 |
|
MRT144
|
|
Seattle Washington
Oct 2002 time: 21:26
|
|
stuie, that would be what boddingtons does, although its been a while. i found him quite charming though while he was drunk and pleading with me to tell ming to call off his dogs
|
|
|  |
 |
|
DaShi
|
 |
The Taste of Japan
Sep 2000 time: 05:26
|
|
No problem.
Last edited by DaShi on 07-03-2003 at 21:34
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MRT144
|
|
Seattle Washington
Oct 2002 time: 21:26
|
|
the omnipresent winking smiley! its really no match for my non squitarism style of debate
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ozz
|
|
Canada
Mar 2002 time: 05:26
|
|
quote: Originally posted by monkspider
The dogpile doctrine- This strategy relies on overwhelming army of posts to break the opponent's will to resist when the enemy cannot counter. In other words, the goal here is to post the opponent white. This doctrine relies on quanity, not necessarily quality to defeat the enemy practioners |
Aptly named, this doctrine results in a pile of Sh*t posts, thence the term "dogpile" is all too apt.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Japher
|
 |
Ook! Ook! Ack! Ack! Ack!
Jun 2002 time: 05:26
|
|
quote: In it, you would cut and paste the entire post(except for any strong point the opponents had which you don't want to adress) |
Yeah, well it just makes your post look bigger, implying that there might actually be some merit to what you are trying to say.
quote: slice up into a bunch of piece |
In order to make your post look really, really, really, much bigger than actually really, really, is.
quote: and reply to everything they said one by one. |
Sometimes you have to, i.e. when some one says "did you even read my post?" and you know that you didn't and were actually following some other strategy.
quote: The opponent would do the same, cut and pasting the opponents cutting and pasting, and the argumenting into an unreadable mess. |
Yes, but they are fun.
The Random Blabber Strat - This strategy uses the fine art of BS to give an almost meaningful argument while actually not saying anything useful at all. Sometimes the argument will be confusing, this way, in order to reply, the rebuttee may have to read the post several times in order to reply, and will, in the end, not really have a solid ground to stand on because there never really was one to begin with. All there was, was some long winded retort filled with run-on sentences, commas where there shouldn't be com,mas, and really no sense to be made of the argument at all.
This Strat is commonly used by Japher, that fool, and most political leaders, such as Bush last night.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MRT144
|
|
Seattle Washington
Oct 2002 time: 21:26
|
|
i thought he be lionel richie, because those ads for this new "best of" is the most obnoxious thing EVER
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MRT144
|
|
Seattle Washington
Oct 2002 time: 21:26
|
|
which leads me to my next point. what is the point of debatng on apolyton if nobody changes their opinions on it or even cares about counter arguements? imran, back me up here.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MrBaggins
|
|
True... I've conceded a point maybe twice in ten years of internet discussion.
It can happen... but its like lightning striking
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:26. Apolyton Time is 00:26. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|