Apolyton Archive  |  Preserved copy of the Apolyton Civilization Site and its forums as they stood in September 2005. Read-only; nothing here can be posted to or replied to.  |  Forum index |  About this archive |  The 1998–2001 UBB forums
Today on Apolyton WARDELL INTERVIEW PROMO A.C.S. HISTORY CHAPTER 4 GET CIV4 /w FREE PLUS! A.C.S. PHOTO GALLERY GET A.O.M. V1.1
Apolyton Civilization Forums
main| civ2| civ3| civ4| smac| ctp2| ron| moo3| galciv| galciv2| alt| about|
ApolytonPLUS | register | search | faq | new posts | pm (-/-) | upload | members
hall of fame new! | civgroups | civgroups news | interviews | the column | radio | chat | directory | news | store | PLUS
Apolyton Civilization Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.0.3 Apolyton Civilization Forums > Civilization III > Civ3-PtW Democracy Game > C3PtWDG Legoland > Gathering Storm - correspondence & foreign affairs
Show a Printable Version | Email This Page to Someone! | Receive updates to this thread | Report this to Apolyton news!
16.Sep: 7 NEW FILES
15.Sep: TRIAL + NO SLEEP = ONE GAME
13.Sep: PATCH THE PREVIOUSLY UNPATCHABLE

bottom of page
   - CIV3 CONQUESTS $29.99 - CIV3 from $9.99
Author
Thread   
Pages (16): [ <<   12   13   14   15   16   ]
< Last Thread     Next Thread > Post New Thread     Post A Reply
Tiberius is offline Tiberius

Emperor
Europe
Jan 2000
time: 06:26
  Old Post 01-12-2003 14:31
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#421 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton or Terrorists Win

quote:
and that GS is properly armed to defend its homeland against potential invasions.


Err, well, how do we do that?
We are trying to tell them that they don't have saltpeter, right?

How about : "We are ready to ensure that GS keeps at least on par with Bob tech-wise and that GS will be able to defend its homeland against potential invasions."


Hmm, I'm not very happy with my version either. Better ideas?

vondrack is offline vondrack

Emperor
Praha, Czech Republic
Jan 2002
time: 06:26
  Old Post 01-12-2003 14:46
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#422 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization III: Complete

What about "properly equipped"?

I do not want to plainly say we will trade them saltpeter, but I want to make it obvious we will - by mentioning "even strategic resources" and later talking about their ability to properly defend their homeland. Also, worded this way, it is more of a general promise - Stormia is relatively small and may lack even more than just saltpeter. This way, we say we will help them out with whatever they may need to remain competitive (or, at least, that's what I am trying to say). This "whatever" may even mean gold... and I would be contented to imply that. Once the war is over, we will need them to balance out the Bobian powers we are helping to create now.

I am assuming that GS already knows they have no saltpeter - various things indicate that.

Tiberius is offline Tiberius

Emperor
Europe
Jan 2000
time: 06:26
  Old Post 01-12-2003 15:22
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#423 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization: The Boardgame

to ensure that GS's armed forces are properly equipped to defend ... ? Sounds good.

vondrack is offline vondrack

Emperor
Praha, Czech Republic
Jan 2002
time: 06:26
  Old Post 01-12-2003 15:52
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#424 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

OK, that's probably perfect.

vondrack is offline vondrack

Emperor
Praha, Czech Republic
Jan 2002
time: 06:26
  Old Post 01-12-2003 17:50
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#425 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization: The Boardgame

Few more comments like those of OPD and Sir Ralph in the main forum and I am going to scrap my draft and suggest sending them a very brief note:

Guys, stuff it up your a$$. We want you gone from this game. Strategy or no strategy, potential or no potential.

Jesus, I am feeling sick of them. Darekill spends half an hour writing a rather cool poem for everybody to read, posting in the almost dead public forum, and those idiots rush to tell him how naughty he was doing that...

EDIT: can a native English speaker explain to me what Sir Ralph might have meant by that "crap" of his in the public forum today? Is there a chance he was just expressing his surprise about the news of their defeat? Or was he saying "what you say is crap, I agree with OPD"?

