 |
|
Comrade Tassadar
|
|
What will we do if someone wishes/does defect?
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Static Universe
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Maniac
But when does inside knowledge become useless? I mean, even if the traitor has to wait a month, probably only six turns or so will have passed. I doubt there will be much change in that short period. I'd propose that defections are only allowed if the faction to which the person defects already has infiltrated the faction from which the person defects. Anything else is too unfair for the victim faction. |
I would say that long term strategic planning is the more valuable info that a defector will take with him, regardless of infiltration-type data. Six turns probably won't put a dent in that's value, or at least will force major changes in gameplay on the part of the faction defected from, which isn't really fair.
I say disallow it completely or take it on a case by case basis if it must happen.
Edit: for clarity
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Drogue
|
 |
Omnipresent conscience
Oct 2002 time: 05:28
|
|
And we are so perfect, severing the link to the collective could damage the individual. I say be realistic, if someone defects, they are wanted by others because of the info they carry. Let them defect and use that knowlegde, but you can only defect to a faction you've had relations with (thus you know they exist) but you're free to share info then.
This could be very stupid, but I think most of us are happy with our teams, and want to stay. But realistically, if youn defect, you have that knowledge, and if the other faction wanted to use it, they would. To be honest, I'm not really sure, but either could be fun.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Drogue
|
 |
Omnipresent conscience
Oct 2002 time: 05:28
|
|
An interesting thought, Comrade Tassadar. So would blind love, that causes one to harm their intended lover, not be an imotion, as it is devoid of logic? Would the hatred of another, that causes one to commit crimes, ending up killed or in prison, be not emotions, for they are illogical and irrational? Do you disregard Hume's position that quote: Reason cannot give rise to moral judgments | (that emotion can) or Stoicism, which states that quote: Morality is simply rational action, of reason alone | ? Both of those would seem to believe that you can have logic while not having emotion, and vice versa.
As the CyCon leader, I speak of Stoicism with much reverance, even being incapable of illogical emotion.
"Questions and Answers about Meditations" by Prime Function Beta-8
Last edited by Drogue on 13-05-2003 at 22:31
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:28. Apolyton Time is 00:28. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|