 |
|
Edan
|
|
quote: Originally posted by PLATO1003
TERROR LEVEL HIGH...terror level moderate...TERROR LEVEL HIGH...terror level moderate...TERROR LEVEL HIGH...etc...
Is this system losing its effectiveness? |
While I'm not a fan of the system, this is only the third time it's being raised in 20 months.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Edan
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Lorizael
And before 9/11, how many times had the US been attacked by foreign terrorists on US soil?
|
Well, the '93 WTC attack and the attempted attack on LAX during the millenium cellebration that was stopped come first to mind, although there were a number of smaller attacks before then, IIRC. Hmm. Does an attack on a US embassy count as an attack on US soil?
quote:
I say US soil because it is Homeland Security. Homeland Security shouldn't apply to anything but that which occurs within the borders of the United States. |
Sometimes the terrorists aren't obliging enough to inform the US where they're planning to carry out their terror attacks. The times they've increased the level was due to an increase in chatter between terrorists, simmilar to what was seen in the days before 9/11. And I would think it better that the government be safe and inform the people of that increased chatter (even through silly color systems) than to not inform the public - I mean, it's not as if they've been doing this every other week - just 3 times in 20 months.
(Homeland security shouldn't also apply to domestic terrorists?)
Last edited by Edan on 21-05-2003 at 03:36
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:28. Apolyton Time is 00:28. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|