17-05-2003 02:26									#1
	American/European dates? Browse Apolyton AD-FREE

No, I'm not talking about "you just met a girl/guy, you'd like to date"

I'm talking about the differences in how dates are written:

In Denmark (and other European countries), we write our dates with dd-mm-yyyy (d = day, m = month... you get the idea ), while in America (and probably other countries too), they write their dates in some completely different way... I think it's yyyy-mm-dd, but sometimes I also see it like mm-dd-yyyy...

This has annoyed me pretty much lately, since I'm doing my first examen project for school, where we should do the programming our-self. One of the worst hurdles we had, was this date thing... it was pretty diffecult to get it working, because we were programming our program on an english OS, with english apps and such, but the program should be designed to danes (meaning: we should be sure to use danish dates). It took us ages to find some way, to make this program work... though I believe this program wont work on danish computers, because we wrote the program to english computers... (None of our teachers knew how to get rid of this 'date' problem...)

I think this is pretty annoying, and believe it should be changed. I see a problem, when talking to Americans, and talking about e.g. "let's talk again this date", and then they give some date e.g. "05-04-03"... I know I'm not always aware of this problem, so I could easily see this as April 5th 2003, while others see this as May 4th 2003

Should this be changed? If so: Who should change?

	17-05-2003 02:33									#2
	Tired of ads?

You may as well have just had a poll asking who is European and who is American, because all the Euros will vote for dd-mm-yy and all the Ameris mm-dd-yy.

	17-05-2003 02:34									#3
	Full PM-box? Change here!

Day-Month-Year. Logical sense as it's the smallest unit ascending to the largest unit.

	17-05-2003 02:35									#4
	Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

dd-mm-yyyy. dd-mm-yyyy. Damn, that doesn't make much of a chant, now does it?

Hm. deedee-emem-waiwaiwaiwai. deedee-emem-waiwaiwaiwai. It does, actually.

	17-05-2003 02:36									#5
	Lose 30 kilos (of popups)

The problem is how they're read.

mm-dd-yy makes more sense for Americans because days are described as, say "April 1st, 2003" rather than "1 April, 2003", which sounds just...ridiculous.

	17-05-2003 02:37									#6
	Support Apolyton, buy Call to Power 2

Month-day-year.

	17-05-2003 02:41									#7
	Support Apolyton, buy GURPS/ Alpha Centauri

In what way does "1st of April, 2003" sound any more ridiculous than "April 1st, 2003"?

	17-05-2003 02:42									#8
	Lose 30 kilos (of popups)

quote: Originally posted by Rogan Josh You may as well have just had a poll asking who is European and who is American, because all the Euros will vote for dd-mm-yy and all the Ameris mm-dd-yy.

Not necessary... I was close on voting mm-dd-yy, because I often talk to not-European people anyway... so I kinda got used to the other thing anyway...

	17-05-2003 02:43									#9
	Browse Apolyton AD-FREE

quote: Originally posted by Asher The problem is how they're read. mm-dd-yy makes more sense for Americans because days are described as, say "April 1st, 2003" rather than "1 April, 2003", which sounds just...ridiculous.

I agree with the slut here

	17-05-2003 02:44									#10
	Support Apolyton, buy Civilization: The Boardgame

Yep, in durch you 1 april, 2003, doesn't sound too foolish to me

	17-05-2003 02:51									#11
	Support Apolyton, buy Call to Power 2

I prefer dd-mm-yyyy in general and common use such as dating letters.

yyyy-mm-dd is more useful when archiving, referencing or other somesuch.

	17-05-2003 03:06									#12
	Support Apolyton, buy Civilization 2

yyyy-mm-dd should be the norm in anything that demands precision (such as a program, archives, etc). It is the most rational way by far.
For the daily use of dates, I think people should stick to whatever they're used to. When I'm talking on 'Poly (i.e to Yanks and Euros), I say dates in full letters anyway, for everybody to understand.

	17-05-2003 03:09									#13
	Browse Apolyton AD-FREE

Okay...monarchs. We have Charles I, Elizabeth II, Louis XIV. Not 1st Charles, 2nd Elizabeth, 14th Louis.

World Wars. We have World War I and World War II, not 1st of World Wars and Second of World Wars (yeah, some historians call it "the first world war" to sound special, but that doesn't count)

Movie sequels. We have Rocky II, Star Wars IV, not 2nd of Rocky, 4th of Star Wars.

Fighter jets...we have the F-14, F-15, F-16. Not the 14-F, 15-F, 16-F.

I could go on....but...you say the thing first, and then the number that it uses. That's just the natural way to do things. Why do those crazy Europeans insist on just messing it up for dates?

	17-05-2003 03:10									#14
	Help yourself to an AD-FREE life

yyyy-mm-dd makes the most sense. First the most significant unit, then the lower. We also don't say, that it's 28 minutes, 35 seconds of the 11th hour, do we?

	17-05-2003 03:12									#15
	Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations

quote: Originally posted by Giant_Squid World Wars. We have World War I and World War II, not 1st of World Wars and Second of World Wars (yeah, some historians call it "the first world war" to sound special, but that doesn't count)

Actually, both in German and Russian "First World War and Second World War" are the right order of words. Besides, I don't see what this has to do with dates.

	17-05-2003 03:17									#16
	Support Apolyton, buy Civilization 2

quote: Originally posted by Starchild Day-Month-Year. Logical sense as it's the smallest unit ascending to the largest unit.

