 |
|
Zylka
|
|
I'd have to say the B-52 as it will probably see almost a CENTURY of service?
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Chemical Ollie
|
 |
Bored of this board
Jan 2002 time: 06:27
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Asher
But what we do know that is because it is mechnically unstable, it has a tendancy to crash. |
Yes, if the guiding system fails, the plane is doomed. EMP, anyone?
But it now makes up the bulk of the Swedish Airforce (to which I belong) and it hasn't crashed since 1993. Or perhaps one plane was lost in a training accidident in the mid 90's, I can't remember, but such accidents happens to any warplane any time, don't they? Inexperienced pilots do mistakes. The test flight crashes were handled by an expert pilot, actually the same guy in both cases. He survived both times.
Last edited by Chemical Ollie on 30-03-2003 at 15:16
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Chemical Ollie
|
 |
Bored of this board
Jan 2002 time: 06:27
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Asher
I'm sure the systems were very advanced a long time ago, but from what I've read, it's not too advanced. Although I'm sure it's a bit dated computer-wise.
3 x 266MHz PowerPC processors, 160MB harddrive, 64MB RAM with 1MB/s databusses. |
That was the state-of-the-art computers when the plane went through final testing about 10 years ago. As I wrote, it hasn't crashed since then, so the system is doing it's job properly. You don't need the system to be more advanced than that, do you?
Last edited by Chemical Ollie on 30-03-2003 at 18:27
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:27. Apolyton Time is 00:27. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|