 |
|
Berzerker
|
 |
topeka, kansas,USA
May 1999 time: 23:29
|
|
quote: If people aren't willing to defend the nation, why should the nation exist?
Further, the two times the US has been invaded, there have been plenty of volunteers (Revolution, War of 1812). |
Yup, is a country really worth fighting for if people won't even volunteer? Nope. When we have been invaded, people did volunteer.
quote: I don't count the Civil War, which was really caused by the US anyway. |
Interesting how both sides used a draft to wage that war, huh?
Kind of exposes the nature of drafts...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:29
|
|
quote: Whether you like it or not... the constitution does allow the government to pass laws. And while the government would never pass a law saying you have to wear a pink tutu... it can pass laws that say you must pay taxes or can be conscripted. |
Certainly the Constitution allows Congress to pass laws, but even Imran will agree that the Constitution doesn't allow the government to pass *any* law.
quote: Yes... and the current laws have been deemed ok according to the constitution... your point? |
Various laws throughout US history have been deemed OK by SCOTUS, when clearly they are wrong.
quote: And as far as moral goes... again, only YOUR opinion, so that doesn't make it a fact... just your opinion. |
Are you a moral relativist, or do you believe in certain absolutes? Serious question.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:29
|
|
quote: Interesting how both sides used a draft to wage that war, huh?
Kind of exposes the nature of drafts... |
Yes, and I'll also point out that just because I say the US was at fault in causing the Civil War doesn't mean I think the CSA was behaving very morally, either.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:29
|
|
quote: I believe in certain absolutes when it comes to morality... |
Excellent, I agree. What absolutes do you believe in?
quote: And yes, I don't feel that ANY law can be passed |
Excellent. Presumably, you agree that Congress can't pass a law that is against the Constitution.
Let me ask you this, then. Can a law be unconstitutional, even if SCOTUS says it isn't? Take an extreme example - if Congress passes a law banning the Muslim religion, and SCOTUS allows it, is it really Constitutional?
quote: But laws that have been passed and are considered constitutional at the time are the law, and must be followed, |
What about laws that violate a moral absolute, which you have agreed exist?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:29
|
|
quote: Uhhh... you can't refute personal opinions. I feel it isn't immoral. I give my reasons... and he gave his. He thinks he's right... I think I'm right. again... just opinion, and not facts. |
And it'll remain as such until we find out what you believe are moral absolutes.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:29
|
|
quote: First... this thread is about conscription... |
It's about the morality of conscription.
quote: And the Country has had it in the past... and it was deemed constitutional... |
The original case here is Arver v US. This decision was pretty much made in an era of war fervor, that was made even more evident by a case called Schenk v US. Basically, SCOTUS upheld a number of laws preventing the criticism of war, criticising Conscription, even criticising the government, and rejected a challenge to conscription. Anyone who points to these decisions and claims they are a result of ANYTHING other than nationalism/patriotism and war fervor are basically wrong.
quote: But as far as absolutes... murder (and I don't consider self defense murder) rape... slavery (and I don't consider conscription slavery)... racism... just a few off the top of my head. |
OK, those are absolutes, and I agree that these are always wrong. Now, WHY are they always wrong? What do they all have in common?
The common denominators are individual liberty, and the right to life, wouldn't you agree?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:29
|
|
quote: I would have taken the risk to die for somebody else's security. I have no problem with the youth of today taking the same risk I would have. |
If this is true, why didn't you volunteer?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:29
|
|
quote: Yep... but the difference is, I don't see it as a loss of personal freedom. I see it as a contract between country and citizen. |
And you still haven't justified the existence of such a contract. It certainly didn't exist at the beginning, so where did it come from? Did the government just make it up?
Furthermore, saying that being forced to join the military isn't a loss of personal freedom is ridiculous. It ignores the definition of several words, most notably "force" and "freedom".
|
|
|  |
 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:29
|
|
quote: I took my chance by being in the lottery... I signed up, and didn't get called. I was lucky. And that's the way it was back then. I lived up to my contract with the US government. |
Sure, but if you were so willing to go fight, then you should have volunteered and taken the place of someone not so willing.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:29
|
|
By the way, if anyone thinks that Daniel Webster is an authority on the Constitution, check out this link:
http://www.antiwar.com/paul/paul32.html
Regardless of the URL, it's an actual speech by Webster posted in its entirety, not some analysis of Webster's unstated thoughts.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:29. Apolyton Time is 00:29. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|