Last edited by vondrack on 01-12-2003 at 18:37

Tiberius is offline Tiberius

Emperor
Europe
Jan 2000
time: 06:26
  Old Post 01-12-2003 20:12
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#426 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

I think what SR meant is: that poem is crap.

I'd say just ignore them. Some people just can't lose with dignity.

Last edited by Tiberius on 01-12-2003 at 20:18

ZargonX is offline ZargonX
Emperor
Space
Sep 2002
time: 00:26
  Old Post 01-12-2003 20:36
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#427 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations

Oh, I took it to mean "crap" in regards to the loss. I could be wrong, though. It can be hard to interpret one-word replies, even if you are a native speaker As for your draft, Vondrack, it looks very good. I also believe GS know they have no saltpeter, as I'm going to guess some boasting GoWer probably taunted them with the fact at some point. We don't need to say it explicitly, but they will know what we mean.

And, yes, if they can't learn to have fun with the game, maybe we should just let them fall into obscurity...

lmtoops is offline lmtoops
King
Dallas, Texas
Mar 2002
time: 23:26
  Old Post 01-12-2003 22:16
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#428 Report this post to a moderator
Get a bigger avatar today!

I have no idea what he meant by "crap".

The poem was a bit harsh, but that may have been the language barrier. In any case, GS should have taken it and not complained. They have dished out enough taunts, that they deserve to take a few.

It will be interesting to see how they respond (in game). They could temporarily back off, make peace, or go all out war. At this point, I cannot determine which direction they will take.

vondrack is offline vondrack

Emperor
Praha, Czech Republic
Jan 2002
time: 06:26
  Old Post 01-12-2003 22:28
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#429 Report this post to a moderator
Increase Your PM Length

quote:
Originally posted by lmtoops
They have dished out enough taunts, that they deserve to take a few.

That's a good point. After taunting your opponent, you should be ready to accept some mocking in return, if you fail.

quote:
Originally posted by lmtoops
It will be interesting to see how they respond (in game). They could temporarily back off, make peace, or go all out war. At this point, I cannot determine which direction they will take.

I am more and more convinced they will withdraw/quit from the war. After losing Army Group South and with a force too weak to actually make any difference in the East (I have just received a response from Aggie - what we can see on that coastal mountain is most probably part of the stack that was threatening Yellowknife), they have little means to keep the war efforts up.

After we offer friendly relations and support in case they withdraw, they would have to be nuts to not quit. They must be able to see their efforts are utterly futile. I'd bet they will try to keep their face by somehow saving RPers from extinction, probably by granting them exile in the Northern Stormia (since they will feel we would side with them if GoW/ND followed overseas - and I believe we should, if that was to happen).

Nimitz is offline Nimitz

King
of the last Realm of builders in Apolyton
Feb 2002
time: 23:26
  Old Post 01-12-2003 22:40
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#430 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization: The Boardgame

Ok, I just got back from my thanks giving vaction and found this message in my PMs thought you would like to see it.

quote:
Nimitz,

Theseus and I had a chat with Vondrack the other day. We were discussing GS's intended contract with GoW to hit ND, and recieved assurance that as long as we get GoW to agree to the deal, Lego will not intervene against GoW and/or GS in their war against ND.

As Lego FAM, we thought we'd like to check with you to confirm that this is Lego's official position, as you see it, and if so, to enquire whether we might be able to move to a formal agreement on this matter.

Regards,

CH

vondrack is offline vondrack

Emperor
Praha, Czech Republic
Jan 2002
time: 06:26
  Old Post 01-12-2003 22:49
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#431 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

We would like you to catch up by reading about the latest developments.

That PM is no longer relevant. GoW rejected GS' proposal, so anything we told them (a log of the chat Cort Haus mentioned is posted is this thread) no longer matters - as it was based upon the theoretical assumption GoW would take their offer.

