 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Proteus_MST
|
|
I considered the War in Afghanistan as justified.
Aside from being a regime which destroyed one of the Wonders of the World (the Buddha Statues) and suppressed women it could also be proven without much doubt that the Taliban had a Link to a worldwide Terror Organization and supported them by all means possible.
In the light of this and the high probability that it was just this Terror Organization the Taliban protected, which conducted the attacks on the WTC, I saw a casus belli as given.
Of course on the aftermath I see also many broken promises and some points to criticize. It was for example prior to war promised to the Afghani, that they would receive lots of money for the reconstruction and would get help in every way possible to build their society.
But the US-Troops which could help Karzai to project his power to the different regions of the Country and therefore help him to control the warlords are to busy seeking terrorists than to do other constructive things.
And just at the beginning of this year a grant of 300 Mio US-$ which would have helped the Afghani in their reconstruction efforts, was rejected by the US-Congress.
Last edited by Proteus_MST on 04-05-2003 at 20:57
|
|
|  |
 |
|
TCO
|
 |
Richmond, VA
Jan 1970 time: 00:27
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Osweld
So you supplied warlords with weapons and ammo, fueling the the ongoing civil war, invaded the country and leveled it with bombs, killing thousands of people, just to catch a handfull of people? Good job.
Atleast you gave something for the next generation to do, I'm sure there's thousands more children who've had their parents and friends killed by the american imperialists who will grow up and fly another plane into a building or blow themselves up so we can all do it over again. |
Well that is one point of view. I guess one point of view says that if we couldn't do the damage to Afgh, that we did, we should have just stayed out of it. (Of course, you are also the guy who said that there should be a 0% rate of collateral damage in bombing attacks.)
We decided to take the opposite point of view. That ignoring the problem is percieved as weakness and that it is better to be aggressive about countermeasures. Time will tell who is right. But I believe that when you touch a nettle, you should grasp it firmly.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:27. Apolyton Time is 00:27. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|