 |
|  |
 |
|
Lazarus and the Gimp
|
 |
Whale-raping abomination
Aug 2000 time: 05:28
|
|
quote: Originally posted by *End Is Forever*
I don't get it Alex. On one hand, you're saying "who took away the grant?" and on the other "how can you afford to abolish fees?". I know you've got a natural aversion to Conservative governments, but really...
I could ask "which party presided over massive expansion of the higher education sector to the point where it was no longer simply the sole preserve of the upper classes?" but I don't think you'd like the answer much.
As for the poll tax, that has about as much relevence to today's Conservative Party as the three-day week does, and as much as unilateral disarmament has to the present Labour Party. |
Aha. 3rd time lucky. I don't support the fact that tuition fees have to be paid, just as I didn't support the abolition of grants. I'd restore grants, and fund them through Income tax.
How would the Tories fund it? Will you answer this one on the third attempt? You see, presenting the Tories as "Friends of the Students" is like presnting the Tsetse Fly as the friend of sub-Saharan livestock farming.
Oh yes? I like the way you put "presided over massive expansion", which is a useful spin on "Didn't do much, really". Which party started the ball rolling, however?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
DanS
|
 |
Kickball Capital of the World
Jan 1970 time: 00:28
|
|
You can't live on it and it barely covers your rent now, and it never did when I was at uni either.
Why not just up those limits slightly to take increased living expenses and tuition into account? Rework the means test slightly, so that it doesn't majorly impair an average parent's spending habits? It is such a long-term asset that a payment period of 30 years or more could be justified.
Last edited by DanS on 15-05-2003 at 22:18
|
|
|  |
 |
|
DanS
|
 |
Kickball Capital of the World
Jan 1970 time: 00:28
|
|
but we're back at the vexed question of debt
Why is that a vexed question? Many people have a home mortgage and seem to do just fine. An education is a longer-term asset than a house, so could pay the loan out over an even longer period than for houses, and based on individual circumstances.
Fair point, those loans are government run and very low interest though.
I don't have any problem with a subsidized and synthetic student loan market. We have the same over here. Or rather, many of the loans are sold by banks, then they are bought, packaged and securitized by Sallie Mae, a government/public corporation, which in turn sells the resulting securities to big investors like Sten. Long story short, there is lots of government involvement, but it's a market solution, by and large.
Interest accrues during your time in school, but you don't have to pay it back while in school. You get 6 months grace once you're out of school. If you go back to school full time for another degree, payment obligation is suspended.
You can do all sorts of things to reduce the hardships and inequities in a loan-based system, if you are so inclined.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:28. Apolyton Time is 00:28. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|