 |
|  |
 |
|
Sir Ralph
|
 |
Long live teh Schwampel!
Dec 2001 time: 06:28
|
|
I'm nearly crying.
I wouldn't trust again somebody, who already stabbed a knife in my back, even if he promised not to do it again.
Vox on our continent is a big security risk, not because they could attack again, but because they hold a grudge against us and might allow the massive landing of Bobian civs on their territory without us being able to do anything against that.
Vox on another continent is a security risk, because they can and will deny us Nationalism.
Shiber, since Eli is your personal friend, I can understand your feelings, but I would expect you to abstain in this discussion. I don't accuse you to be illoyal or a Vox advocate, you are certainly not, but your (wanted or unwanted) bias is too obvious. I would abstain, if it came to discussions concerning a war against ND, even though I'm practically inactive in the ISDG.
Vox delenda est. Hispania delenda est. Nothing else.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
nbarclay
|
 |
Huntsville, Alabama
Dec 1999 time: 23:28
|
|
The really huge gain from the proposed deal is getting about a five-turn golden age head start, maybe even more, on the entire Courthouse, Aqueduct, Harbor, Library, Marketplace build chain. That alone should provide us with benefits exceeding the market price of Nationalism even if Vox breaks its promise to give it to us. And we could make it part of our agreement with Vox that should they violate their commitment to provide us with Nationalism, no NDA they sign with any other team will be considered valid. Further, consider the relative advantage if we get Nationalism for free while other teams have to pay for it.
By the way, I view personal relationships with people on other teams as something potentially useful as long as players are careful to put our team's needs and interests first. Diplomacy is easier when you have some insight into the personalities and attitudes of the people you are dealing with.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Shiber
|
 |
Haifa, Israel
Jul 2002 time: 07:28
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Sir Ralph
Well, whatever you say... Though it's a bit confusing, or should I say, Voxish? |
Whoa, crossed a line there buddy. I don't appreciate being compared to our obnoxious enemy.
I have a lot of things in common with Eli (we both major in the same subjects (computers and physics), we both applied for the same special programs in the military academic reserve etc'), but I don't think very highly of him.
quote: Who gives a damn? We had planned to kill them even before they attacked us, so now let's fulfill our destiny. |
I give a damn. I want to preserve those 10-15 medinfs and 5-10 pikes so we could use them against RP (we'll need everything that we can muster).
quote: Which is far from being sure |
As Nathan said, even if Vox won't keep their word (again) and won't deliver Nationalism, the value of using the rest of our GA for peaceful building equals or even exceeds that of Nationalism.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Sir Ralph
|
 |
Long live teh Schwampel!
Dec 2001 time: 06:28
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Shiber
Whoa, crossed a line there buddy. I don't appreciate being compared to our obnoxious enemy. |
I am nobody's "buddy". And the best way not to be compared with Vox is not to behave like Vox, i.e. to say today the opposite from what was valid yesterday. I don't give a damn about your relations with Eli, but at least you should decide whether you are his friend or not.
quote: I give a damn. I want to preserve those 10-15 medinfs and 5-10 pikes so we could use them against RP (we'll need everything that we can muster). |
Medieval infantries aren't very good for invasions, they are too slow and give the enemy too many time to maneuver. They also don't retreat and aren't upgradable, at least to nothing useful. They are a waste of upkeep money and the best to do with them is to let them bonk some Voxian head.
quote: As Nathan said, even if Vox won't keep their word (again) and won't deliver Nationalism, the value of using the rest of our GA for peaceful building equals or even exceeds that of Nationalism. |
I wouldn't sign this. Nationalism is worth at least 4 turns research, and probably even more, since it is twice as expensive as a late medieval advance and with less land (or with many, but corrupt land) we won't be able to research it in 4 turns. The threat not to acknowledge any NDA means absolutely nothing, because I suppose that the potential sellers will acknowledge it. They will do all what hurts us.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
nbarclay
|
 |
Huntsville, Alabama
Dec 1999 time: 23:28
|
|
Sir Ralph, I think there may be a language issue here. My impression is that there is a fairly wide range of views regarding how well people feel like they need to know someone before they consider the person a "friend" rather than just someone they know. I see nothing inconsistent about Shiber's enjoying chatting with Eli occasionally but not classifying him as a friend; it all depends on where Shiber draws that line in his own mind.
The real question is whether Shiber's acquanitanceship with Eli is close enough to compromise his objectivity to any serious degree. I see no evidence that it is.
