|
Cifer Almasy
|
 |
Detmold
Jan 2003
time: 05:28
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Gagliaudo
Cifer Almasy:
surely you're right saying Lyon was (and is) very important; as I wrote, Vichy could be chosen if scenario-creator wants emphatize the strictly-political side during the war: VICHY was the capitol city of the satellite-state of France (not occuped).
NOWADAYS Vichy could just be the mineral-water capitol city...  (after the italian ones, of course!!!  )
Other things are cities you wrote for example: Munchen, London and Washington surely was (and are) very important political centre, not so Longview, Southampton and Nurnberg (but its trial at the end...). More, Munchen was the starting-centre of the Nazi party in 30's (but Nurnberg was one of the most important cities for this party, too).
Well, right, I always speak too much... 
Valuk:
D'Annunzio 'fascist' ?....
Maybe. Maybe later. Probably.
The only sure thing is that D'Annunzio was... D'ANNUNZIAN !!!!!  |
I know what you mean
But I still think that the economicly more important city must be chosen. You could give an event to Lyon - if taken - that says that Vichy also has fallen.
I see that Vichy has its importance but imho it cant replace Lyon what is much much much more important. Cause in Civ2 the economy is simulated - not the political worth of a city.
|
17-06-2003 22:24
|
|