 |
|
MRT144
|
|
Seattle Washington
Oct 2002 time: 21:29
|
|
i wait for uberkrux's opinion
|
|
|  |
 |
|
DanielXY
|
|
Germany
Dec 2002 time: 05:29
|
|
except for the military, for what else do you need non-fat ppl. to keep your dominance? I guess 40% are sufficient
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Cruddy
|
|
I would put the tax on the sugar companies rather than the fat people.
After all, the sugar companies are the one who profit from obesity.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Cruddy
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Boddington's
But it's the fat people and their decisions who cost society, not the companies that feed their demand. |
That's like saying pushing heroin is OK, and it's the end users that cause the problems.
Sure, the sugar companies will pass on the tax hit to the consumer - and that will reduce the amount of obesity while generating tax revenue to deal with the health risks.
It's a solution, rather than penalizing the addict and letting the supplier get away with making people dependant.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:29. Apolyton Time is 00:29. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|