11-11-2003 08:26									#331
	Tired of ads?

My opinion : This is mostly old news to us - GoW has relayed to us that GS was trying to talk and convince them to move against ND.

From talking with other GoW members, I doubt that they are wanting to move against ND now. In fact many of them despise GS and may not ever to ally with them and many want to invade Stormia.

Personally I think that there is still a small opening to avoid war here as clearly GS is aware that RP is finished. Perhaps we can try to suggest a RP withdrawal to North Stormia (with their remaining defensive forces intact) and a guarantee that we will support them if GoW and ND invade Stormia and move from there.

Either way at least GS now won't go into attacking GoW's territory ignorant of the implications of doing so.

And personally I agree, ND is a big threat... and I really don't want a non-Poly civ to win this game.

	11-11-2003 11:32									#332
	Support Apolyton, buy Civilization III: Complete

I personally don't like any scenario discussed here, because all of them involved GS taking a good part of Bob, which would mean a GS victory. Is this so difficult to see? You don't even have to guess it, they alone said it: they want a part of Bob, because otherwise they can't win. They said it not once.

They realized they can't beat GoW+ND so now they are trying to hire GoW against ND. It was your fear Sharpe a Bob divided between ND and GoW, you said you are concerned about such a possibility. Now imagine a Bob divided between GoW (the bigger part) and GS (the south, probably). How about this for a threat? This is probably the worst scenario that could happen.

I don't see ND any more of a threat than GS with more significantly more land, or GoW owning 2/3 of Bob, etc.
What we are trying to achieve now is much more balanced: a two civ Bob, equally divided, and GS on Stormia only.

I honestly cannot fathom where this sudden love for GS come from. Why would we ally with them? They are our most important rival. Their economy is still well above ours. Give them soutehrn Bob and a FP and they will skyrocket in term of production and commerce. Giving them a good part of Bob means losing the game. They are fighting almost equally with two other civs being in their golden ages. They have themendous potential, don't let them unleash it!
So why this eagerness to avoid fighting with GS? OK, I'd rather avoid war too, but not with the price of letting them winning on Bob.

It is an entirely different question that we would help them if ND+GoW wanted to invade them, but only because this would again hinder the balance of power in the world.

We can outresearch ND anytime later, with the help of GS and Vox. Why are they such a great threat?

Make me understand why would we support GS? To not let a non-Poly win the game? Oh common! This must be the most pathetic argument I've heard so far (sorry!). Honestly as long as it is not us winning, I don't care who does.

	11-11-2003 13:00									#333
	Enter the AD-FREE zone

One more thing: what would we win if we accepted the proposed alliance (GS+GoW+Vox+us against ND)? 2 or 3 useless cities on Bob? Even if we got a luxury city, this still doesn't even come close to what GS would win: a second productive core.

	11-11-2003 14:25									#334
	Remove this text

I.... have... to... chill...

I can't believe my eyes. I have been, up to this point in the game, repeatedly reminded of that this was meant to be a team effort and that anything done on behalf of Legoland was supposed to be discussed and approved by the team. On the rare occasions I did something on my own, assuming this or that, I was heavily criticised.

And now... all of a sudden, two "saviours" emerge, Sharpe and Nimitz. They know best what it is we have to do to avoid the war with GS, thus they do not consult their idea of chatting with GS and just go ahead, acting on their own (or did I miss something?). I am sure that had I done anything remotely similar to this, I would be sentenced to death here. Guys (Sharpe & Nimitz), what the hell did you think you were doing? He? How the hell did you dare to arrange such a chat without letting others know in advance? Without discussing what we are going to tell them and what we are going to keep secret?

Jesus Christ, am I pissed off.

How come you openly discuss scenarios that are not along the lines we have agreed to in this forum? As far as I know, the plan is to have Bob divided between GoW & ND. No change to this plan was ever approved, despite revisiting the issue - last time not very long ago.

How come you openly tell GS we are allied to GoW/ND, expressly labelling our pact as defensive? How come you openly tell GS we would side with them should they be invaded on Stormia? How come you "explain" to GS why we allied with GoW/ND (not mentioning that what you told them was NOT what our reasons were)? Were these facts made public information?

