 |
|
MRT144
|
|
Seattle Washington
Oct 2002 time: 21:27
|
|
quote: Originally posted by DinoDoc
A good question you could ask at this point is, "Where is the money from the rest of the international community?" Reconstructing Afghanistan was never meant to be a US only affair. |
if the US wants to bring down regimes using the majority of US forces, they should fit the majority of the bill. you break it you buy it.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
gsmoove23
|
|
All of Europe gave 116mil. Netherlands alone put the US to shame.
Somebody should contribute to the website, it sucks.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
gsmoove23
|
|
France could very well make up a large part of the European Commission contribution. I was wondering why some European countries were counted twice.
Afghan recontruction is a US problem because it was an entirely US initiative which was quickly fobbed off on the UN with a miniscule contribution. Certainly the US couldn't invest any effort in building a lasting democracy in Afghanistan when it was in such a hurry to liberate Iraq.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
gsmoove23
|
|
Just saying the reconstruction is a UN problem doesn't exonerate US involvement, afterall we are a significant member of the UN and the richest member.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:27. Apolyton Time is 00:27. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|