 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Urban Ranger
|
|
Apolyton Duke of Off-Topic
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Asher
Hey, they sure as hell can! Provided there are no rules about it.
That's a very bad analogy, UR. Why don't you think about it for a second.
1) Graphics cards are products. Athletes are competitors.
2) Much of these optimizations result in real-world performance boosts (ie, Q3A based games).
3) Athletes are competing in organizations that do have rules, and do restrict it. There are no such rules in video cards. |
There are no written rules. One of the idea behind benchmarks is they are fair, the playing field is even. Opimizations are a no-no because they break this basic idea.
That's why athletic competitions are such a good example. Sure, there are rules in those, but the rules are to enforce these fundamental ideas. These rules didn't exist before, they were put in place as more and more people started to cheat. This could very well be the case with things like benchmarks as well.
quote: Originally posted by Asher
Companies like their product to look their best. There's absolutely nothing wrong, illegal, or even immoral about optimizing/"cheating" in your drivers. It's your product, it's your drivers, you can do whatever the hell you want to them. |
It's not illegal per se, but it's immoral. It's like driving a race car that's been secretly modified to exceed the stated restrictions. You look good as long as you aren't exposed.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:28. Apolyton Time is 00:28. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|