 |
|
CiverDan
|
|
Yes, I would also move site 2 one SW to have one less square of overlap. As for site 3, this city will not grow above 6, making it useful as a unit pump only. I have no problem with one city like this, but I only want one. What are we doing with "7" from the 2 week old map in the map thread. Do we still plan on building a city there?
Personally, I would build "site 3" I sw of the location you mentioned, allowing more growth. (later) Build another city 2 SW of the "7" square. Then another 1 N OR N-NW of "14" on the river. Scrap "12" near all those mountains.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Togas
|
 |
California
Jun 2002 time: 21:26
|
|
Site 2 was placed where it was for 2 reasons: 1) to get the best growth tiles within it's initial city radius and 2) to be exactly 3 tiles from both Saragossa & Santiago.
Site 2 is a worker/settler farm by design, but is also serves an an excellent staging point for mobile units to protect all parts of Cow Valley. Site 2 is pretty much set in stone.
Site 3 was mostly set up to to steal the use of that Pamplona flood plain, as Pamplona grows rather fast without it. Site 3 is a new idea, and as I've started to become seduced by the darkside of "borg" build styles and semi-permanent city sites, I've become less detered by overlap, and focus more on immediate usage of key tiles instead of having to invest in long term city production.
Added this link to help fuel our discussion: Appropriate City Placement and City Placement redux
Should site 3 lose it's purpose as a settler factory, I would be happy for us to move it to a better long term growth spot, like more SW.
Anyhow, I do hope to see more discussion about where Site 3 should be. Please continue to discuss.
--Togas
Last edited by Togas on 11-03-2003 at 05:50
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Togas
|
 |
California
Jun 2002 time: 21:26
|
|
We need to determine which cities could squeeze in workers. I await word from the Govenors about this. I have heard from Governor Nuclear Winter that Santiago can spare workers ... as there is a great deal of crime in that city, a good source of future free labor. However, his city must first complete their city walls.
Pamplona is building 2 settlers.
Madrid has a settler coming soon.
Barcalona must first finish it's harbor, then build a settler.
Saragossa will produce military, but may be able to spare a worker.
Vigo is too new, but will be able to spare a worker after the temple is done.
Also, I ask that gem mining be put on the backburner. Instead, I ask that our slave force be put to use building a 2nd road from Vigo to the site where our floodplain city, Leon, will be, and then irrigating those 2 floodplains, then connecting the road from Leon back to Pamplona, so that we will have TWO roads to iron, in case one of them is cut in a war.
Leon will serve Spain as a settler or worker pump, and should help boost our growth. Getting it up and running quickly is my foremost concern.
--Togas
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:26. Apolyton Time is 00:26. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|