 |
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Sprayber
Just in case there were any doubts about everyone's opinion. What do you think of the men and women who are over there or going over there to fight? Not Bush. Not Republicans. But the real life people that are over there.
There are lots of different kinds of people over there. Doctors, Lawyers, Factory workers, Teachers, Construction Workers Cops, Firefighers. There are lots of fathers, sons, daugthers, sisters, brothers, moms. Despite popular opinion, there are plenty of democratics, Libertarians, and Independents.
No need for a poll with complicated headings. Just say what you feel.
Do you blame them?
How would you treat them if you came up on one?
Do you look down on them?
Do you look up to them?
Do you know someone over there?
What is your idea of what one looks like?
There are lots of things going through my mind tonight. Some of my unit won't be going over there for various reasons. Too old, or health issues that doesn't affect them but by technicalities make them ineligible for deployment. All of those that won't be going expressed regret that they were kept out. No one wants to go but no one seems to want to be left behind. I'm just interested in some of the opinions here. |
I believe there are there to murder inocent women and children for nothing more than oil. Or primarily oil.
I believe that there's no justification for that or excuse.
Of course the responsibility is climaxing. Meaning that the president of a country bares much more responsibility than a soldier of that country.
I think they are fooled in believeing that what they are doing is good, or they aren't but they just don't care eitherway.
As to how I feel about them, they are there to kill for oil and no amount of nice dressing is not going to change that.
I have no feelings of sympathy if they are killed or ifthey are someone's daughter or son. They are attacking.
On the contrary I feel much sympathy for the inocent Iraqi mothers and children that will be massacred by their bombs.
So no, no sympathy whatsoever.
That is the general feeling, feelings on a personal level are of course different.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:26
|
|
quote: I don't remember the stats, but I remember that a small % of "americans" actually faught in the revolution. Yet, it is this small % that we owe our freedoms to. |
Then don't imply that the soldiers today have anything in common with the people who fought the revolution. They aren't fighting for my freedom, or anyone else's, they're fighting for what Bush judges to be in the national interest of the US, which, in this case, means getting another puppet state in the MidEast, and, by the way, enhancing the US's ability to **** with people.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:26
|
|
quote: And ignorance rears it's ugly head. |
Wanna have an IQ contest? I doubt you'll win.
quote: Say, Davy. You're into martial arts. |
Yes, and if you want to have some other type of contest, I doubt you'll win that one either, so **** off.
BTW, who ever said I was a pacifist? I'm not.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:26
|
|
quote: I'd just as soon kill David as look at him |
Why do you want to kill me? I don't want to kill YOU. Well, you know roughly where I live, and with a bit of detective work could probably pinpoint an address. *shrug*
quote: The I.Q. bit? Floyd would be shocked, as many might. |
Maybe you are pretty smart. I don't know you in real life - it's just that you're debate participation hasn't, shall we say, been up to snuff. A bunch of ad hominems and nationalism don't make an argument - see, those take actual arguments and supportable positions.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:26
|
|
What slams did I make against people in uniform? I slammed their decision to join an aggressive and imperialistic organization, but I have no personal problem with people I've never met.
But in any case, if I wanted to actually slam them, I would have a much better argument for doing that than I would for looking up to them and revering them - certainly in this case.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:26
|
|
Then I'll thank you not to criticize my arguments. If you want to disagree with me, fine, post some arguments, to which I will thoroughly respond - or, at least, respond with the thoroughness demanded by the arguments.
That goes for both of you. If you can't - or won't - shoot me down in a logical and consistent manner, don't shoot ad hominems my direction. It makes you look ridiculous.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tuberski
|
 |
ACK!!! PTHBBPPPTTT!!!!
Feb 2002 time: 23:26
|
|
quote: Originally posted by David Floyd
Then don't imply that the soldiers today have anything in common with the people who fought the revolution. They aren't fighting for my freedom, or anyone else's, they're fighting for what Bush judges to be in the national interest of the US, which, in this case, means getting another puppet state in the MidEast, and, by the way, enhancing the US's ability to **** with people. |
So, you think that people who have been in the service, are still in the service because of who the president is? And what his policies are?
Maybe, just maybe some people fell the need to protect the freedoms that you take for granted David. Did you think of that?
Do you think that this country would be safer with no military?
Most soldiers today, do have something in common with the people who fought in the revolution, they believe in freedom and this country.
You say our military is an offensive military.
You're right.
I would rather project power and death on my enemies, than wait for them to come to my country to inflict pain and suffering.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:26
|
|
quote: So, you think that people who have been in the service, are still in the service because of who the president is? And what his policies are? |
I don't know. But the US militarist policies have been similarly aggressive and imperialistic for years.
quote: Maybe, just maybe some people fell the need to protect the freedoms that you take for granted David. Did you think of that? |
Sure, but there is no threat of invasion, and there would be no threat of attack if the US was not militaristic and imperialistic.
quote: Do you think that this country would be safer with no military? |
Possibly.
quote: Most soldiers today, do have something in common with the people who fought in the revolution, they believe in freedom and this country. |
So do I, but the difference is, I don't go take away the freedom of other people in order to try to enhance my own.
quote: I would rather project power and death on my enemies, than wait for them to come to my country to inflict pain and suffering. |
Which they would never do if we were not imperialistic and aggressive.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:26. Apolyton Time is 00:26. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|