 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Serb
|
|
Siberia, Communist party of Apolyton
Nov 2001 time: 11:28
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Cruddy
And it's not going to happen with the 2nd strike capabilities of Europe and Israel. Putting missies onto subs kind of removes this option, doesn't it? |
Why it removes this option? I didn't say that Europe's second strike wouldn't harm Russia. I just said that 10% of our Satans is enough to wipe-out life from Europe.
quote: Despite how much you seem to enjoy the prospect of a nuclear holocaust. |
It wasn't me who started it. or it was I?
quote: All currently deployed anti-missile systems are limited to the intercept limit specified in the ABM treaty from the 70s. |
What kind of threaty are you talking about? Yanks broken this agreement not so long ago. We're fell free to create our new AB defense. S-300 already has limited anti-ICBM capabilities. It could shot down all aircrafts/cruise missiles within 150 Km range and ICBMs within 40Km range. So, we already ahve something that Yanks only trying to create right now (using S-300 technology btw, they ""bought" (thanks to our local motherf*ckers", as for me I call it thievery) S-300 from on of the Ukrainian firms not so long ago.
quote: I suspect the majority of such shielding has been done with the idea of protecting against nearby detonations, not deliberate targetting of the individual unit. Complete hardening against such deliberate targetting is almost impossible - too many variables (HOW big is the nuke, HOW close does it detonate, atmospheric conditions, etc etc - all without a single field test). |
Absolutely agreed. And I never said otherwise. All I said that our eqipment is resistant to EMP, not that's invulnerable to EMP. And my second point was that to make our equipment less resistant we actally should re-design it and make it more expensive, not more chaep as Panag believe.
And btw, such things as resistance to EMP could be pretty well calculated. We still have a national standart for such thing as resistance EMP on our rail roads. In my university diplom project entire chapter was dedicated to protection from EMP.
quote: As far as being 30 years behind in satellite launch tec, all I can say is the Israelis are not competing for a slice of the commercial market. They are just developing for their own needs. As such, any comparison is futile and childish. |
IK don't know dude, first Azazel started poll about Neutron bombs, then Panag started his speeeches about Israelis ICBMs...I'm telling you, they are planning something.

|
|
|  |
 |
|
panag
|
 |
MY WORDS ARE BACKED WITH BIO-CHEMICAL WEAPONS
Oct 2000 time: 07:28
|
|
double post
Last edited by panag on 24-05-2003 at 20:57
|
|
|  |
 |
|
panag
|
 |
MY WORDS ARE BACKED WITH BIO-CHEMICAL WEAPONS
Oct 2000 time: 07:28
|
|
quote: Originally posted by panag
hi ,
why on earth would i put quotes from a site if you can read it yourself , ....
as for topol , you should look around , ..... anyone can find it , ..... 
plenty of points in there , or are you a coward and dont go there , .... for some such language is a persoanl insult , be carefull to call people a coward , .....
as for the yanks , where would you be today if the us of a would not spend its taxpayers dollars on the ailling soviet and other ex states , ......
or you did not know about that one neither , ..... 
have a nice day |
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:28. Apolyton Time is 00:28. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|