 |
|  |
 |
|
Shi Huangdi
|
 |
Pittsburgh, PA
Apr 1999 time: 00:28
|
|
"I knew a couple of students who dropped out because they couldn't put up with the racism in the school. "
If they can't deal with racism in school, how are they going to deal with racism, or any other sort of nastiness out there? College is if anything a less racist environment then real world. Personally, I've yet to meet a racist student or teacher.
Use common sense. If someone who is admitted to school with lower academic qualifications then the student body in general, isn't it more likely they won't do as well? Now, some people do become better students in college then they were in HS, but I would think on a whole the same students who were good in HS would be likely to also be in college.
In any case, I really don't find an unwelcoming environment a good excuse for poor academic performance or dropping out. At the High School Level, there are some kids who are out victimized and target for every sort of nastiness imaginable, but they don't drop out and often times these kids do better academically then the population as a whole?
"There were only a handful of African-Americans in mainstream institutions of higher learning 40 years ago. Some were admitted but most could not attend due to past depravation of educational opportunity and lack of financial resources. The affect of "legacies" is tremendously skewed in favor of whites."
But not all white have legacies, and if you give advantages to the whites with legacies and then the minorites with AA, you are leaving behind the impoverished white. Economics is by far the most important variable here, racism is not.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
TOUGHUSAGUY
|
|
THE NEGORES DONT UNDERSTAND THAT SLAVERY WAS IN MANY WAYS GOOD FOR THEM - FREE EDUCATION AND GOING TO A SUPER RICH COUNTRY WHERE THEY WOULD BE MUCH MORE RICHER THEN IF THEY STILL BE IN AFRICA!
OF COURSE NO TO THE AFFIRMATIVE ACTION THE STUPID LIBERALS WANT JUST BECAUSE IT!
USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA USA!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Zylka
|
|
EVERYONE WHO WAS THE 50TH INDUCTEE TO THE POLY HALL OF FAME POST BELOW!!!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Zylka
|
|
That stupid fatass UberKruX, or maybe Sava
neither of them know how to come up with an original gig!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MRT144
|
|
Seattle Washington
Oct 2002 time: 21:28
|
|
said by roy ayers on 2000 black people:
gotta think about your future and forget about your past cause all the things you lived before cant be lived again.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Arrian
|
 |
Kneel before Grog!
Jul 2001 time: 00:28
|
|
Well intentioned, but ultimately reverse racism and counterproductive, IMO.
Plus, if it IS a good idea and is working, then at some point the time will come to end it, right?
Obviously racism is still a problem for our society. However, it seems to me that things have improved considerably and continue to do so.
The racism that remains in America, as I see it, is a very personal, individual thing. Personal, individual things are difficult to combat via legislation. We've done away with institutionalized racism. The attempt is made to actively combat prejudice via education (though I think more work is necessary here... it's my opinion that education is the most valueable weapon we have against racism). But it seems to me that few people really change their views on something as big as race - change occurrs, by and large, by generation. How many generations have we gone through since the 60s?
I'm not saying that the current situation is acceptable - status quo is fine. I also completely understand the argument that one shouldn't have to wait for fairness (especially since the unfairness goes back hundreds of years at this point). But the rational side of me says that combatting unfairness with unfairness is creating other problems, even if it solves the one it's trying to solve.
I understand why AA was thought up. I think its goal is a noble one. But the methods suck.
-Arrian
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Albert Speer
|
|
Puerile Polemic
Mar 1999 time: 00:28
|
|
Actually, this thread is dead wrong...
the reason why AA still exists today is no longer to improve economic oppurtunities but rather for 'diversity' in colleges. People didn't notice the change over the years in the basis for AA that those supporting it have said?
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:28. Apolyton Time is 00:28. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|