 |
|
Demerzel
|
|
quote: Originally posted by paiktis22
Let's recapitulate.
A 25 year old student was arrested in Britain because he had books decribing the acts of militant groups in Europe.
He also happened to have publicly say that 17N is not a terrorist group.
These 2 things were enough under british "law" to have him arrested and that is perfectly OK and democratic according to the British established order? |
Your facts, your bias. Stop trying to present it as the truth.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
CerberusIV
|
|
quote: Originally posted by paiktis22
These 2 things were enough under british "law" to have him arrested and that is perfectly OK and democratic according to the British established order?
|
Yes it is. Let's see what happens next IN COURT!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
quote: Originally posted by TheStinger
Thats what you think is the evidence is against him it doesn't mean tahst all they have got, wait and see |
That's what British and Greek sources say are the "evidence" against him.
And we haven't even begun talking about the "trial".
How was his arrest democratic in the first place according to you, who you seem perfectly at ease in that political culture of yours? (which differs greatly from most european contries' right to a free expression and, gasp, owning books)
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
quote: Originally posted by CerberusIV
Yes it is. Let's see what happens next IN COURT! |
Then in Britain the right to a free expression doesn't exist, since you accept that. And that would be mightily discomforting where I come from. And we're still talking about his illegal (in any democratic society which respects indivindual freedoms) arrest.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MrBaggins
|
|
quote: Originally posted by paiktis22
That's what British and Greek sources say are the "evidence" against him.
And we haven't even begun talking about the "trial".
How was his arrest democratic in the first place according to you, who you seem perfectly at ease in that political culture of yours? (which differs greatly from most european contries' right to a free expression and, gasp, owning books) |
The police would not release information that could compromise other ongoing investigations, such as his links to other specific terrorists.
ALL governments (even Greece) reserve the rights to not disclose information which is against public interest.
The information that has been released to the public is actually unlikely to be the whole story.
MrBaggins
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
quote: Originally posted by MrBaggins
The police would not release information that could compromise other ongoing investigations, such as his links to other specific terrorists.
ALL governments (even Greece) reserve the rights to not disclose information which is against public interest.
The information that has been released to the public is actually unlikely to be the whole story.
MrBaggins |
The british "police" released the reasons for his arrest and according to sources these are: books.
And a dissenting opinion.
All that in Britain's constitutional monarchy.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
CerberusIV
|
|
quote: Originally posted by paiktis22
Then in Britain the right to a free expression doesn't exist, since you accept that and that would be mightily discomforting where I come from. |
For my views on the right to free expression I would refer you back to the link in my early post about the cleric who has just been jailed for nine years for inciting race hate and murder. Incitment to commit a criminal act is an offence in most countries. It may or may not apply in this case.
You still haven't answered my question as to whether the guy who has been arrested is someone you know?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MrBaggins
|
|
quote: Originally posted by paiktis22
Then in Britain the right to a free expression doesn't exist, since you accept that. And that would be mightily discomforting where I come from. And we're still talking about his illegal (in any democratic society which respects indivindual freedoms) arrest. |
So in Greece, you could be in possession of child porn, and claim it was your right to possess it, due to free expression?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MrBaggins
|
|
Nope... i'm equating material which supports or promotes terroristic acts... like the guy is alledged to have... with childporn.
They are both illegal activities.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Demerzel
|
|
is "anyone" else "sick" of paiktis' "tendancy" to "surround" every "word" he "wants" to "ridicule" with ""s?
oh and I'm interested in your lack of response paitkis to the fact that hundreds of people have been arrested in Europe for terrorist activities recently yet you convienently only feel the need to post about this one?
bias++
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
quote: Originally posted by MrBaggins
Nope... i'm equating material which supports or promotes terroristic acts... like the guy is alledged to have... with childporn.
They are both illegal activities. |
So having books who don't agree with the crown is an illegal activitey in Britain.
Or maybe it is having an opinion.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
lightblue
|
|
L'Boro, UK
Oct 2001 time: 05:26
|
|
The only reason he posts about it is because the person in question is Greek, and Greek people could of course never be guilty of anything, and Greek people being arrested abroad must be the poor victims of oppressive and unfair governments...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Demerzel
is "anyone" else "sick" of paiktis' "tendancy" to "surround" every "word" he "wants" to "ridicule" with ""s?
oh and I'm interested in your lack of response paitkis to the fact that hundreds of people have been arrested in Europe for terrorist activities recently yet you convienently only feel the need to post about this one?
bias++ |
Well yes since it has been brought to my attention and is thoroughly illegal with any given healthy aspect of what a democracy should be.
I don't know about the other cases. If there were Greeks involved I would know from my media. And if they would have been illegal and a suffocation of basic democratic liberties of course I'd comment on them too.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MrBaggins
|
|
quote: Originally posted by paiktis22
So having books who don't agree with the crown is an illegal activitey in Britain.
Or maybe it is having an opinion. |
No... the key phrase is illegal activity... this has nothing to do with 'agreement' or an 'opinion'.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Demerzel
|
|
I have an opinion, most of my friends do, the books I read generally tend to have opinions in them - yet strangely enough none of us have been arrested, jailed or executed. why?
Scenario 1.
We are all informers for the fascist powers that be at British Govt. HQ
Scenario 2.
People are free to express their opinions here and as we have broken no laws and possess no media that promotesd or facilitates criminal activity - the Police have no need/desire to talk to us.
Hmm wonder if no.2 is more likely ?
Opinion allowed? YES
Criminal activity allowed? NO
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MrBaggins
|
|
Occam's Razor proves that No.2 is true, of course.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Demerzel
|
|
quote: Originally posted by MrBaggins
Occam's Razor proves that No.2 is true, of course. |
Ooh sounds like an opinion! ARREST THIS MAN!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MrBaggins
|
|
Not as simple as opinion...
quote:
Ockham's Razor ("Occam" is a Latinised variant) is the principle proposed by William of Ockham in the fifteenth century that "Pluralitas non est ponenda sine neccesitate", which translates as "entities should not be multiplied unnecessarily". Various other rephrasings have been incorrectly attributed to him. In more modern terms, if you have two theories which both explain the observed facts then you should use the simplest until more evidence comes along. See W.M. Thorburn, "The Myth of Occam's Razor," Mind 27:345-353 (1918) for a detailed study of what Ockham actually wrote and what others wrote after him.
The reason behind the razor is that for any given set of facts there are an infinite number of theories that could explain them. For instance, if you have a graph with four points in a line then the simplest theory that explains them is a linear relationship, but you can draw an infinite number of different curves that all pass through the four points. There is no evidence that the straight line is the right one, but it is the simplest possible solution. So you might as well use it until someone comes along with a point off the straight line.
Also, if you have a few thousand points on the line and someone suggests that there is a point that is off the line, it's a pretty fair bet that they are wrong.
|
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Demerzel
|
|
Baggins! Shire!
erm, I was parodying it old boy ( I am an educated man after all ). I was well aware that all things being equal the simplest explanation is often the right one, but that'd have not been much fun to ridicule.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:26. Apolyton Time is 00:26. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|