 |
|  |
 |
|
Albert Speer
|
|
Puerile Polemic
Mar 1999 time: 00:29
|
|
i knew a thread entitled "Damn taxes..." would attract David before long...
although to make **** clear as i see that he just said he agrees with me on the tax issue... i am not against taxes, David... i am against wasted tax dollars (which aside from the bureaucratic mess and all that does include as far as i'm concerned things like foreign aid and welfare checks [in many cases, though i do see there should be a welfare to work system]) and i am also against the lower middle class bearing the burden of gov't spending... always bothered me... it's like the only thing worse than being poor is being lower middle class cause you live just like poor people and never get any of the benefits of being poor like welfare and all that... and just to top it all off, you got to pay for that ****.
so, David, there should be taxes just lower middle class people can't be the burden bearers when it comes to gov't spending.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
MichaeltheGreat
|
|
Apolyton Grand Executioner
|
 |
mooning the house that Ruth built.
Oct 1999 time: 21:29
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Albert Speer
so you got to pay Mexican taxes too, mtg? |
If I buy stuff here, I have to pay IVA (value added tax, the local version of sales tax), but that's it, other than property taxes. LTEC! in theory has the opposite problem I do, so our tax situation is weird, as we're tax homed in different countries. Same thing if I have a business "here" here, as opposed to in the US but able to work in/on it from here. If I had a real business presence here (registered, etc.) then I'd be subject to Mexican taxes for that, and possibly US taxes for dividends, depending on the type of Mexican business organization.
Some multinational stuff lets you play games and skate for free, but mostly what you get into here, is picking which tax jurisdiction is less a pain in the ass, which generally means the US wins hands down.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Albert Speer
|
|
Puerile Polemic
Mar 1999 time: 00:29
|
|
a debate here would be a mess... me saying that only the rich should be paying taxes but also that social welfare programs should be shrunk... you saying there should be no taxes period and no social programs... leftists saying rich people should be taxed like i don't know what and social programs be expanded... and thats not even bringing in any conservatives or moderates into it.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jack_www
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Albert Speer
what republicans are saying the poor don't pay taxes? i dont see how anyone could say this nor what the political point would be to say this... aint it better for the anti-tax republicans to say that they are going to take off the burden of taxes for the poor?
although poor might mean unemployed and welfare mothers and what not... anyone with a job i consider lower middle class. |
I think what republicans say is that the poor dont pay federal income tax, just payroll taxes for unemployment and social security, ect.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Albert Speer
|
|
Puerile Polemic
Mar 1999 time: 00:29
|
|
MtG:
he's a texan... they got that whole attitude of do **** quick and dirty and never think of the future... you know how it is.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
DanielXY
|
|
Germany
Dec 2002 time: 05:29
|
|
With all this anti-welfare thing going on:
I always wondered what you are supposed to live off, when you just lost your job, got no savings, noone is hiring you atm no matter how hard you try, and there is no welfare to help you out for a few month?
I mean the only rational option left (besides living from garbage) is go and steal the money.
I agree welfare should be very low living standard (enough for cheap housing and food, thats it). But essentiell giving people with tough luck no other realistic option than to go for the crime route doesnt seem like such great a concept...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jack_www
|
|
Albert Speer:
I too hate how the government wastes tax payer money. I think a lot of it has to due with the fact that when people are spending other people's money they are not as carefull with it. Also many congress people use "pork barrel" spending to effectivily buy votes in their home districts and the hunderds of lobblyist that want a piece of government money in exechange for support come election time creates a lot of waste.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:29
|
|
quote: I always wondered what you are supposed to live off, when you just lost your job, got no savings, noone is hiring you atm no matter how hard you try, and there is no welfare to help you out for a few month? |
None of this justifies forcing others to help you. Even if you will starve to death, that is not enough justification to force people to give you money.
quote: I mean the only rational option left (besides living from garbage) is go and steal the money. |
This is utterly wrong. There could be family members to fall back on, or friends. Churches will always help you out, as will (in the US) places like the YMCA/YWCA, Salvation Army, Red Cross, etc.
And sure, there is probably a case where someone is completely out of luck on all of that stuff. But that's life. Life's a *****, and then you die - but some die sooner than others. That doesn't excuse stealing, though.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jack_www
|
|
quote: Originally posted by DanielXY
With all this anti-welfare thing going on:
I always wondered what you are supposed to live off, when you just lost your job, got no savings, noone is hiring you atm no matter how hard you try, and there is no welfare to help you out for a few month?
