 |
|
Lancer
|
|
Oregon Coast, USA! or Bohol, Philippines!
Apr 1999 time: 05:27
|
|
The Turks pour in massive reinforcements and push the Kurds back. Turks make drive for northern oil...Kurds reel back, Turks ruthlessly press on.
Should the US get involved in the fight? On whose side?
This could be the situation that supplants coalition victory with a huge disaster. What form could that disaster take?
Game it out, where might the situation go?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lancer
|
|
Oregon Coast, USA! or Bohol, Philippines!
Apr 1999 time: 05:27
|
|
Hmm...WWIII or referee.
The US has already told the Turks that since they are not an integrated part of the coalition of the willing, that the US could not "guarantee their safety."
Is that a threat?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Proteus_MST
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Urban Ranger
Yeah, but nobody will be on the Turk's side. It will only be a regional war. |
But I think there will probably also be noone on the side of the Kurds in Iraq (which will be the real loosers of the war)
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Rufus T. Firefly
|
 |
is one way of saying it, though I prefer "mensch"
Sep 2000 time: 07:27
|
|
It won't happen. I know that's not in th spirit of a "what if" thread, but it does give me a chance to propound my latest theory about this. Right now, all of Turkey is aghast that the US has stopped asking for its help, and the government is being pilloried in the press for having blown the negotiations with the US and ending up empty-handed. My theory is that the troop movements are a form of extortion, a kind of "hey, Uncle Sam, that's a real nice war you got there; it would be a shame if anything happened to it..." If the Turks are trying, in this outrageously inaproppriate manner, to get the US back to the table, I wouldn't be a bit surprised.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
CerberusIV
|
|
I noticed a story on the BBC website that cruise missiles had been fired at territory in northern Iraq held by an extremist islamic group linked to Al-Q and suggesting that the Kurds would act with US special forces to take this group out. If so, the US stands to get more help from the Kurds than the Turks.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Rufus T. Firefly
|
 |
is one way of saying it, though I prefer "mensch"
Sep 2000 time: 07:27
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Proteus_MST
Yes, thats what the turks have nightmares about. 
That an Independent Kurdistan within Iraq would lead to the Kurds within Turkey also demanding Indepenence. |
Exactly. one thing that continues to amaze me is that the turks still haven't gotten over their War of Independence, when Turkey was invaded by 3 Great Powers (UK, France, Italy) and one pissant country with delusions of grandeur (sorry, paiktis ), and beat them all back to the seas (well, the UK just tactfully withdrew, but you get the idea; in fact, when the Turks were negotiating with the US about using bases, one condition was that they would never allow British soldiers back into the country ). Since then, the Turks have made an absolute fetish out of territorial intergrity; this is why they've been such complete bastards about Cyprus, and it's why they would never, ever let the Kurds carve an independent state out of Turkish territory.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:27. Apolyton Time is 00:27. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|