 |
|
ixnay
|
|
ACS Staff: 'RoN' Content Editor
|
 |
I <3 etna, omg disgaea fag
Jan 1970 time: 22:28
|
|
Yes, in what seems to be an annual thing now, this thread will contain a compilation of all the leader graphics for the 8 new civs in Conquests. Not much at first here, but as new info is released, I'll add it.
Attachment: conquests1.png
This has been downloaded 292 time(s).
Last edited by ixnay on 07-11-2003 at 03:26
|
|
|  |
 |
|
ixnay
|
|
ACS Staff: 'RoN' Content Editor
|
 |
I <3 etna, omg disgaea fag
Jan 1970 time: 22:28
|
|
Second batch of 3 civs.
Attachment: conquests2.png
This has been downloaded 261 time(s).
Last edited by ixnay on 07-11-2003 at 03:27
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Elden
|
|
Gilgamesh should be in Ancient (his background is the same as Hannibal's ancient background).
Also Mursilis is the spelling not Mursalis.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Elden
|
|
quote: Originally posted by History Guy
Elden,
You're right about Mursilis, but I don't think so where Gilgamesh is concerned. How many ancient Sumerians ran around dressed like that? It's too medieval. Besides, that isn't the same background. |
Look at the picture of Hannibal at http://www.civ3.com/ptw_prof_carth.cfm then look at Gilgamesh again or better yet at his larger preview in the Conquests screenshots section at civ3.com, after doing that tell me they are not the same.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Nakar Gabab
|
|
of Pedantic Nitpicking
May 2001 time: 00:28
|
|
Alright, everybody with me here:
Sargon can't be the Sumerian leader because Sargon was an Akkadian.
And the Akkadian Empire is entirely different from the Sumerian Empire, blah blah blah. You get the picture.
Still, it's going to be odd having the Sumerians, Babylonians, Persians, AND Arabs in effectively the same place.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Boris Godunov
|
 |
Portland, OR
Aug 2001 time: 00:28
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Nakar Gabab
Alright, everybody with me here:
Sargon can't be the Sumerian leader because Sargon was an Akkadian.
And the Akkadian Empire is entirely different from the Sumerian Empire, blah blah blah. You get the picture.
|
This is quibbling. It is like saying James I can't be considered an English king because he was from Scotland.
Sargon was from Akkad, but he ruled over Sumeria for 54 years, which was quite a hefty timespan. And I doubt Akkad was that much culturally different from Sumeria, although they were Semitic peoples.
Considering the liberties they take with other rulers (Joan of Arc, Hannibal), having Sargon as their ruler wouldn't be inappropriate, and it would be recognizing history's first great conqueror. It would seem to me more appropriate than Gilgamesh, who never ruled over all of Sumeria, but was just the king of one city-state.
Last edited by Boris Godunov on 22-05-2003 at 19:01
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Elden
|
|
quote: Originally posted by History Guy
Elden, it isn't the same. Look closer, there is clearly an ocean behind Hannibal. Behind Gilgamesh, there is clearly...a wall! They are not the same. |
The wall is also there for Hannibal.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Elden
|
|
I'm glad I didn't make a mistake but I hope they haven't recycled any other leaderheads.
Last edited by Elden on 09-11-2003 at 10:12
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:28. Apolyton Time is 00:28. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|