Last edited by vondrack on 01-12-2003 at 22:54

Kloreep is offline Kloreep

Emperor
of the pillow
Jun 2002
time: 00:26
  Old Post 02-12-2003 02:40
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#432 Report this post to a moderator
Avatar Enlargement: We've got the solution

quote:
Originally posted by vondrack
EDIT: can a native English speaker explain to me what Sir Ralph might have meant by that "crap" of his in the public forum today? Is there a chance he was just expressing his surprise about the news of their defeat? Or was he saying "what you say is crap, I agree with OPD"?


I think it was just a general curse, either at the in-game situation or possibly at the fact that yet another thread is flaming up. It's not that much harder to write "this is crap" which would be clearly referring to the poem/previous posts.

vondrack is offline vondrack

Emperor
Praha, Czech Republic
Jan 2002
time: 06:26
  Old Post 02-12-2003 17:04
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#433 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton or Terrorists Win

Just to keep you informed, this is the message I included with the 370AD save sent to GS:

quote:
This is an official communication from the Senate of Legoland:

quote:
Honourable Nation of Gathering Storm,

We, the Senate of Legoland, thank you for the honest message and open
analysis of your current situation and options. We hope this response
of ours will make it easier for you to understand where we stand, what
our plans/intensions are, and most importantly, how all that affects
our current and future relations.

First: we, to a large extent, agree with your analysis regarding the
potentials of Lego, GS, GoW, and ND. In case GoW and ND split Bob
between themselves in a fair way, their potentials will almost match
the potential of Lego, with GS being severely shafted. We also agree
that a more-than-2-civ Bob would suit even our plans better, alas...
we do not see a way to create a stable world incorporating such a
setup.

Assuming RP either dies or survives only in a small exile in the
Northern Stormia and GS gains a decent share of the Bobian territory
(~100 tiles), the world might seem slightly better balanced at the
first glance: Lego ~400 tiles, GoW, ND, and GS ~300 tiles each. The
problem, though (from our point of view) would be that GS would make
our situation easier (by weakening the potential of GoW & ND), while
not improving its own enough to be able to win peacefully. If not
giving up the hopes to win the game, GS would be forced to try
conquering more land in order to match or outmatch us. Inevitably, we
would have to respond by defending the attacked nations, getting
involved.

Which, however, is exactly what's happening now.

When the war broke out and your armies joined, rather unexpectedly,
the troops of RP, we faced quite a difficult decision. Despite GoW and
ND entering their GA, we did not believe they were strong enough to
withstand the might of yours & RP combined in the long run, especially
considering your stunning triumph over the strong army of Voxian
immortals (later events have pretty much confirmed our concerns). We
had to decide whether we preferred Bob split between GoW & ND only or
(possibly multinational) Bob with your strong presence - which we, as
explained earlier in this message, regarded as a permanent threat to
our long term plans (we do not wish to expand beyond Legos).

Considering the circumstances addressed earlier, we decided the lesser
evil for us was Bob split between GoW & ND - and allied with them,
strictly defining the extent of our involvement and the goal to
achieve.

While it was not possible to ally with GoW & ND and protect them from
being overwhelmed by your armies without de facto standing
against RP, too, we did make it clear we would not get involved in
operations against RP. There was/is a treaty binding us to join no
wars against RP... and even though it probably sounds a bit
ridiculous, we still honour it in the way we deem appropriate. The
destruction or crippling of RP was/is not our business, even if we
have no intentions to oppose it. Furthermore, it would be futile to
pretend our own selfish interests are better served with anything but
a prolonged conflict on Bob.

It certainly is no news for you that GoW and ND want no presence of
yours on Bob. Legoland's role in this triple alliance is, said in a
bit simplified way, to ensure you do not win (on Bob), rather than to
ensure you lose there - though, in the end, it probably means the
same.

However, we would like to make it crystal clear that our role in the
alliance with GoW and ND ends with your last soldier leaving the
shores of Bob (or with a peace treaty signed between you, GoW, and
ND). As leaked in the chat some time ago, we even made it abundantly
clear to our current allies we would not support any invasion of
Stormia. Not only we would not support/join it, but we would oppose
it, just like we currently oppose your presence on Bob.