Except no one says, "12 January, 2003." We say "January 12, 2003."

MM-DD-YY mirrors spoken language, so makes the most sense.

	17-05-2003 03:17									#17
	Support Apolyton or Terrorists Win

quote: Originally posted by Asher The problem is how they're read. mm-dd-yy makes more sense for Americans because days are described as, say "April 1st, 2003" rather than "1 April, 2003", which sounds just...ridiculous.

Oops, beat me to it.

	17-05-2003 03:19									#18
	Help yourself to an AD-FREE life

quote: Originally posted by Starchild In what way does "1st of April, 2003" sound any more ridiculous than "April 1st, 2003"?

Who do you know that, when asked the date, says "Oh, it's 1st of April!" as opposed to "It's April 1st!" Simplicity is best, and the "of" is totally unneccessary. It's a whole word no one need say.

	17-05-2003 03:22									#19
	Support Apolyton, buy Civilization III: Complete

quote: Originally posted by Apocalypse I agree with the slut here

I told you the dates on AIM, I didn't expect you to broadcast them to everyone on Poly...

As far as people here are concerned, I'm a hermit.

	17-05-2003 03:23									#20
	Increase the size of your Attachments

quote: Originally posted by Sir Ralph Actually, both in German and Russian "First World War and Second World War" are the right order of words. Besides, I don't see what this has to do with dates.

Same in French, as well as the French order of words in dates is dd-mm-yy (still more rational than the jam in use in the US, even though it is not perfect).

	17-05-2003 03:27									#21
	Suffering from ads?

Ahh, but you see neither German or Russian nor even French are the de facto world language so guess who's going to win in this dispute?

	17-05-2003 03:40									#22
	Enter the AD-FREE zone

quote: Originally posted by Boris Godunov Who do you know that, when asked the date, says "Oh, it's 1st of April!" as opposed to "It's April 1st!"

Me. I tend to use both, it just depends what comes out first. I think dd-mm-yyyy is best, because it's from smallest to biggest. And GS: Euro's messing up the date? IIRC, we had it first, and Americans decided to change it. Although I could be wrong

	17-05-2003 03:42									#23
	Get a bigger avatar today!

quote: Originally posted by Asher I told you the dates on AIM, I didn't expect you to broadcast them to everyone on Poly... As far as people here are concerned, I'm a hermit.

Hey, I didn't tell anyone why you were a slut...you did that just now.

Come on, people change...you don't have to be a hermit here forever.

	17-05-2003 03:42									#24
	Increase Your PM Length

Day-month-year, it's the most logical.

I say either "The 1st of April" or "April the 1st", but never ever "April 1st".

And it is "The First World War" and the "The Second World War".

What are those thingies in the American constitution called, those amendments? Amendment 1st? Amendment 2nd?

If you have children do you have a 2nd son, or a son 2nd?

When trying to pass a driving test, do you have attempt third, or a third attempt?

When playing golf, is there hole 18th, or an 18th hole?

Can one be second best, or best second? Third last, or last third?

	17-05-2003 03:43									#25
	Support Apolyton, buy Call to Power 2

quote: Originally posted by Oerdin Ahh, but you see neither German or Russian nor even French are the de facto world language so guess who's going to win in this dispute?

Nope, that would be English. And you know what we use over here. Although many would argue that their isn't a world language, since we still all speak our own, and English still isn't the most popular IIRC.

	17-05-2003 03:45									#26
	Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition

And to think I thought this was a relationship thread. I apparently forgot where I was.

	17-05-2003 03:49									#27
	Support Apolyton

quote: Originally posted by Sandman Day-month-year, it's the most logical. I say either "The 1st of April" or "April the 1st", but never ever "April 1st". And it is "The First World War" and the "The Second World War". What are those thingies in the American constitution called, those amendments? Amendment 1st? Amendment 2nd? If you have children do you have a 2nd son, or a son 2nd? When trying to pass a driving test, do you have attempt third, or a third attempt? When playing golf, is there hole 18th, or an 18th hole? Can one be second best, or best second? Third last, or last third?

So is she Second Elizabeth, or Elizabeth the Second?

	17-05-2003 03:54									#28
	Help yourself to an AD-FREE life

"April third" is ungramatical, at least if you're intending for the quantifier to be a component of the month. You don't say "the highjumper third attempt", you say "the highjumper's third attempt" or "the third attempt of the highjumper", ie. "April's third" would work, but then we don't use months that way. So language favours the europeans.

I still think they're wrong, because obviously the most natural way is to do it like time or weight or length, largest unit first, ie. yy-mm-dd. AFAIK sweden is the only country that has it standardised this way. I'm born in 810610 (åttiett nollsex tio) myself.

	17-05-2003 03:54									#29
	Support Apolyton, buy Civilization 2

She's Elizabeth THE Second, not Elizabeth Second.

On day third, Christ rose again.

In the future, there will be Coming Second.

	17-05-2003 03:57									#30
	Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition

quote: Originally posted by Boris Godunov So is she Second Elizabeth, or Elizabeth the Second?

Oh, you're introducting another word now, "the"? Which is shorter, "the" or "of"?

Another european advantage- if you want to clarify the number of the month while speaking you can do so, ie. "third of the fourth". This is clearly impossible using the American system.