 |
|
Sikander
|
 |
Boulder, Colorado, United Snakes of America
Jan 2000 time: 22:26
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Boris Godunov
BAM. Ming, of all people, debunked this. CNN consistently beats FOX in overall ratings, by a large margin. Only certain FOX programs beat out CNN, like that talentless O'Reilly bastard. |
No you are as wrong as Imran was when he said the same thing, but I doubt you'll be as stubborn in your "defense in the face of incontrevertable evidence" as he usually is. Fox is now #1, even though it isn't as available as CNN. Look up "Fox, CNN, ratings" on Google for confirmation. Ming noted the change in a thread last week somtime.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Guynemer
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Shi Huangdi
Liberal whining aside, FOXnews is a respected journalism source. |
Respected by whom?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Q Cubed
|
 |
t3h y3ll0w p3ril
Apr 1999 time: 23:26
|
|
quote: Why would Chinese and South Korean complaints make Japan run ads in the US? The United States doesn't have the irrational fear of Japanese peacekeepers that China and South Korea does... |
Drake, it's not exactly irrational.
when another nation forcibly annexes yours and occupies it in one of the most brutal regimes ever imagined because of its militarization, it's kinda hard not to be somewhat afraid of it.
france was extremely wary of germany until its division and subsequent funky buttlovin' taught it differently.
===
also: if you go by text, as in, people who go to the websites to read the articles, cnn.com is on netcraft.com's top 50 list, whereas foxnews.com doesn't even show up.
i realize this probably also includes foreign readers, but i still believe that this is a rather significant marker: fox news' televised success might well hinge on its excellence at coming up with quotables and sound bites.
Last edited by Q Cubed on 04-03-2003 at 07:40
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Q Cubed
|
 |
t3h y3ll0w p3ril
Apr 1999 time: 23:26
|
|
quote: Fear of a remilitarized Japan would indeed be rational. Fear of Japanese involvement in peacekeeping operations, however, is absurd. The Chinese and South Koreans are making a mountain out of a mole hill... |
Japanese involvement in peacekeeping operations meant that their troops, to be used for "self-defence" purposes as stated in their constitution, oughtn't be used outside of japan.
much like the situation when germany finally sent troops outside of germany during the balkan situation, the neighbors weren't too happy about that.
it's not irrational, it's understandable.
especially since japan seems to be considering a remilitarization and a more proactive defensive stance-- and unlike germany, it never apologized, nor does it seem to greive, for what it did leading up to the destruction of hiroshima and nagasaki.
that, and its current prime minister has repeatedly visited a shrine that houses the names of war criminals.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Q Cubed
|
 |
t3h y3ll0w p3ril
Apr 1999 time: 23:26
|
|
quote: The Japanese Constitution allows for the deployment of troops outside Japan for peacekeeping missions. There was a lengthy debate within Japan that determined this. |
i realize this. doesn't mean that china and korea have to be happy with the result.
quote: It's irrational. Japanese involvement in peacekeeping is nothing to fear. |
not japanese involvement in peacekeeping. japanese troops, period.
quote: BS. The Japanese are still as pacifist as ever and have fought US pressure for them to be more military assertive in the region. |
they have also sought to defend themselves, and have even suggested that they would be far more aggressive in the future.
link
link 2
quote: There's no shame in a Japanese leader visiting the Yasukuni Shrine; it's meant to honor all those who fought for Japan, even those who made horrible mistakes. |
including those responsible for the drafting of comfort women, for those responsible for biological experimentation on prisoners, for those responsible for slave labor, for those responsible for nanking...
it's a shrine that holds the names of many noble soldiers; that's not what the koreans and the chinese protest. it's the fact that the war criminals were added, secretly, and were never taken off.
look, i'm not saying that i have a fear of a remilitarized japan. i'm just saying, japan has much to fear from a nuclear nkorea, and even more so from a nuclear reunified korea; korea and china have much to fear from japan; and korea and japan ought to fear china much more than they do already.
it's rational, i think. all of them have very valid greivances against each other, all of them are naturally wary of each other. it's simply a matter of japan really needing to work hard in convincing the other nations that it's got no territorial ambitions; and it'll have to face down a good deal of history to prove that. an apology would be nice, for one. as would the removal of certain names from the yasukuni shrine.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Spiffor
|
 |
CPA - Evil Clone brigade
Nov 2001 time: 06:26
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Drake Tungsten
quote: an apology would be nice, for one. |
The Japanese have apologized before; it's just never been good enough for the South Koreans who feel the need to lop their fingers off whenever a Japanese PM goes to the Yasukuni Shrine. |
I wasn't aware there has been any official apology on behalf of Japan and the Japanese people, and that Japanese history books acknowledged and taught the horrors Japan has perpetuated during the war.
Dealing with the past is extremely different with forgetting the past. It is a painful task, especially for those who have to cope with the guilt of their ancestors while being innocent themselves.
Germany has done so for 50 years about the Jews and the whole WW2, and is beginning to overcome it. France has recently overcome his pro-nazi behaviour in WW2, and is currently overcoming the horrors made on its behalf during the Algerian war. It is painful, but after that, we can expect to be at peace with the past, rather than having it haunting us long, long, long after.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Drake Tungsten
|
 |
Knee deep in alien womyn...
Oct 2001 time: 14:26
|
|
quote: I wasn't aware there has been any official apology on behalf of Japan and the Japanese people |
There have been apologies on specific issues, like the comfort women. There's never been a blanket apology for everything that happened, but I don't really see the difference between that and doing it piecemeal.
http://www.jei.org/Archive/JEIR98/9839w4.html
quote: and that Japanese history books acknowledged and taught the horrors Japan has perpetuated during the war. |
The textbooks still whitewash Japanese actions, which is one of my major issues with the Japanese. It's no reason to cut off your fingers or protest Japanese peacekeepers, however...
Last edited by Drake Tungsten on 04-03-2003 at 09:56
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:26. Apolyton Time is 00:26. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|