 |
|  |
 |
|
gsmoove23
|
|
Hey, as a change of subject, I heard recently on an NPR report (radio, no link) that some Iraqi electrical engineers are claiming that it was the US who cut electricity before Baghdad fell. Supposedly, they say, the Americans dropped fiberglass dust on the generators or something which would have shorted out the equipment. The reporter said that this was the same technique used in Bosnia? Never heard of this before, has anyone? I've been looking for a story of it in print with no luck.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Traianvs
|
 |
Belgium, land of plenty (corruption)
Jan 2000 time: 06:27
|
|
quote: Originally posted by SpencerH
Gee thats a surprise. Did you figure we fought (and are still fighting) a war for whats important to archeologists?
Any soldier standing guard in a hostile city is at risk. You may not have noticed, but american forces are still under fire in and around Baghdad.
Yeah there's no way a bunch of somali's with AK-47's would take on the american army.
Good we'll send you over and you can stand post. There's no risk, right! |
What lame answers are these... If you get lame then I go lame as well..
-I'm not the one who started this war, I'm not the one who let Iraqis simply plunder the museum without any trouble, and I'm certainly not a soldier, so as to why I would go up there is kinda puzzling for me, Belgium is not at war anyway. I've also never shot a gun or any of the kind (You see what dorky things you are saying? perhaps now you understand)
-About the Somalis.. well the Somalis were not museum looters you know, perhaps you didn't know, but they were actually troops of a Somali Warlord!!! So first thing you need to know is: a soldiers kills people and fires guns, a looter on the other hand is trying to obtain valuable objects and usually won't fire guns, I've never seen a museum plunderer that wields guns anyway. Secondly, in Mogadishu, the Americans were seriously outnumbered, on top of that the Somalis had terrain advantage and the Americans were attacking, which is always harder than defending as you have to lure your enemies out to shoot them. Now here, the looters are "attacking" and if they DO have guns, would they do that against a 300,000 numbering force with the best weapons in the world etc etc??
I don't think so
-A soldier standing guard may be at risk, but I never said they would have to stand wide open to enemy fire, standing in the hallway blocking all entrances would do the trick, also check my previous point.
-Last thing: Sure we're not waging a war for archaeologists on the contrary, all a war can do is damage things (and that's what these gulf wars have done to ancient sites and now, this museum as well). Weird that you think I don't know that.
What a lame discussion man, bring up some real arguments, or give up. You're wrong and you know it.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
yavoon
|
|
traj just to be sure, u do realize it was theft right? cuz it still sounds like u think a bunch of wild iraqis carrying pitchforks took everything.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
gunkulator
|
|
It's still my opinion that if Iraq comes out of this thing with a better gov't, then that's worth the price of every single old doodad in that museum. I find it ironic that people are complaining that civilization is gone whilst ignoring the possibility that this is a pivotal moment for a nation to throw off its barbarian past and embrace a more civilized future.
But then again, it's always far easier to biatch and focus on the negative.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:27. Apolyton Time is 00:27. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|