 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Asher
|
 |
Calgary, Alberta
Nov 1999 time: 22:28
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Cloud9
Asher:
First of all, I don't see any consistencies in your arguments. I'll explain later. |
There are absolutely no inconsistencies in my arguments, people can even predict what I'll say. 
quote: Second of all, explain to me why the government would deliberately do something to slow down the P4s? |
It's not the government doing the testing, it's some guy who happens to work for NASA because he plays with their Jet3D software
And for whatever reason, they chose a shitty compiler when Intel's Fortran compiler is widely known to be the fastest. Hell, you know your compiler sucks ass when you enable the highest level of optimizations and enable SSE/SSE2 and it slows down.
It's obviously not a general comparison test, it's a test for their specific Jet3D environment to compare what they have available and what would work.
For whatever reason, NASA had licensed Portland Group's compiler, so they used that. That's also why they used what they had on hand, 2GHz and 2.66GHz P4s rather than the new ones.
And even so, with the crap compiler & settings and outdated P4 chips, the P4 is still quite a bit faster.
"Fastest personal computer in the world!" Steve Jobs rules.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:28. Apolyton Time is 00:28. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|