 |
|
Demerzel
|
|
considering that some people are so repressed/inexperienced at sex that its causes them psychological problems when dealing with members of the opposite sex, then I'd say this kind of thing is good.
better a few offended people then lots of stunted lives.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000 time: 22:27
|
|
I agree that any person with a properly functioning body and a partner can enjoy sex . What you do not know can be figured out pretty quickly through experimentation.
Sorry if I took your earlier comment wrong. It seemed to me you were slamming the idea of the course.
As for soc and psych, I don't buy into a lot of what goes on ( do all the people getting therapy need it really? for example) but I do accept them as legitimate fields of study.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Elok
|
 |
Land of Ramen Dragons
Mar 2003 time: 00:27
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Rufus T. Firefly
Elok, I know you feel personally insulted, but take a breath and think about what you're saying. Yes, sex is an instinct, like eating. That's a great analogy. You know why? Because Americans have probably the worst diets in the educated, industrialized world, in no small part because (1) they don't know jack about food, and (2) they mostly learn about food from the media, which seems to suggest that it's okay to exist entirely on a diet of pre-processed meat and cheese produts, followed by an obscenely sweet dessert and washed down with an absurdly caloric soft drink. No wonder we're the fattest nation on earth.
|
I'm American, and I know plenty about food. I know full well that shoving down calories of any kind will make me fat if I take too much. Most of my friends(yes, I do have them :lol are similarly aware. They print the food pyramid on the sides of cereal boxes and grocery bags, AND we get told all that stuff several times in various classes in school. The information is there; if people don't take advantage of it as it flies in their face, I say tough ****. I maintain the same for sex.
I responded to your other arguments(or at least I think I did) in my previous post, but I'd like to take this opportunity to admit that I borrowed the food analogy from C.S. Lewis's "The Four Loves." He added that, if you were to see a whole crowd of men eagerly gawking at a stage where they were slowly removing the wrapping from a hamburger, you would probably assume that those men had a problem, and not one having to do with inadequate education. The same should apply for the sexual equivalent. Our problem with sex as a society is a lot more deep-rooted than plain puritanism.
Okay, enough of the food analogy. I'm getting hungry.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Guynemer
|
|
Un****ingbelievable.
It's an elective class, for the love of all that has ever been regarded as holy by anyone who has ever lived. If you don't like the content, drop the class!
ay yi yi...
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Guynemer
|
|
I wonder if now would be the time to state that I was required to take a human sexuality class as part of the undergraduate-graduate medical school program I was in...
Quick poll. Has anyone else who has posted on this thread taken a human sexuality course in college?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Guynemer
|
|
I was also a history major.
And if you haven't taken a human sexuality course, what on earth makes you qualified to speak as to the academic merits of such a course?
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Elok
|
 |
Land of Ramen Dragons
Mar 2003 time: 00:27
|
|
Well, my mother did a report on sexuality in long-term care(i.e. nursing homes-it's not a graphic description so I escaped sans blinding mental images)...does that count?
And, as an English major, I am completely free of the wicked tyranny of facts. Actually, I'm not so sure why we're so picky that people be adequately informed about this, but not in all the other topics. Like the "what should we do in Iraq" topics. Dozens of people who get all their info from the daily news, the same wacky folks who told us Y2K would kill us all and bombard us daily with "human-interest" yellow journalism tearjerker crap--dozens of people who have probably never been to Iraq, receive no Intel reports, and spend a few minutes of their spare time thinking it over, all doing their best to second-guess people who ponder all possibilities for days and weeks at a time. That's not what I call an informed opinion, and nobody sweats it there; why here? Welcome to American debate. We conjecture, we stereotype, we make ad hominem assaults without provocation(just like I did right now, applying blanket terms to the whole American population. It's fun and easy!). If you're gonna fight that power, why doncha fight it everywhere, with consistency?
Does anyone see what I'm getting at?
I'm not sure I do. I'd better shut up now.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000 time: 22:27
|
|
I did not take the sex psych course but did see the relevant text. It was far from a course on making out and while there was a chapter on sexual positions the prof neither lectured nor tested that topic as he believed it was " the most studied chapter in the history of this university".
The remainder of the materials/lectiures were a combination of sociology and psychology. I believe there were discussions of homosexuality ( genetic vs environment arguments presented), sexual norms across cultures and across time periods, the biological processes that go into desire, sexual disfunction ( both physical and pschological), transgendered persons and on and on.
The fact that the subject matter was popular does not mean they are any less worthy of study. if a film school wanted to study pornographic films or some literature or art class decided to study comic books, thats fine too.
I don't know whether this particular class is valuable of not, I've never attended. All I am saying is that there is ample material in the field of sexual psychology/ sociology to be worth a stand-alone course. If the course is seen as easy, thats a function of the professor, not the material
Last edited by Flubber on 29-03-2003 at 03:47
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000 time: 22:27
|
|
quote: Originally posted by obiwan18
guynemer:
This is not a rhetorical question, guynemer. I want to know what are the benefits of the course.
|
Thats a tough test to meet. Heres a short list of courses that have been of no benefit to me as a lawyer
Math
Physics
Chemistry
Did that make them unworthy of study??
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Guynemer
|
|
Are you kidding, obiwan?
How did the human sexuality course help me?
Talking to patients about sexuality transmitted diseases
Talking to patients about their sexual history
Talking to patients about risk factors
Understanding the psychology of people when it comes to sexual issues
Talking to adolescents about sexuality
Talking to children about sexual abuse
Talking to women and men about rape
I could go on for another halfhour or so, but I wouldn't want to bore anyone with such useless information.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Guynemer
|
|
And how is human development obscene?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Guynemer
|
|
Obi, do you honestly think that class in Kansas is about how to "make out"? 'cuz, if so, I may just have some exciting investment opportunities to share with you.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Guynemer
|
|
Exactly why did the pictures of children border on porn?
Ordinary people might find it obscene? Sure. Ordinary people might find a lot of the content of university classes obscene. What makes that any different?
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:27. Apolyton Time is 00:27. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|