Once the war is over, we are ready to fully revive the cooperation and
trading between our two nations, including techs, luxuries, and
possibly even strategic resources. As correctly implied by your
message, a feeble GS would serve the victorious Bobians most,
indirectly hurting our own interests. We are ready to ensure GS keeps
at least on par with Bob tech-wise and that GS armed forces are
properly equipped to defend their homeland against potential
invasions. Once the war on Bob is over (or GS no longer involved in
it), there will be nothing preventing a close cooperation between our
two nations, unless, of course, GS decides to not cooperate with a
nation that hurt its interests in The Great Bobian War. Even if this
paragraph is not written in bold, it is the key part of our message to
you.

We fully acknowledge that our approach to the current situation, with
respect to you, is far from "fair". You've got every right to feel
bitter about us standing in your way. But then, in this sense, trying
to win the game is not "fair" to anyone... only one team can win and
Lego wants to win, in its own "builder" way, as much as you or anyone
else does.

We hope you understand - and we hope that despite standing against
each other now, we will not remain that way forever.

The Senate of Legoland

vondrack is offline vondrack

Emperor
Praha, Czech Republic
Jan 2002
time: 06:26
  Old Post 09-12-2003 16:24
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#434 Report this post to a moderator
Avatar Enlargement: We've got the solution

Hmmmm... good thing I have not played the turn yet. This from Cort Haus:

quote:
Vondrack,

You have the turn, so I want to suggest this now, while there's time.

GS intends to withdraw from Bob, but as we don't know whether we have any saltpeter on Stormia or within the area we still hold on Bob, we are clinging on until we have gunpowder (which we are researching).

If we knew for sure that we were holding none on Bob, we could start leaving immediately and attempt to make peace with ND & GoW. If we are holding some on Bob, but we have none on Stormia then it is essential that we do not abandon it yet - even a couple of turns of SP could be worth us fighting for.

Lego have already succeeded in weakening GS to the point of us no longer being in contention. Technically, we understand that your position in the alliance against us remains until every GS unit is off Bob, but the die is cast and Lego must recognise, for their own good, that GS is already broken as a rival.

So can you give us Gunpowder now to resolve the issue? It's a cheap tech now, but still takes turns. Lego has won its war, GS has blown the GoW/ND GA for you and delayed the construction of the Bobian uber-power. Now we need a break - in the interests of both of our civs. So how about it?

Regards,

CH
GS

I do not think we should send them GP for free now, but it may be worth considering whether to tell them they do not have any saltpeter on Stormia and that they do not hold any saltpeter on Bob (read: have any in the cultural borders) at the moment.

I am going to sit on the save until hearing back from at least some of you.

EDIT: we may also consider assuring GS of trading our excess saltpeter (for their second lux?), if they agree to reasonable conditions (no Bob invasion for a set period of time?)

redstar1 is offline redstar1
Prince
Belfast, Northern Ireland
Apr 2001
time: 05:26
  Old Post 09-12-2003 16:57
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#435 Report this post to a moderator
Enter the AD-FREE zone

I don't see any reason not to tell them that they do not hold any salt-peter. We have made it clear that our quarrell ends the moment their last unit leaves Bob and on that basis i'd be more than happy to start discussions regarding trade. If we had to trade our excess GP to anyone, I'd rather it were GS, the team we are least likely to have to fight in the near future.

vondrack is offline vondrack

Emperor
Praha, Czech Republic
Jan 2002
time: 06:26
  Old Post 09-12-2003 17:07
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#436 Report this post to a moderator
Tired of ads?

What about this: we tell them they are out of luck with saltpeter on Stormia (and hold none on Bob, as far as we can tell... I would be careful about the wording, as they may have units stationed over the saltpeter near Barcelona - I would use the "have no saltpeter in your cultural borders or close to them" formulation). We tell them they shut down their gp research now and start withdrawing from Bob immediately, saving cash. Once their last unit leaves Bob, we trade them gunpowder and 20 turns of saltpeter for half of their "savings" (or some set reasonable price) and a guarantee they will not return to Bob within 25 turns. I would leave their second luxury out of the equation, as we do not really need it ATM... gold would be better.

