 |
|  |
 |
|
Defiant
|
 |
WISCONSIN
Aug 1999 time: 05:28
|
|
I have found no "actual evidence" we ever gave WMD or intelligence to producde WMD to Iraq and I defy anybody to find the evidence. But, I also believe we did give them the ability to create bio/chem to fight Iran, leveling the playing field if you will. I don't agree with it, but I am sure we saw Iraq the lesser of two evils at that time, but down the road we seem to always fight the weapons we sell. It is one thing to give the intelligence to produce the weapons, it is another thing for that country to use them as Iraq did against its own citizens.
If you want to hold the past US Presidents responsible for arming Iraq with WMD, then shouldn't we hold France, Russia, North Korea for selling intelligence that allows countries like Iran and Iraq to have and build weapons grade nuclear facilities???????
See Sava, this is the major league in politics and either you are one of the heavy hitters like Bush and rule the game or you are a bat boy in the farm league like yourself. The best thing you can do is stay our of their way, your life will be better off.
Last edited by Defiant on 18-06-2003 at 00:30
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Q Cubed
|
 |
t3h y3ll0w p3ril
Apr 1999 time: 23:28
|
|
quote: If you want to hold the past US Presidents responsible for arming Iraq with WMD, then shouldn't we hold France, Russia, North Korea for selling intelligence that allows countries like Iran and Iraq to have and build weapons grade nuclear facilities??????? |
defiant, what about our other "allies"?
france's nuclear secrets came from the us.
north korea's came from pakistan, south korea, japan, and the us (although the latter three only taught them how to build non-weapons capable reactors).
afghanistan's mujahideen warriors were funded by america to fight those damned pesky soviets.
iran fell under the sway of islamic fundamentalists because we supported the shah, became increasingly autocratic and began turning the people against him.
quote: See Sava, this is the major league in politics and either you are one of the heavy hitters like Bush and rule the game or you are a bat boy in the farm league like yourself. The best thing you can do is stay our of their way, your life will be better off. |
why is he in the farm leagues? because he disagrees with your/bush's opinions?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Sava
|
 |
GO GO GO!
Mar 2001 time: 23:28
|
|
quote: I have found no "actual evidence" we ever gave WMD or intelligence to producde WMD to Iraq and I defy anybody to find the evidence. | Here you go then Defiant... educate yourself so you can "play in the major leagues".
http://www.casi.org.uk/info/usdocs/usiraq80s90s.html
This is a website that has detailed the US and Iraq relationship in the 80's and 90's. They provide sources such as: Official US Documents, The Washington Post, The New York Times, The Financial Times, The Associated Press, The New Yorker, and several independent authors.
quote:
If you want to hold the past US Presidents responsible for arming Iraq with WMD, then shouldn't we hold France, Russia, North Korea for selling intelligence that allows countries like Iran and Iraq to have and build weapons grade nuclear facilities??????? | Let's clean up our own house first.
quote:
See Sava, this is the major league in politics and either you are one of the heavy hitters like Bush and rule the game or you are a bat boy in the farm league like yourself. The best thing you can do is stay our of their way, your life will be better off. | Sorry, your condescending threats won't convince me. This is America, although our Democracy has been hijacked, I still believe that our country will progress until true representative equality is achieved. Nobody will shut me up, and I will continue to attack the enemies of Democracy, Freedom, and Peace. This bridges all political lines. Conservatives were lied to as well. The smart ones are starting to see this. The media is starting to see this. And although they are strangely silent, they no longer give unwavering support to this president.
If you want to play more games and learn about history, Defiant, I'll create a thread about the history of the Bush family, and how they made their money from the Nazis.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
The Templar
|
 |
People's Republic of the East Village
Oct 2001 time: 00:28
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Berzerker
Boris -
The media is liberal and a century of pushing big government solutions to "our" problems shows that. |
Right. Liberals like Hume, Cavuto, Hannity, and O'Reilly on Fox, Dobbs and Novack on CNN, Scarborough and Mathews on MSNBC, Rush on the radio, Kristol, Goldberg, and Buckley in print and online. Ann Coulter on every damn talk show.
Yeah, all those big gubbament liberals out to cheat the good decent Chrstian folks in the business world. Like the guys at Enron.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Berzerker
|
 |
topeka, kansas,USA
May 1999 time: 23:28
|
|
quote: Well some of us who still think the media has a duty to perform a public service by keeping the citizenry informed |
Hehe, when did you start thinking that? Look at the press 210 years ago when Adams and Jefferson were forming the first 2 parties.
Templar - quote: Right. Liberals like Hume, Cavuto, Hannity, and O'Reilly on Fox, Dobbs and Novack on CNN, Scarborough and Mathews on MSNBC, Rush on the radio, Kristol, Goldberg, and Buckley in print and online. Ann Coulter on every damn talk show.
Yeah, all those big gubbament liberals out to cheat the good decent Chrstian folks in the business world. Like the guys at Enron. |
And even most of the "conservatives" you've cited support big government, they just don't agree with you all the time about which freedoms to remove. Citing a radio entertainer, book author, and an assortment of people from financial guys along with a few Republicans doesn't mean the media hasn't been liberal for decades. And Mathews? He worked for Tip O'Neill for god's sake.
Here's a simple test: how big was the federal government 200 years ago? How big was it 100 years ago? And now? See a trend? And has the media been fighting against this growth in government? On select issues, like preserving freedom of the press/speech. Whoopie!!! But when it comes to "solving problems", even local or state, the media is constantly on the side of federalising the problems. Government grew alot under Reagan, was the media criticising him for allowing the increase? Of course not, he was constantly criticised for not growing government enough. Slowing the increase in a program's budget became a budget cut, etc... If the media ain't liberal enough for a quasi-socialist, that doesn't mean it isn't liberal.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:28. Apolyton Time is 00:28. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|