I mean the only rational option left (besides living from garbage) is go and steal the money.
I agree welfare should be very low living standard (enough for cheap housing and food, thats it). But essentiell giving people with tough luck no other realistic option than to go for the crime route doesnt seem like such great a concept... |
Well their are problems to this. This creates a dependency on the government. People will rather live off wellfare and not work. Personaly I would try and help someone that I knew hit hard times and such. BUt in US were having massive buget problems in allmost all the states and federal government. So its kind of hard to help people with welfare when you have no money.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Albert Speer
|
|
Puerile Polemic
Mar 1999 time: 00:29
|
|
Daniel:
companies are usually forced to give warnings before lay-offs so workers can prepare a little bit... there's also unemployment benefits and all that...
trust me, it aint as bad as you made it out to be. i know people or people's pops who been unemployed for weeks and they still didnt get no welfare
|
|
|  |
 |
|
DanielXY
|
|
Germany
Dec 2002 time: 05:29
|
|
Yes I know its not that hard in most cases. Usually you can get a friend or relative to help you. Or some org. like churches or whatever. But there are still some cases left where there is not much of a choiche...
Hm, how much is the US spending on welfare each year? And how much is that in % from the whole budget?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jack_www
|
|
I think most of welfare cost comes in the from of medicare programs for poor people. Just in the state of California we spend billions on it, especially with all the legal and illegal immigrants from Mexico coming into the state. I am sure the one of the federal governments highest expence is heathcare.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Albert Speer
|
|
Puerile Polemic
Mar 1999 time: 00:29
|
|
Daniel:
trust me... it's not as bad as you're thinking. you'd be surprised how even in a place like the city where people don't have that strong of a community, you can still count on people... and you can rummage (or hustle) some money together for food and what not. and that aint even mentioning unemployment benefits, savings, charities, etc.
quote: We no longer have people living off welfare for a decade or more nor do we have women deliberately getting pragnant just so they can get more welfare. Beleive it or not prior to the mid 1990's this was a problem especially in the black community. |
what the hell kind of bullshit is this?!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Albert Speer
|
|
Puerile Polemic
Mar 1999 time: 00:29
|
|
oh and also, Daniel... a considerable majority of americans are suspicious of welfare. i dont think you can get a majority of americans to ever support european style welfare systems... so thats the other thing to keep in mind... popular opinion.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Albert Speer
|
|
Puerile Polemic
Mar 1999 time: 00:29
|
|
wasnt that proven to just be a myth though... i was too young to know about this back then but i can't imagine anyone just pumping out kids to collect more money... i know women probably were on welfare and were kind of loose and got pregnant but not for the intent to collect more.
(and what does collecting more mean? they got to pay for another mouth)
|
|
|  |
 |
|
OliverFA
|
|
Leeds, UK
Sep 2002 time: 06:29
|
|
We can discuss which is the proper amount of taxes, but discussing the taxes themselves is completely nonsense.
As has already been pointed, taxes are used for all this things that are needed but noone would do because it is too expensive for them or because their benefits are difficult to be seen if you don't pay much attention. Just think how would life be without a government to protect your freedom.
But I agree that taxes should be as low as posible (without compromising the state basic functions of course!), because for most things the use that the individuals do of the money is much efficient that the use that the states does.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
DanielXY
|
|
Germany
Dec 2002 time: 05:29
|
|
quote: i dont think you can get a majority of americans to ever support european style welfare systems... |
Yes, welfare in europe esspecially Germany is way to big. ATM I would be better of living from welfare than I do now from my (trainee) job. And I life rather comfortable. (I get 550,-/m, on welfare I would get rent + 300,- + money for clothes, + money for special stuff like furniture/tv, etc. when I dont have them).
IMHO the ideal welfare system would be like: Free housing in homes. Those homes could be like german style prisons without all the security stuff (Thats not as bad as it sounds, they are rather comfortable: 15qm for 2 persons, 2 beds, a desk with chair, toilet.). You get 100,-/m for food and everything else you want to buy (you can eat from 30,- a month without malenutrition, if you want to eat good healthy stuff 60,- is reasonable). Thats it. The incenitiv to look for job and get out of those homes would be big I supose.
I believe such a system is cheaper than none. Cose in that case crime would go up and you would have to put those poor fellas in real prisons which is much more expensive, not to speak of increasing costs for police and courts....
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:29. Apolyton Time is 00:29. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|