WTF did you want to achieve? Our message to GS was very clear (and thoroughly debated & polled on here): keep off the homeland of GoW/ND or we declare war on you. THAT is how they (and we) avoid getting into a war. I honestly don't know what else you hoped to "come up with" - all you did was that you seriously weakened the effect of our message by stressing how much we wanted to avoid the war with them, making it look like the ultimatum was just a hollow threat. Plus, of course, you fed them with all kind of information they really did not need to know.

In case there still is someone not getting this: GoW is NOT going to backstab ND. I am totally lost how you can "seriously" discuss scenarios that are based upon the assumption they will (save the bullshit about "the chat with GS being just an academic discussion of all theoretical possibilities").

Where did GoW tell us about "things being open after RP is gone"? GoW made it very clear the goal was to split Bob evenly between them and ND, including transfers of cities from ND to GoW once the war is over (just read the chatlogs). Not a single word, not a slightest hint about stabbing ND in their back. EVER. Why did you make it look like they had suggested a possible betrayal?

How come you tell GS "we would be willing to send troops to defend Stormia, if there was an easy way" - was this ever proposed or discussed here??? He??? How come you told GS we would want a piece of Bob if blah blah blah... Again: when did we discuss this? Our stance has always been that Legoland is going to stay on Legos, not expand outside of it (that's, BTW, the reason for preferring Bob split between GoW & ND - because that is a setup that does not require us to go over the sea... everything else, which includes GS on Bob, does). So how come you discuss options that are the direct opposite of our approved team strategy?

I cannot possibly express how I feel now...

Let me say something very clearly: If we do not honour our alliance with GoW & ND, I am going to quit from this team immediately. There is something to be said for honour (besides, there is also something to be said for common sense...).

I would like to hear an explanation how it was possible that you, Sharpe & Nimitz, went ahead and without telling anyone or discussing anything, simply arranged an official chat with GS, discussing all the things that were discussed. I would also like to hear the rest of the team about whether this is considered acceptable - if it does, I might also become more active regarding our foreign relations, as there would clearly be a lot of opportunities.

	11-11-2003 15:13									#335
	Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations

To be honest I was also shocked when I saw the content of the chat; two legos talking with GS, none of them holding any official position AFAIK, nor a mandate from the team; and so openly discussing with GS what we want and what we don't want, and why, etc. I thought such talks are the responsability of the FAM, and Nimitz is not yet FAM. Besides he didn't even talk too much.

However I didn't want to make waves about it, but thinking about it, Vondrack is right: we jumped on him when/after he had talked about non-approved issues in his chats. This one was clearly more than an "informal chat" and way too much info was given away, both real things and also lies. (yes, lies; we don't have a defence pact with GoW, we have an alliance with them and we are not seeking a way to not honour it; or so I knew).

For one thing, I absolutely agree with Radek: this chat clearly weakened our position vis-a-vis GS: the ultimatum we sent them now sounds like a joke.

I know Sharpe has concernes about this alliance of ours, but his doubts were discussed and the team policy wasn't changed in this regard. This chat clearly goes beyond of what an individual member of our team should be allowed to discuss with other teams; especially if those views are his own and not the same with the approved, official team policy. This is why we have a FAM, to handle such sensitive negotiations.

What are we going to say now if GS hints GoW that we might be able to join their proposed alliance?

Maybe I'm not so pissed as Radek, but that doesn't make him less righteous about this. The course of our foreign relations is so important, that changing it without the team's approval is worse than playing a save in a different manner than approved.

Last edited by Tiberius on 11-11-2003 at 15:21

	11-11-2003 15:23									#336
	Lose 30 kilos (of popups)

Hmmmm, while I don't in essense have a problem with Sharpe and Nimitz chatting with GS members, and in fact I've said before that I'm in favour of keeping communication open..... I think the chat last night went a bit beyond what should maybe have been said.

But listen guys, theres little point in assigning blame or arguing about it... whats done is done...

There is obviously still some 'debate' over what our long term policy shoudl be, so perhaps we need to discuss it a bit further...

	11-11-2003 15:36									#337
	Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

The fact that some team members still have doubts about our foreign policy doesn't mean that they can carry these disagreements in our external relations. On the contrary, we should be more cautious until we decide what to do.

Besides I thought we decided what to do. The fact that not everybody agreed with it doesn't make it less official, as long as the majority approved it.

	11-11-2003 15:43									#338
	Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations

I know I'm just saying that there obviously appears to be some confusion

	11-11-2003 16:05									#339
	Support Apolyton, buy Civilization: The Boardgame

As I said in the FAM election thread, it was me that arranged the chat not Nimitz - I would have invited in anyone who was online at the time. Several of us have asked repeated that we should talk with GS , but Vondrack has seemed to ignore that request.