What do you think?

vondrack is offline vondrack

Emperor
Praha, Czech Republic
Jan 2002
time: 06:26
  Old Post 09-12-2003 17:14
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#437 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations

One more point - GS would have to guarantee they will not provide gp to RP (as that would be obviously hurting our allies).

redstar1 is offline redstar1
Prince
Belfast, Northern Ireland
Apr 2001
time: 05:26
  Old Post 09-12-2003 17:15
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#438 Report this post to a moderator
Enter the AD-FREE zone

Sounds fair enough to me

Tiberius is offline Tiberius

Emperor
Europe
Jan 2000
time: 06:26
  Old Post 09-12-2003 17:42
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#439 Report this post to a moderator
Suffering from ads?

Sounds good to me.
Anyway, giving GP to them is impossible now. They are still at war with ND and GoW and we can't help the enemies of our allies, even if on the long term they may become our friends. I believe they will understand that as long as we are part of the alliance, we can't really help them.
We can tell them that they don't have SP, we can promise to trade GP and SP when the war is over, but until then no trades, no gifts, nothing.

ZargonX is offline ZargonX
Emperor
Space
Sep 2002
time: 00:26
  Old Post 09-12-2003 20:13
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#440 Report this post to a moderator
Full PM-box? Change here!

I would approve telling them they are out of luck with their saltpeter holdings, but I am solidly against giving them GP until 2 conditions are met:

1)No GS presence on Bob
2)RP is eliminated on Bob.

This could only be superceded by a 3rd case, which would be if GoW/ND land on Estonia.

vondrack is offline vondrack

Emperor
Praha, Czech Republic
Jan 2002
time: 06:26
  Old Post 09-12-2003 20:20
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#441 Report this post to a moderator
Suffering from ads?

I understand #1 (and 100% agree), Z - but why #2?

If GS leaves Bob, making peace with GoW/ND (i.e.: breaking their alliance with RP), and agrees to not trade gunpowder to RP, is there any reason to wait for the RP elimination on Bob?

I am not pushing anything, just asking about the reasoning...

redstar1 is offline redstar1
Prince
Belfast, Northern Ireland
Apr 2001
time: 05:26
  Old Post 09-12-2003 20:55
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#442 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Call to Power 2

Do we really care if they trade gunpowder to RP? From our point of view, any presence that RP has, or maintains on Bob, is advantageous to us in that it restricts the options ND and GOW have. This is a long term plus point but a plus point nonetheless.

Why don't we offer to trade GP to RP ourselves once our bit is done and GS is out of Bob, maybe we can get some nice gold for it

ZargonX is offline ZargonX
Emperor
Space
Sep 2002
time: 00:26
  Old Post 09-12-2003 21:15
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#443 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization III: Complete

Well, it was mostly so they wouldn't trade it to RP. I mean, as this game has demonstrated, just because someone says they won't do something, doesn't mean they won't Though, at this point, RP doesn't have any access to saltpeter either, do they? Either way, it's a diplomatic thing. I can't imagine our allies would be too happy with us trading with the enemy, even if it were indirectly

lmtoops is offline lmtoops
King
Dallas, Texas
Mar 2002
time: 23:26
  Old Post 09-12-2003 21:17
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#444 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization 2

Let's not forget our alliance with GoW/ND. Although we are not a war with RP, our allies are. So we cannot give RP our GP, in good faith.

Now we can trade GP to GS (after peace, GS off Bob), but put not trading restrictions. So if they give it to RP, so be it. It would help us a little...it would drain a few more resources from our allies, but in the end RP is toast.

Actally, this probably doesn't matter. I would think that part of the Peace deal would be the removal of RP from Bob. On the other hand (I think this is my 6th hand ), RP may wand to fight to the end. In any case, I say do not restrict GS on trading GP (but do not encourage it). If our allies complain, we can claim ignorance or stupidity, "we apoligize for our lapse in negotiations, Legoland failed to put a restriction on trading." .

redstar1 is offline redstar1
Prince
Belfast, Northern Ireland
Apr 2001
time: 05:26
  Old Post 10-12-2003 01:45
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#445 Report this post to a moderator
Avatar Enlargement: We've got the solution

