-of-Israel' scheme.
Very unsavoury, one way or other.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ramo
|
 |
Austin, Texas, USA
Oct 1999 time: 23:26
|
|
It is about oil. It's not entirely about oil, or even mostly about oil (I'd say oil is the tertiary reason for war), but it's silly to think oil hasn't entered into the picture. It's not that the US wants access to Iraq's oil, but it wants control over it. Iraq has a huge oil reserve, and if US gains control over this reserve, it gains significant leverage over other states.
What the war is primarily about is to maintain Shrub's authority within the US and to maintain the US' authority around the world. Saddam's a fairly easy target, hated within and outside of Iraq, is a former American client who has defied our authority, so the US wants to take him out to get Iraq back in line and give other states something to think about before defying the US.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MichaeltheGreat
|
|
Apolyton Grand Executioner
|
 |
mooning the house that Ruth built.
Oct 1999 time: 21:26
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ned
In '91, the Iraqi army had older Soviet equiment that could not compete with modern American, or for that matter, European arms. For example, our tanks could begin to engage Saddam's tanks at 2 miles, while the max range of Saddam's tanks was 1 mile. |
Both of which were meaningless, as battlefield visibility conditions had engagements occuring frequently at 1000-1500 meters, and the only straight-up fighting at that range was Bradleys against T-72s.
quote:
But with France and Germany as willing arms suppliers, Saddam could equip his forces with technology on a par with our own and probably far superior to any of his neighbors execpt the Israeli's. |
Both Kuwait and Saudi Arabia have export version Abrams tanks. The French don't have anything similar, and IIRC, the Germans haven't exported their higher end Leopards, etc. (with that beautiful Rheinmetall gun) outside of NATO.
The basic problem, even if Saddam had all the money, and all the willing suppliers, is that Iraqi doctrine is way too dated, too top-down, and too static. For the Iraqi military to be a threat, they'd have to start sending their officers to the NTC, to CGSC, and to the AWC program, like our Saudi and Kuwaiti allies get to do.
It would take Saddam years, probably on the order of a decade, to get his army in decent shape to be a real threat, if he had unlimited access to everything.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Comrade Tribune
|
 |
Vienna, Austria
Nov 1999 time: 06:26
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ned
That makes many Americans concerned about Iraq, even if we are not Jewish, because we support Israel. |
Yeah, but did you ever ask yourself, *why* you do that?
Because they ignore UN resolutions by the scores, instead of just one or two, like Iraq?
Because they are the last true Apartheid state in the world?
Because routinely assassinating political enemies is cool?
Because Israel is such a good friend of the United States, who did for you, what, exactly?
Just because?
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:26. Apolyton Time is 00:26. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|