 |
|
Static Universe
|
|
Antiquities have been swiped after wars for at least 8000 years, and guess what, civilizations still here.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
yavoon
|
|
I imagine some will be recovered, I mean how long can u wash ur hands in a 4000 year old plate before deciding maybe u should sell it?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
yavoon
|
|
to some extent I think the idea of the american military entering baghdad and immediately arresting/shooting ppl for doing civil crimes would be seen poorly by the iraqi's.
we should protect the hospitals/etc. but there's no better way to overstay ur welcome then the instant u get in to act like the dictator u just kicked out.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
yavoon
|
|
the US is protecting hospitals now. and yes a lot of hospitals have been looted.
I think ur just ready to be outraged. ur like an outrage waiting to happen and all semblance of reasonable has left.
would u prefer we simply shoot ppl who try to take crap? I mean we are pretty limited in our policing. we basically can threatan to shoot u then shoot u. we dont know the language, no1 has training in policing. the populace in general is going to be very touchy to wut it sees as american domination.
so wut? just start firing into crowds?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
GePap
|
 |
of the Big Apple
Nov 2001 time: 23:27
|
|
quote: However, kicking Saddam out of power DEFINETLY justifies the destruction of some ancient artifacts. |
that sir, is a dumb statement.
The US should have known, from previous experience, that once you removed the power of the Iraqi regime, a vacuum would open up in which looting and other mayhem could occur. They should have been prepared, since it IS the US's RESPONIBILITY, once it removed the previous power, to enforce law and protect the people of Iraq and its natural and national treasures. The Museum was NOT LOOTED simply cause the US removed Saddam: it was looted becuase the Us removed local poower without having any preparations for what would happen. The US was olbigated to secure places such as this, and it failed in that obligation.
The excuses put forward here are rather pitifull. The US is now the occupying power in Iraq: it has responsibilities under the law to fulfill. It is that simple. Figthing somewhere accross the city, given that the US has well over 50,000 men in that city, certainly more than the Baghdad police ever had, is no excuse. Even as the article points out, had US forcws simply moved a single piece of armor to a new and not radically different spot, some of the damage would have been mitigated.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Uncle Sparky
|
 |
Winnipeg
Jan 1970 time: 23:27
|
|
quote: Originally posted by JW
But the thread creator wouldn't have started this thread if, say, there was a fire there. It only because there were US troops somewhere near the building that could have possibly saved it. Hence it is the US's fault. |
Over the years, I have frequently condemned the senseless destruction of irreplaceable artifacts. With occupation, the occupying forces do under international law have certain obligations. This could have been prevented.
quote: Originally posted by Asher
I'm confused how people honestly expect ~15,000 US troops to adequately control 6M people in Baghdad, especially when they're incensed and looting like this, as well as fight against militia/suicide people...
If the people in Baghdad get their rocks off by looting their own museums, it's a tragedy, but it's their damn fault.
And whose fault is it that the Baghdad police decided to take a vacation because Saddam is AWOL? |
As I said before, I expect "the troubles" in Iraq to last for a very long time and the occupation to be a very long and unpleasant one for all involved. You'd have thought even Rumsfeld would have figured that out by now. And you're right Asher. The US will need tens of thousands of additional troops in Iraq to simply to restore order.
Last edited by Uncle Sparky on 13-04-2003 at 10:45
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:27. Apolyton Time is 00:27. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|