..but as I understand it they are our 'allies' because GS is on Bob. Once GS leave I would understand that we are free to continue our own diplomatic path. I would imagine however that RP would not last long once GS are out of the war. Nor may they last too long on Stormia either....

vondrack is offline vondrack

Emperor
Praha, Czech Republic
Jan 2002
time: 06:26
  Old Post 10-12-2003 02:14
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#446 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

OK, I believe that whatever we decide to respond with, it is not going to affect our current turn, so I am going to play the turn now.

redstar1 is offline redstar1
Prince
Belfast, Northern Ireland
Apr 2001
time: 05:26
  Old Post 10-12-2003 02:39
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#447 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization: The Boardgame

but wait, i was about to suggest a sneak attack on GOW. With GS on our side together we can conquer the world!!!!!!

muhahahaa

vondrack is offline vondrack

Emperor
Praha, Czech Republic
Jan 2002
time: 06:26
  Old Post 10-12-2003 03:36
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#448 Report this post to a moderator
Increase the size of your Attachments

Uh... you meant to throw ALL of our THIRTEEN KNIGHTS at them?

redstar1 is offline redstar1
Prince
Belfast, Northern Ireland
Apr 2001
time: 05:26
  Old Post 10-12-2003 04:30
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#449 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, pre-order Civilization IV

Only one of our invincible knights of DOOM should be enough

vondrack is offline vondrack

Emperor
Praha, Czech Republic
Jan 2002
time: 06:26
  Old Post 10-12-2003 14:09
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#450 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Alpha Centauri

OK, we should respond somehow to the GS inquiry. Here is my attempt, considering what has been posted since yesterday in our forum. I believe there is no hurry, so we can discuss this a bit before sending it to GS:

quote:
Cort Haus,

After discussing your inquiry in the Senate of Legolad, we believe there is no harm in telling you that there is no saltpeter on Stormia and that there is no saltpeter inside or close to cultural borders of the territory you and RP currently hold on Bob.

As for trading gunpowder to you... we are sorry but that cannot be done until there is a peace treaty signed between you and GoW/ND. We hope you understand we cannot provide a key military tech to you, as long as you remain enemies of our current allies (even if you intend to withdraw from the war).

However, you have got our word that once the war between you and GoW/ND formally ends, we will trade gunpowder to you at a fair price - and not only that. If you agree to not influence the war on Bob (if there still is one at that time, of course), we will trade you one of our excess saltpeters.

We hope this guarantee will be enough for you to start negotiating a peace treaty with GoW/ND.

Respectfully,
vondrack

 
Pages (16): [ <<   12   13   14   15   16   ]
< Last Thread     Next Thread > Post New Thread     Post A Reply
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:26.
Apolyton Time is 00:26.
    top of page
Rate This Thread:
Forum Jump:
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
 




Contact Us - Apolyton Civilization Site - Support Us!

Building a better Apolyton through better information. Click here and take our poll!
Non-US visitors, click here!

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.0.3
Copyright ©2000, 2001, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.

Page generated in 0.1039 seconds (92.71% PHP - 7.29% MySQL) with 31 queries
Page Loading Time:

Support Apolyton: Amazon USA | Amazon UK | Amazon DE | Amazon FR |
Support Apolyton and get FREE PLUS, Buy from Chips&Bits: Galactic Civilizations | Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition | Call to Power 2 | Civilization: The Boardgame | GURPS/ Alpha Centauri | Alpha Centauri | Civilization IV | Civilization III: Complete |


Front Page | Civilization IV | Civilization III | Civilization II | Call to Power II | Alpha Centauri | Master of Orion III
Rise of Nations | Galactic Civilizations | Galactic Civilizations II | Misc
Alt.Civs | Civ I | C:CtP I | About | News | Directory | Apolyton Store | Forums | Chat | Columns | Interviews | Newsletter
Scenario League | CSC | Clash of Civs | Spanish Site | CtP Maps | Cradle of Civ | WesW's Ctp1/2 Site | Civ3 Haven

apolyton.net | apolyton.com | civilization2.net | civilization3.net | civilization4.net | civilizationiv.info | calltopower.net | galciv.net | galciv2.net | moo3.net