As for being pissed Vondrack , how DARE YOU! some of us are not happy with your actions. I have tried all game to get more involvement in the team and yet still you try to control everything - the foreign policy, the military, the build and movement orders, the tech choices... you have been a virtual dictator on Legoland - when I was MB you ignored my orders more than once and you tore a strip off of Zargon whenever he did anything when he played the turn in a way that you didn't like - you have done things on your own more times than I can count (giving Vox the map of Bob, agreeing to waive GoW paying for gunpowder, agreeing to give saltpeter to GoW,etc.)

As for my concerns re the foreign policy, I did raise them for discussion and Vondrack quickly cut off any debate.

	11-11-2003 16:13									#340
	Support Apolyton, pre-order Civilization IV

Alright, if there is a confusion, let's do our best to clear the air. May I ask that everybody expresses clearly what his stance is, so that we can move on, please?

My personal stance is that I want this war to end with what we decided long ago, for good reasons - with Bob divided equally between GoW & ND, RP dead or in exile on Stormia, and GS contained on Stormia. I want us to use all our power to achieve this balance of power - whatever it takes. I am stressing this, because it might include helping GoW/ND against GS if they get into troubles, but it may also include helping GoW against ND (in the unlikely case that ND betrays GoW and decides to keep all of the Bob) or helping GS against GoW/ND, if Bobians decide to invade Stormia.

My reason is that I believe this will be a setup giving us the best shot at winning the game without any needs for future overseas invasions/interventions - be them offensive (attacking someone that will have gained too much ground on Bob) or defensive (preventing someone from gaining too much ground on Bob).

The only "but" to all this is that I want us to fight and treat GS honourably - to avoid needless grudges that might hamper our post-war coexistence/cooperation. That is NOT to say I am not ready to fight them - that is to say I want everything done "by the book". No sneak attacks, no double play, no lies, no false promises, no false hopes raised. Fair fight. We have our goal. We want to achieve it. This goal collides with what they want. Bad luck. Beyond this goal, there is no hatred between our teams - just the contrary. Once our goal is achieved, we might and probably will actually get much closer, counterbalancing the combined power of Bob.

	11-11-2003 17:00									#341
	Inflate your Upload Space

quote: Originally posted by Sharpe As I said in the FAM election thread, it was me that arranged the chat not Nimitz - I would have invited in anyone who was online at the time. Several of us have asked repeated that we should talk with GS , but Vondrack has seemed to ignore that request. As for being pissed Vondrack , how DARE YOU! some of us are not happy with your actions. I have tried all game to get more involvement in the team and yet still you try to control everything - the foreign policy, the military, the build and movement orders, the tech choices... you have been a virtual dictator on Legoland - when I was MB you ignored my orders more than once and you tore a strip off of Zargon whenever he did anything when he played the turn in a way that you didn't like - you have done things on your own more times than I can count (giving Vox the map of Bob, agreeing to waive GoW paying for gunpowder, agreeing to give saltpeter to GoW,etc.)

Why don't you answer to the real concerns raised here?
Such as:
1. why did you organize a chat involving Lego's foreign policies without the knowledge of the FAM (whoever that is) and conduct it using your own personal beliefs rather than Lego's official policies?
2. why did you give away info to GS that was confidential?
3. why did you lie them ???

As for your concerns, they were discussed and rejected by the majority of the team (such as giving saltpeter to GoW; no one except you was against it). Since when is your opinion more important than mine or anyone else's in this team?

quote: As for my concerns re the foreign policy, I did raise them for discussion and Vondrack quickly cut off any debate.

Have you proposed a well thought out alternative plan and organized a poll to have it approved? The fact that you have concerns doesn't mean that they are valid or shared by the majority of people here.

	11-11-2003 17:35									#342
	Full PM-box? Change here!

quote: Originally posted by Sharpe As I said in the FAM election thread, it was me that arranged the chat not Nimitz - I would have invited in anyone who was online at the time. Several of us have asked repeated that we should talk with GS , but Vondrack has seemed to ignore that request.

See my response in the FAM election thread. If there is nothing to tell to the other party, if there is nothing else we would like them to know, there is no need to talk to them. Period.

