 |
|  |
 |
|
gsmoove23
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Oerdin
I'm not going to write a research paper just to satify you especially since you will no doubt find some excuse to deny the truth no matter what. I will however post more links in hopes that a third person might be interested in reading about the Anti-Isaeli bias in many of Europe's Leftist journals.
For those who are not so hateful as to believe everything written by Jews is a lie I give you...
http://www.yashanet.com/anti-semitism/ A nice collection or recent anti-semetic articles from around the world. Yes, some from Europe too.
http://www.honestreporting.com/a/Archives.asp Honest reporting critiques newsreports from around the world pointing out errors, distortions, and outright lies. There are several examples from European papers concerning their treatment of Israel.
http://www.theblackflag.org/2003/la...aszlo030304.php A nice article on European anti-semitism and Pro-Arab bias.
http://www.jajz-ed.org.il/hasbara/h...tisemitism.html Sure these is a Jewish site but many of their points are no less valid. |
Oerdin, everything you post is from a lobby group with strong biases including honestreporting which is only concerned with correcting anti-Israeli distortions in the media. As I got reamed for posting a UNSC resolution simply because it was stored on electronicintifada, in another thread on the ME I have to call bullshit on everyone of your links. C'mon, stop being so lazy, it must be possible to find an article on European bias coming from a respected news source.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
gsmoove23
|
|
quote: When the Palestinian peoplr quit using terrorism to try to obtain their goals, then the world as a whole will hear their plight. Only then can they hope to address the problems that they face. |
This is flawed logic and it carries with it many inherent biases. First, you say that Pals must quit terror, then the world will hear their plight. The fact is that the world has heard their plight quite resoundingly. You talk of the current human condition and many people in the world see a causality, where the oppression, restriction of rights and misery of the Palestinians results in terror. So, in a sense terrorism has proven successful for the Palestinian. Certainly without it their problems would have never come to the fore of international debate, it would not have stayed in that position for so many years and the Palestinians would have been left largely to the whims of the Israeli government without international intervention or influence.
Only then can they hope to address the problems? I fail to see how they would have any hope of addressing their problems if Israel wasn't continuously kept on the front page. For the Palestinian their is a danger in stopping terrorism without assurances or concessions, as once terror is gone their is no reason for the rest of the world to believe there is a problem worth addressing.
I'm not arguing support for terrorism, only trying to flesh out your idea of the current human condition. By making the first move in any peace plan the end of terror, without goodwill or reasonable assurances (simply saying its in their best interest isn't an assurance) you are waiting on a pipe dream.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Ned
|
 |
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999 time: 21:28
|
|
quote: Originally posted by gsmoove23
This is flawed logic and it carries with it many inherent biases. First, you say that Pals must quit terror, then the world will hear their plight. The fact is that the world has heard their plight quite resoundingly. You talk of the current human condition and many people in the world see a causality, where the oppression, restriction of rights and misery of the Palestinians results in terror. So, in a sense terrorism has proven successful for the Palestinian. Certainly without it their problems would have never come to the fore of international debate, it would not have stayed in that position for so many years and the Palestinians would have been left largely to the whims of the Israeli government without international intervention or influence.
Only then can they hope to address the problems? I fail to see how they would have any hope of addressing their problems if Israel wasn't continuously kept on the front page. For the Palestinian their is a danger in stopping terrorism without assurances or concessions, as once terror is gone their is no reason for the rest of the world to believe there is a problem worth addressing.
I'm not arguing support for terrorism, only trying to flesh out your idea of the current human condition. By making the first move in any peace plan the end of terror, without goodwill or reasonable assurances (simply saying its in their best interest isn't an assurance) you are waiting on a pipe dream. |
gsmoove, there are ways of resistance to occupation that do not involve terrorism and that can get the attention of the world. I personally remember the resistance of the Buddhist monks to the Diem régime in South Vietnam. When those Buddhist monks set themselves on fire in public squares, TV sets across the world carried the tragic immolation. I am sure that when Gandhi was resisting British occupation of India, the whole world watched and admired his resistance. What I am suggesting is that the Palestinians can resist and gain the world's attention in ways that do not involve extreme violence against the Israelis.
Terrorism is not required for liberation.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:28. Apolyton Time is 00:28. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|