 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Cruddy
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Oerdin
Haha, even the Guardian reports about how Mugabe beats and tortures members of the political opposition. So you don't condiers electrocuting people to the point of convulsions or even death to be torture? What about beating people to death or raping wives/daughters of men who oppose his rule? Or maybe you prefer illegal deportations (even after the supreme court has ruled them to be illegal) or imprisionment without trial and/or execution without trail? |
Don't put words in my mouth Oerdin. You may not like what I spit back at you.
And you seem to think that assassinating Mugabe would stop these terrible things happening.
Where's your guarantee it wouldn't make things worse?
I'm not saying do nothing - just assassination is an unsure way to ensue stability and a fairer system.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Cruddy
|
|
Here's another take on assassination; - if one is legit, all are legit seen from the perspective of the assassin.
So JFK, Martin Luther King, Abe Lincoln, even Jesus Christ were all fair targets.
Can you assume that position? I can't.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Q Cubed
|
 |
t3h y3ll0w p3ril
Apr 1999 time: 23:28
|
|
well, from the perspective of the assassin, not all are legit, i'd wager.
why? because a lot of said assassins kill because of political motivations. abe lincoln was assassinated by a southerner who didn't much like how the war ended up. mlk, by a southerner who didn't much like how the movement was ending up.
jesus wasn't killed by an assassin.
targets are legitimate to a particular assassin if and only if it makes sense within their world view-- which means i'd like to see if you can prove that john wilkes booth would have assassinated jefferson davis, or even considered him a legitimate target.
======
as for mugabe... he's a right nasty cvnt, but i don't think america has the capacity to rebuild such a country. if we did decide to take him out, we could no doubt defeat his military with a small force, but we'd need strong support from both local and world powers to set up a peacekeeping force.
else, it'll end up being like afghanistan, and iraq, if we screw up there too.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
CerberusIV
|
|
Mugabe signed up to the 1980 peace deal that ended white rule which was to last for ten years and stuck to it so Zimbabwe was pretty much a democracy for that time. Once the ten years of the agreement were up he set about changing the country into a one party state and the mess it is today.
As for South Africa, the USA/UK/EU countries are not prepared to upset the South Africans so whilst SA persists with seeking a negotiated solution to the Zimbabwe problem and continues to be the main source of food imports to Zimbabwe the rest of the world isn't going to do anything.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Arrian
|
 |
Kneel before Grog!
Jul 2001 time: 00:28
|
|
che,
I for one chose not to answer your question because, while I happen to agree that Mugabe probably doesn't crack the top 10 tinpot dictator list, I'm not overly fond of justifying inaction by pointing to other nasty fellows and saying "but what about them?"
Mugabe's actions have harmed non-whites in Zimbabwe worse than the whites. Black farm workers have apparently taken a terrible beating, and so has anyone connected to the MDC. Then add in the overall toll of the economic collapse, and there is quite a bit of non-white suffering going on in Zimbabwe. Many of the articles I've read mention this.
Having said all that, I do agree that the Zimbabwe situation gets more press than it would if there were no whites involved. That's unfortunate. Some of it, I think, stems from the linguistic/cultural connection the white farmers have with the US & UK audiences (they speak English, and in the case of Britain, they are the legacy of British colonialism). Therefore it is easier for us to experience their stories - to imagine what it would be like for us. Like I said, though, that covers "some of it."
I like that Gore Vidal quote, btw.
-Arrian
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Ecthy
|
|
Zhonghuà Rénmín Gònghéguó
Mar 2000 time: 06:28
|
|
what's the name of Liberia's despot, again?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ecthy
|
|
Zhonghuà Rénmín Gònghéguó
Mar 2000 time: 06:28
|
|
I supposed so, just wasn't sure.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ecthy
|
|
Zhonghuà Rénmín Gònghéguó
Mar 2000 time: 06:28
|
|
yes, 19th century... before that, great powerism was not an option
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:28. Apolyton Time is 00:28. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|