Besides, there was no REQUEST. Two or three of our members said it might be a good idea to talk to them. Well, I believed that the message we sent them said what they needed to know. Nothing omitted, nothing extra. And in a very acceptable way.

I would like you to plainly answer my questions:

What it was you wanted to tell them?
What it was you did tell them?
What part of what you told them was approved by the team?

quote: Originally posted by Sharpe As for being pissed Vondrack , how DARE YOU! some of us are not happy with your actions. I have tried all game to get more involvement in the team and yet still you try to control everything - the foreign policy, the military, the build and movement orders, the tech choices... you have been a virtual dictator on Legoland - when I was MB you ignored my orders more than once and you tore a strip off of Zargon whenever he did anything when he played the turn in a way that you didn't like - you have done things on your own more times than I can count (giving Vox the map of Bob, agreeing to waive GoW paying for gunpowder, agreeing to give saltpeter to GoW,etc.)

Right. Wanna wage a flamewar. Cool.

"Some of you" might actually move their a$$es and finally do something for Lego. You call me a dictator? How ridiculous.

If I happen to be short of time and the turn plan does not get posted within two or three days since we play the previous one, does anyone step ahead and post one? Nope. It must always be me spending an hour or two putting everything together, so that everybody has an idea what's going to happen and so that everybody can comment, suggest, object etc. (as opposed to being a true dictator just playing turns on the fly, just maybe posting turnlogs). Note: I actually recall times where at least some of you contributed by posting turn plans or at least part of them. It was way easier for me to just put three posts together checking everything was fine and optimal, than it is to do the whole thing from scratch.

I started a GA oriented thread with detailed analyses of some of our cities - what they need, what their optimal setup would be etc. Did ANYONE helped me out there? Nope, not a single one of you - and the thread was started what, maybe two months ago? It is already off the first page because of being too old... I might remind "some of you" that there are still some 20 odd cities that might need a few minutes spent planning their future development and GA setup.

I choose techs? Huh? Since when? Can you show me anywhere where "I" eventually chose a tech that was different from what we agreed upon? SHOW ME!

I control military? Care to explain? Do you mean that it was me putting together a detailed defense plan? Which later got polished and amended according to the feedback from the rest of the team? Or do you mean that I care to shuffle units as needed when we move a garrison here or there to escort a settler or worker? WTF are you talking about? You talking about sending troops over to Bob? That was heavily discussed many times and I challenge you to point out anywhere in the forum where the eventual troop orders (or rather, the very intention to send them over) were not agreed upon by the majority of the team.

Surprised I did not like Zargon letting Legopolis riot? Surprised I did not like Zargon forgetting to start our gunpowder research? Are you serious? Will you, please, point out any other opportunity I expressed dislike with how he handled a turn? I have criticised mistakes that cost us or could have cost us, nothing else.

You say I control the foreign policy? Geeze... as the FAM, I guess I am supposed to take care of it, am I not? But there is a certain distinction between "taking care of" and "controlling". When GS lands near Yellowknife, everybody promptly suggests we should send them a message, warning, something... but again, I must put a draft together, so that others can comment and suggest changes (disclaimer: redstar did a brilliant job with his version, later on - even though only after being provoked by my version which I suspect he was not entirely happy with ) And I would like to point out that I myself later voted for including his message along with mine, as I considered it perfectly suited for the purpose.

Care to explain why it's always just me attending the chat with GoW and ND (instead of just taking rest on Thursday evening)? AFAIK, when we were there for the first time, somehow, several of our members found the time to be there. Now it's just me, with only redstar dropping in from time to time. And hardly anybody comments the chatlogs, even if I post them (it is for the first time today I hear that "some of you" weren't happy with me lowering and later cancelling the rest of the gunpowder payment for GoW - as if the gold they saved that way was not used for riders that fight GS & RP).

As soon as you start posting meaningful, well thought plans that will be more than "your concerns", I am going to consider them. But so far, I have seen very little from you. You are quick to disagree with this and that - but when it comes to doing an analysis, putting together a detailed schedule, you seem to back off.

So far, with very few notable exceptions, where I screwed by e.g. rushing too much (like the Vox map thing), I believe I was able to gain support for what I planned to do - be it economy, military, research, or foreign affairs.

If not and if what I am actually doing displeases majority of this team, I beg everybody to tell me. A solution would be just few clicks away.

