 |
|  |
 |
|
Pekka
|
 |
em seu burro dos pais!
Feb 2002 time: 07:28
|
|
Interesting indeed. I can't see why they would keep grudge them being in UN peacekeeping in Afghanistan, because then they'd have to attack pretty many countries. Norway however is a member of NATO, so that might be one, and they did attack with fighter as you said. Other than that, I can't figure out why.. because if those are the reasons, then they should be threatning whole bunch of countries. Although I'm not from Norway, I'd hate to see any attacks there because it would feel like we would be under attack too.. Mind you we share a border and are small countries. Less distance than inside Texas.
I hope they don't ever plan on doing it, because it will make us super mad. We go absolutely ballistic about it but we couldn't act on it. Though, I'm NOT sure, but I think Norway IS our military ally.. Not sure. I think they are? I think we have some kind of 'you attack one of us, you attack all of us' thing? I believe we might have one.. so maybe.. maybe we could retaliate and kill bunch of fundies after that, I don't know but I hope so if they attack. They attack Norway, they attack us.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Cruddy
|
|
I would guess this is a target of opportunity. Some other country's active cells have been arrested or disrupted - so carrying out this sort of attack is perhaps all they can do for the moment.
Mind you, I'm not sure if this is organised team or a lone indepenant.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Pekka
|
 |
em seu burro dos pais!
Feb 2002 time: 07:28
|
|
Cruddy, that might be true, but it would be bad move. In here, well they don't have support, but we're not biggest supporters of the US and the war on terrorism. We are not against it, but we're more neutral than many other countries. So attacking us would only mean more support for the US and big support for the war on terrorism, against them. If they want to go on and make the whole world really angry at them, I can't see why it's a smart move. We are small, but together we are force to be reckoned with, and they will meet whole lot of pain, suffering and death if they wish so. I think even threatning us publicly should be punished with whole bunch of dead fundies.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Cruddy
|
|
Just what is this thread based on? I'm commenting here and I have no idea what this event is you're talking about?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Cruddy
|
|
Maybe it is an embedded code word, ie "carry out plan codenamed Norway".
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Cruddy
|
|
Possible attack on North Sea oil? Bit obvious really.
I suspect the translation; "healing your breasts".
Full text hree if you want this crap can be accessed from the above link - I tried posting the URL and it sparks a spybot.
Last edited by Cruddy on 22-05-2003 at 06:18
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Cruddy
|
|
SOAB. Altered post, you can get the text off of the first link. Thanks Oerdin.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lord Merciless
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
You know why? Probably because of the 'OSLO Accords'. To fundy's this was a sell out by the Palestinians. Therefore it would be symbolic if they struck at Oslo. |
That must be the reason!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Eli
|
|
Israel
Jul 2000 time: 07:28
|
|
Told you.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Richelieu
|
|
Gatineau
Dec 2001 time: 00:28
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Cruddy
Maybe it is an embedded code word, ie "carry out plan codenamed Norway". |
"... blessent mon coeur d'une langueur monotone."
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
MichaeltheGreat
|
|
Apolyton Grand Executioner
|
 |
mooning the house that Ruth built.
Oct 1999 time: 21:28
|
|
Why is pretty simple.
1) Read Sayyid al Qutb or al Maududi - all infidels are targets, as are all Moslems who do not strictly follow the Qu'ran and Sharia law.
2) Constantly focusing on limited targets with high alert levels constrains their ops into high risk, low probability of success.
3) Expanding their target focus globally means that a lot of (fixed) intelligence and law enforcement assets will now have to look and listen at a lot more potential operators in a lot more potential target areas. The result is either dilution of existing intel assets, or the need to spend more money (in rough economic times) to train, equip and support more intel and LE assets.
4) The political effects are no lose: Either greater unification of the infidel world and more propaganda for a truly global jihad, or else smaller countries will isolate themselves more from western policy, and try to appease terrorists. Global jihad between radical Islam and the rest of the world is what these *******s want - go back to point 1 and read al Qutb and al Maududi. Isolation of the US and key enemies, or appeasement, helps as well, they just have to change their tune a bit.
5) Getting ops thwarted and busted repeatedly isn't good for fundraising or morale. Picking on previously unsuspected targets let's them demonstrate some form of global reach and operational success.
6) This is also an economic war - as has been referenced by OBL and AAZ in the past. Increased security is costly, and hinders the free movement of people and commerce.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:28. Apolyton Time is 00:28. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|