Regarding the value of Medieval Infantry, slow-movers in general seem far more valuable in MP than in SP. For knights to have a significant maneuver advantage over MedInfs, they would have to approach without the protection of pikes. That's a whole lot safer in SP than it is in MP. And MedInfs can do fine for helping to defend cities by counterattacking units that attack the cities. All in all, the idea of viewing MedInfs as throwaway units that we would be just as well off without appalls me.
Regarding the relative value of building vs. Nationalism, keep in mind that we would be either buying Nationalism at a fraction of its research cost or researching it at a last-researcher price not much if any over half the first-researcher price. So what would take eight turns to research in an SP game where we're in first place would take no more than four here, all else being equal. (Not that all else will necessarily be quite equal, given the larger militaries needed in MP.) And if we're getting Chieftain research prices instead of Emperor research prices, that would also create a skew toward significantly faster research times than we're used to from SP.
Further, the economic benefit of building instead of fighting is something we get now, and thus something we can leverage for medieval warfare if we get in a fight before the industrial era. In contrast, ensuring that Vox can't shaft us on Nationalism becomes relevant significantly later in the game.
Regarding whether other civs would honor NDAs with Vox even though the NDAs themselves are a violation of Vox's treaty obligations with us, that's an interesting issue. After all, the other teams would have to worry about whether if they don't violate it, one of their neighbors will, in which case the other civ would be the one to profit from selling us the tech.
And finally, the benefits of being able to shift back to building sooner are definite, while the risk of being shafted on Nationalism is merely possible. The average expected outcome of letting Vox evacuate to another location must take into account both the possibility that Vox will betray us again and the possibility that they won't.
Edit: not only do knights lose their ability to be covered by pikes if they take full advantage of their speed, but they also lose their ability to be covered by catapults - and to have those catapults break down city walls (if any) before the knights start attacking.
Last edited by nbarclay on 07-06-2003 at 19:16
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Sir Ralph
|
 |
Long live teh Schwampel!
Dec 2001 time: 06:28
|
|
quote: Originally posted by nbarclay
Sir Ralph, I think there may be a language issue here. My impression is that there is a fairly wide range of views regarding how well people feel like they need to know someone before they consider the person a "friend" rather than just someone they know. I see nothing inconsistent about Shiber's enjoying chatting with Eli occasionally but not classifying him as a friend; it all depends on where Shiber draws that line in his own mind. |
I'm aware of the wide span of meanings of the word "friend". I consider myself a personal friend of some Apolyton posters, but not close enough to be their buddy, that may serve as example. However, the sentences "we're friends outside of the PTWDG" and "Eli is nowhere near my personal friend" contradict each other. With less good will I could even say, one of them is a lie. Hence my confusion.
What you say about the usefulness of medieval infantry may be valid, granted, and a lot also depends on terrain and how they are used. A medieval infantry plus a pikeman have the same stats as a knight and cost the same production-wise. But they cost double upkeep (which can sum up to dozens of gpt), do not retreat and move half as fast. Their only advantage over a knight is, that they need at least two attackers to be killed. The usage as extended city defenders, as you propose, is a good variant, but we don't need too many units for this purpose. At least it is not a reason to pay the upkeep for a large standing army of medieval infantry during the preparations. A small amount left over from the elimination of Vox will suffice. They are not the main assault units.
Re Nationalism: Even if we can research Nationalism cheaply, we still will lose at least 4 valuable turns in the race for the ToE.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Shiber
|
 |
Haifa, Israel
Jul 2002 time: 07:28
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Sir Ralph
I'm aware of the wide span of meanings of the word "friend". I consider myself a personal friend of some Apolyton posters, but not close enough to be their buddy, that may serve as example. However, the sentences "we're friends outside of the PTWDG" and "Eli is nowhere near my personal friend" contradict each other. With less good will I could even say, one of them is a lie. Hence my confusion. |
Will you drop it already?
Sir Ralph, I am not a close friend of Eli. We speak on ICQ, but mostly because we have many things in common in the academic aspect of life, not because we like each other. I am his friend, but not a close friend (or a "personal friend", in the words that I previously used - there's a language issue here. Transitions from Hebrew to English can be difficult, they are from two separate branches of human language, you have no idea how different the two languages are).
Anyway, I apologize if I wasn't clear enough (since I'm not a native English speaker, it is my duty to make sure that what I say is clear and unambiguous to a reasonable level). But I think that you owe me an apology as well, for implying that I might betray the team, which I regard as a harsh insult of (prep?) my character.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:28. Apolyton Time is 00:28. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|