	11-11-2003 19:37									#343
	Support Apolyton, buy Civilization III: Complete

quote: Originally posted by Sharpe you have been a virtual dictator on Legoland

That's completely and utterly ridiculous.

A leader? Yes. I don't know where would be Legoland now without Vondrack's involvement and hard work. (yes, hard work). Some people don't work so much for a cause even when they are on the payroll.

A dictator? If being a dictator involves working so much and always arguing with others about what has to be done and why, and receiving so little help in actually doing stuff, then never ever in my life do I want to be a dictator (not that I could ).

I brought Radek in this team and I'm sorry for him for doing it. Though admitedly he had fun sometimes and he learned much from this game, I'm sure he could have spent his spare free time in a much more enjoyable way.

Just my 2 cents. For those who deserve it.

	11-11-2003 21:15									#344
	Get a bigger avatar today!

Ok, I already had to do this once in the ISDG, looks like I'm going to have to do it here.

Vondrack: shut up.
Sharpe: shut up.
Tibierius: shut up.
Redstar:

This argument has degraded into an absolutely pointless miasma of overly harsh words. The chat happened, there is no undoing that. Perhaps it wasn't handled in the best way, but there is no undoing that either. Every other team has "unofficial" chats between members on occasion, it's just part of the game. At no point did Sharpe or Nimitz say they were officially determining Lego's position; quite the opposite: Sharpe says we are sharply () divided. Granted, some excess information was given away, but nothing that GS probably hadn't determined on their own.

As for weakening Lego's position, I think that's a bit of stretch. If GS considers this one chat the end-all, be-all of diplomatic relations with us, then they are quite dense. The relation is one that will be worked out through official channels, and is still quite fluid.

"Unplanned" chats can be risky, but they can also be quite beneficial. I know I have gained info for the team through them on occasion. If anything, this chat is a bump on the road; we'll get over it, and we'll carry on down the road to victory unhindered

	11-11-2003 21:33									#345
	Browse Apolyton AD-FREE

Whoever is the FAM, it is not good to hold chats without his knowledge. Let's say you were FAM and I told GS in a chat that they are screwed and don't have saltpeter (as apparently someone actually did). What would you think and say?

It is important to clear up these issues, otherwise it will happen again.

I'm not against unofficial chats. I'm against leaking important info in unofficial chats.

I'm not against personal views. I'm against using personal views in these chats, as opposed to agreed, official team policies.

Don't you think these issues are worth to be discussed?

Don't tell me to shut up.

	11-11-2003 21:54									#346
	Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

quote: Originally posted by ZargonX As for weakening Lego's position, I think that's a bit of stretch. If GS considers this one chat the end-all, be-all of diplomatic relations with us, then they are quite dense. The relation is one that will be worked out through official channels, and is still quite fluid.

Huh?

How do you think our harsh ultimatun sounds after the following sentence:

quote: [Theseus] So, what were your objectives for this chat? [Sharpe] We would like to avoid war with GS if possible - so to figure out if there is a way for our defensive pact with GoW NOT to be activated.

I don't want to "figure out a way out of our defensive pact", which btw is an alliance. I want to honour it. Because it is a) in our best interest and b) because it is part of a pact.

"pact = a binding and solemn agreement to do or keep from doing a specified thing"

Btw, notice the "we". We who? Sharpe and Nimitz? For GS it sounded "we, Lego", I bet. So much for an unofficial chat.

	11-11-2003 21:55									#347
	Get a bigger avatar today!

Yes, I agree these issues should be discussed, but no; I don't agree with the way they were being discussed. This was not a discussion, this was a *****-fest. If people will discuss things in a thoughtful and proper manner, I will not tell them to shut up.

	11-11-2003 21:55									#348
	Support Apolyton, buy Civilization: The Boardgame

Sorry, Z, I am not going to shut up. Is this approach you suggest something new we're going to adopt from now on? Whatever happened, happened, just get over with it, it was nothing serious (read: no biggie if it happens again)? This was not a casual chit-chat you speak of. Sharpe and Nimitz met with the current de facto leader (or primary player) of GS.

As for weakening the position: if you were GS what would you do now? GoW tells you to stuff your backstab plan up your... ND says nothing. RP is dying, consuming substantial resources of yours in the process. Lego threatens with DoW, but says they want to avoid war, and even tells you they would help you defend Stormia. Perhaps they do not really mean that ultimatum? What would you do?

