25-06-2003 23:09									#1
	Question on the Continents Support Apolyton, buy Alpha Centauri

I don't really understand why there are 7 continents and not more, or even less.

Australia and Antartica I understand, but why all the other divisions?

North and South America are divided by an isthmus, as well as Africa and Asia... so, I guess that makes sense. Yet why Europe and Asia? The Urals? Constituting a division in continental plates? If that were the case we should have many continents and not just 7. Also, if Iceland, Finland, Norway, and Sweden on the same "continental plate" as the rest of Europe?

Basically, why determines these continents? Was it based on someones interpretation of the world, plate tectonics, or political agendas?

	25-06-2003 23:16									#2
	Support Apolyton, buy Civilization III: Complete

Mostly on cultural differences and politics rather than actual geophysics.

Most of them got named before plate tectonics theory evolved...

If you use the latter, don't you need 2 continents in the Caribbean for the local plate differences? Could well be wrong here - long time since I studied geology.

	25-06-2003 23:17									#3
	Support Apolyton, buy Call to Power 2

the division between europe and asia was most likely a political and interpretated division.

	25-06-2003 23:25									#4
	Increase Your PM Length

I would expect Oerdin to know...

Anyway, I assume it is all based on politics. I have seen the Russian being in Asia/Europe discussion a lot, and from the looks it is about half and half, which kind of throws the politics thing out the window unless the labeling was accomplished prior to Russia or by some non-Russian...

Plates: the Eurasian plate, Australian-Indian plate, Philippine plate, Pacific plate, Juan de Fuca plate, Nazca plate, Cocos plate, North American plate, Caribbean plate, South American plate, African plate, Arabian plate, the Antarctic plate, and the Scotia plate. These plates consist of smaller sub-plates.

14 major plates. The Eurasian plate is not even responsible for the Urals.

	25-06-2003 23:32									#5
	Support Apolyton, buy Alpha Centauri

Many now refer to "Eurasia" as a single geographic entity, while "Europe" and "Asia" are made distinct for political/historical purposes.

	26-06-2003 00:01									#6
	Support Apolyton, buy Civilization 2

How about because Eurasia is a hell of a bigass chunk of land, and it's much easier to think about two smaller ones?

	26-06-2003 00:05									#7
	Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

though the odd thing about the Europe/Asia and the Asia/Africa division is when it comes to the middle east... one side of the Dardenelles is european and the other is asian... or one side of the Sinai is african and the other asian... even though there is not a single bit of difference between the people on either side

	26-06-2003 00:18									#8
	Support Apolyton or Terrorists Win

when it was all decided europe = christendom, asia = filthy heathens. easy.

	26-06-2003 00:23									#9
	Support Apolyton, pre-order Civilization IV

there were filthy heathens living this side of the Urals and still are

	26-06-2003 00:27									#10
	Support Apolyton or Terrorists Win

Europe snobbery over thinking Asians were below us. Eurasia is the continent.

	26-06-2003 00:28									#11
	Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

yeah, but Russians and Poles are Europeans / filthy heathens that are below us, too.

	26-06-2003 00:32									#12
	Support Apolyton, buy GURPS/ Alpha Centauri

yeah but they were under the 'protection' of good christians

	26-06-2003 00:33									#13
	Browse Apolyton AD-FREE

grr, damn cross posts

	26-06-2003 00:36									#14
	Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations

So North America is all the land that the whiteman successfully stole, and South America is all the land that the heathens still control...I get it

And Poland and Russia are actually parts of Asia, and if I so desired I could put France there now too...

	26-06-2003 00:38									#15
	Remove this text

nah, coz then Germany would be an island.

of rock. fear us.

	26-06-2003 00:42									#16
	Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations

quote: Originally posted by Japher So North America is all the land that the whiteman successfully stole, and South America is all the land that the heathens still control...I get it

Didn't "the white man" successfully steal a good deal of South America as well...?

	26-06-2003 00:43									#17
	Inflate your Upload Space

I don't consider Spainards white, but ok, since I wouldn't put them in Africa or Asia...

	26-06-2003 00:45									#18
	Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations

I always thought Spaniards were some mix of Africans and Asians. That's why all of them look so funny.

	26-06-2003 00:50									#20
	Support Apolyton, buy Call to Power 2

spanish people are white, mexicans though are mostly mixed white and amerindian.

	26-06-2003 00:50									#21
	Increase Your PM Length

North and South America might be joined by an Ithsmus, but that is a very new landbridge, only about 4 million years old. The cosystems of the two continents were separate fo most of thier development and are still strikingly different. Africa, due to its thin connection to Eurasia also has very different ecosystems.

I think the separation of Europe from Asia is geographically speaking the artificial one, since the Eurals arn't that much of a barrier, no worse that the Mountains in Iran, or far less of a division that the Himalayas.

	26-06-2003 00:52									#22
	Get a bigger avatar today!

Spanish people are whiter than Mexicans? bollocks, the Indian influence in American population is almost zero.

	26-06-2003 00:55									#23
	Support Apolyton

yes they are, i think it's 95% of the mexican population are of mixed spanish and amerindian blood.

	26-06-2003 00:56									#24
	Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition

but how? I'd never have thought it's so much, amerindians being wiped out and all... oh well.

	26-06-2003 01:05									#25
	Support Apolyton, buy Call to Power 2

you're thinking about the area where the united states is today. the colonial system in mexico led to the mixing of the populations, it was a bit like the feudal system. i can't really be arsed to explain it (going to bed soon, read a book on it etc.) but suffice to say that it wasn't a case of all the natives being wiped out and 100 million spanish moving in.

	26-06-2003 01:21									#26
	Increase Your PM Length

quote: Also, if Iceland, Finland, Norway, and Sweden on the same "continental plate" as the rest of Europe?

Iceland lies on the Mid-Atlantic rift, the eastern part is on the Euro plate and the Western part on the American one. The two parts separate at 2 cm's per year, making for a fascinating landscape.

	26-06-2003 01:31									#27
	Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

The two parts separate at 2 cm's per year, making for a fascinating landscape.

You are more patient, by far, than me....

-=Vel=-

	26-06-2003 02:38									#28
	Inflate your Upload Space

I suppose separating Asia and Europe was based on the 2 population centers - Europe and China - with the vast steppes in between. I'd call Europe and Asia one continent and promote Greenland to continent status so we still have 7. Btw, 7 is a sacred number and the Earth is the 7th planet from the abyss of space.

	26-06-2003 04:31									#29
	Support Apolyton

Hueij: Iceland, one of my Top 10 places I want to visit

Another interesting place would be Seychelles in the Indian Ocean. The granite that makes up the islands dates from the Gondwana supercontinent. The islands broke off from the Indian plate as it drifted northeast after seperating from Africa/Madagascar/Australia. Absolutely beautiful landscape.

	26-06-2003 05:04									#30
	Suffering from ads?

People are so ignorant of Geopgraphy in the US, a person asked me what Eurasia was.