I would attack, hoping I'd hit GoW hard, making them less stubborn regarding the ND backstab plan. I'd hope Lego is just bluffing, having no ace up their sleeve - and even if not, Lego stated they would not let the Bobians invade Stormia. So, if the chicken on Bob die, who cares? No big deal. Worth giving it a shot.

After this chat, considering that GoW will not agree to GS demands in thousand years, I am pretty sure GS will attack with everything they have. And our knights will have to fight.

Great. Just what everybody here wanted. And the situation looked so promising after we sent that stern warning.

It's not true that only unimportant information was disclosed to GS. The fact that we did not support an invasion of Stormia and actually "held" GoW/ND from invading was something GS would be able to figure out? Suggesting that GoW might be willing to consider a backstab also helped big time to make GS realize their efforts were futile and that they would be better off Bob...

I cannot agree to what you are saying.

But I can agree to debating our position - and letting GS know our official stance then (as if we did not make it clear with the message we sent them). Was the chat not handled the best way? Were Sharpe and Nimitz presenting their personal views only? Just an "unofficial" chit-chat? Cool. Let's determine our official position then and tell GS, explaining the whole chat was just something we did not really mean.

BTW - that's going to do miracles to our relationship.

	11-11-2003 22:00									#349
	Support Apolyton, buy Civilization III: Complete

Ok, I figure I need to respond or get killed. Vondrack whats up with you getting so upset, I was at the chat, I was there doing my best to keep it from getting official or them think we could make any thing happen. Further you held several chats while I was FAM with out talking to me, did I get upset, no that stuff happens and can be very usefull. So please every one take a step back and cool off a bit and come at this calmly, the chat had much usefull info that needs studied.

Oh, and on the point of not having an official position I am still ambassador to RP.

	11-11-2003 22:05									#350
	Support Apolyton, buy GURPS/ Alpha Centauri

Fine, let's start from here. Nimitz, lead the way.

Be so kind and post a couple of points summing up the new information we learned from the chat and we need to study now. It would be nice if you can put together a list of what GS learned and need to study now, too.

	11-11-2003 22:07									#351
	Help yourself to an AD-FREE life

I wasn't aware this was a RP chat. Sorry.

Indeed, GS learned a lot of useful info from this chat that needs to be studied.

	11-11-2003 22:17									#352
	Support Apolyton, buy Civilization III: Complete

Ok, Vondrack calm down or the team will split. all this argueing is going to far what has happened has happened it can not be changed going at each others throtes will help nothing. A reasonalbe discussion will do much more then attacking each other.

Last edited by Nimitz on 11-11-2003 at 22:37

	11-11-2003 23:11									#353
	Browse Apolyton AD-FREE

Nimitz, I was serious. You said we gained "much usefull information". Be so kind and make a summary of what we learned. Let's discuss that info.

Also, make a summary of what GS learned. Let's discuss what they are likely to do now, what they are likely to feel when this or that happens.

Lets talk about whether we do something now or whether we just let it be.

I am serious.

	11-11-2003 23:44									#354
	Tired of ads?

Agreed. Let's get a summary made of what exactly was exchanged back and forth in this chat. This will give us some talking points for future dealings with GS.

	12-11-2003 01:55									#355
	Suffering from ads?

Well, where are the on-topic comments?

I am being told to shut up, yet I am the only one who commented:
1. what the problems with chatting like this are (leaking info, using personal views, etc)
2. what is my opinion about what has been discussed in the chat (war, relation with GS, ...)

	12-11-2003 02:25									#356
	Support Apolyton, pre-order Civilization IV

quote: I am being told to shut up, yet I am the only one who commented

Allow me to rephrase: don't shut up; just change your tone. Being antagonistic isn't going to solve anything. If we're going to learn anything from this, it needs to be as a team. Sharpe and Nimitz should present their summary of what they think the chat accomplished for us, and we can debate the results.

I for one don't think too much critical info was given up. As for changing GS's plans, I don't think it will. They have a gameplan, and they'll go ahead with it. When GoW rejects the offer to backstab ND, GS will probably go ahead with its attack, and we'll have to re-issue our ultimatum. The basic issue is whether they think we'll have enough of an effect on the war to sway things against them. If they do, they'll back off. If they don't, they will attack. We should try and have an official chat soon, though, to try and clarify things that may have become muddled.

	12-11-2003 02:58									#357
	Support Apolyton or Terrorists Win

How many times do I have to repeat myself? Where are your on-topic comments?

I don't care what GS will do, I care about what we are going to do. As long as we are not going to act as a team, we are doomed.

This chat was not done in a team spirit. It was part of a personal agenda and this is why I do not agree with it; besides it wasn't handled professionally; this is why such chats should be held by the FAM; members of the team should be allowed to request such chats; etc. If everyone is allowed to talk freely with whoever they want about whatever they want, our foreign relations will be a mess very soon. So:

1. What do you think (all of you) that our team policy should be regarding non-official chats? (see my previously raised concerns: are we free to chat without the knowledge od the FAM; if yes, can we discuss freely, floating around personal ideas or do we have to follow a protocol, which means: not giving away sensitive info, follow the official stance of the team in international issues, blah blah blah)

2. I told you what I think about our alliance with GoW and ND and the GS proposed variants. (immediately after the chat). Now you tell me what do you think about it. We must have only one official stance in all this. Personal concers are to be expressed here, not in external chats.

Last edited by Tiberius on 12-11-2003 at 03:05

	12-11-2003 03:36									#358
	Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition

Well you skip a day and you miss a bunch. I'm going to pass on most of the flames, but I must comment on this "dictator" accusation. Vondrack is "leading" the team. Since he is doing a good (great?) job of it, he has wide support. He makes recommendations, lays out logical arguments, and detail plans. For the most part, the plans are right on the mark and sometimes they need some refinement. In any case, a dictator he is not and never will be.

I don't see a need for further "inter-team" discussions on our position with GS. We have debated this several times and the end result is a two team Bob (GoW and ND) and GS on Estonia only. If you don't agree with this stance, you are in the minority.

An official discussion with GS would be best. The goal of the discussion will be to re-state our position and to smooth over any misconceptions (from the chat).

During the regular weekly GoW/ND chat, the subject must be brought up and any misunderstandings smoothed out. Even if GS has not talked to GoW about the chat, they will and GoW should not have any surprises.

For the future, all members are free to have unofficial chats. As free members of this democracy, I think everyone has the right to discuss issues. When we are involved in the discussion, we must not contradict the official (approved) "position". All inferences must be "qualified" over and over ("this is not an offical stance", "I cannot agree without getting back to the team" , etc.). ALWAY REMEMBER, the true purpose of any unofficial chat is to get information, but reveal nothing and commit to nothing.

	12-11-2003 03:43									#359
	Support Apolyton or Terrorists Win

Non-Official Chats: They are going to happen. I would not in good conscience ban people on this team from speaking to people on other teams about game happenings. This is a game and people do like to talk. That said, it is fairly clear what is verbotten and what is not. Military plans, secret alliances, build plans, diplo with other teams. Also, if you are in a chat, you must make it clear right off the bat that you are speaking unofficially. When I speak to other teams, I always preface it with "I do not represent my teams official position." Any other team will understand this. It's up to them as to whether they want to keep talking to you or not.

GS Proposals: Stick with the original plan. GoW isn't going to bite, so we need to be there to back them up. The no GS on Bob policy is key. Now, of course, we have a new proposal regarding the RP "reserve," so we are going to have to re-evaluate with regards to that.

	12-11-2003 03:48									#360
	Enter the AD-FREE zone

quote: Originally posted by Tiberius 1. What do you think (all of you) that our team policy should be regarding non-official chats? (see my previously raised concerns: are we free to chat without the knowledge od the FAM; if yes, can we discuss freely, floating around personal ideas or do we have to follow a protocol, which means: not giving away sensitive info, follow the official stance of the team in international issues, blah blah blah)

I commented on this in my post, but I will briefly repeat. Yes, all members are allowed to chat with other teams. As you say, they must stay with the official policies, reveal only what is public knowledge, blah, blah, blah. Zargon stated the unofficial chats can be risky, but they are benefial...very true. The perfect diplomatic chat is one were nothing is reveal, but new information is gained.

quote: Originally posted by Tiberius 2. I told you what I think about our alliance with GoW and ND and the GS proposed variants. (immediately after the chat). Now you tell me what do you think about it. We must have only one official stance in all this. Personal concers are to be expressed here, not in external chats.

The official stance is this regard has been discussed and has not changed. The stance is a 2-team Bob (GoW/ND) and GS on Estonia only. If someone disagrees, argue all you want in the team forum.