 |
|
Albert Speer
|
|
Puerile Polemic
Mar 1999 time: 00:29
|
|
I bought Call to Power II a few days ago and one thing that i thought was strange was how instead of outer space being the future of human expansion, in CtP, you're supposed to colonize the ocean...
now would that ever be real practical? are there enough resources down there to off-set the huge costs of underwater construction of tunnels and all that?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Eli
|
|
Israel
Jul 2000 time: 07:29
|
|
Floating "cities" are feasible.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
mrmitchell
|
|
Remember, the cost of new technology is always outrageous.
(If we can avoid ecological issues, sea colonisation will happen sometime...probably the same time or a little after space.)
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Proteus_MST
|
|
It could begin on a small scale,
small habitates where worker live which mine ressources from the Bottom of the Ocean.
But if there will be ever Cities on a large Scale?
Maybe more in form of those floating Cities already mentioned.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
mrmitchell
|
|
you mean "Sealab 2020"?
redone as "Sealab 2021" for Adult Swim.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
DRoseDARs

|
 |
"My god, it's full of peas..."
Jul 2002 time: 21:29
|
|
Somewhat On-Topic:
SeaQuest DSV was a great scifi show. The technologies weren't absurdly advanced like Star Trek, but it still felt futuristic. But when they changed the format with a more militaristic tone, they killed it. Scifi never does well in regular TV because most people think "If I don't understand Science, then I won't like scifi shows." B*llsh*t. I nearly pass out at the sight of open surgery, but I still enjoy E.R. I'm disgusted with Washington politics, but I still enjoy The West Wing. I find the genre of Medival-anything boring, but I still enjoy Samurai Jack. I absolutely hate reality TV, but I still watch The Osbornes from time to time.
Specifically On-Topic:
Underwater habitations are no more unlikely than any in space. Our current technologies (in processes and materials) are already at a place where we could start rudimentary settlements in both environments. Problem is the cost and peoples' willingness to brave the dangers inherent in colonizing new frontiers. Implossions, seaquakes, collisions are all real dangers...but not insurmountable. Finding financial backing for construction is all but impossible for the time being.
There are vast mineral riches to be found in the deep sea, but we have to be willing to get to them first. Mining is probably better left to automated mining operations, but opening the sea to inhabited settlements will help eliviate a great deal of population stresses in many countries. All the same can pretty much be said of space colonization.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
MichaeltheGreat
|
|
Apolyton Grand Executioner
|
 |
mooning the house that Ruth built.
Oct 1999 time: 21:29
|
|
quote: Originally posted by DRoseDARs
I doubt settling the *Edit: let me doublecheck that name...* would be a very smart idea, but certainly the pressure on continental shelf is managable.
I fully support automation for the deepest depths, but for the shallows there's a place for people. |
The shallows (relative term here) give you a different set of structural design issues, with surge, temperature gradients, storm effects, etc. Then there's a problem with anchoring structures on uneven, non-compactible base material, dewatering, condensation, etc. Then you get the wondrous corrosive effects of sea water, (it'll kill any grade of stainless steel), and even at shallow depths, pressure is not trivial - you add one atmosphere of pressure for every ten meters of depth.
Breathing is a problem, unless you stick to atmospheric air pressure (a problem in the structural design), or gas mixtures (expensive to support).
|
|
|  |
 |
|
TCO
|
 |
Richmond, VA
Jan 1970 time: 00:29
|
|
quote: Originally posted by MichaeltheGreat
The shallows (relative term here) give you a different set of structural design issues, with surge, temperature gradients, storm effects, etc. Then there's a problem with anchoring structures on uneven, non-compactible base material, dewatering, condensation, etc. Then you get the wondrous corrosive effects of sea water, (it'll kill any grade of stainless steel), and even at shallow depths, pressure is not trivial - you add one atmosphere of pressure for every ten meters of depth.
Breathing is a problem, unless you stick to atmospheric air pressure (a problem in the structural design), or gas mixtures (expensive to support). |
I like the ocean. 
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Cruddy
|
|
Albert, there is a certain amount of mineral wealth in the oceans - but one thing space has that the ocean hasn't is sunlight.
A lot easier to power a spacecraft than a deep sea ocean habitat.
I guess space and sea will happen at a similar rate - we'll need those minerals and will work out ways to get them - but whole communities underwater? Doubtful when you could build them floating on top with less grief.
OK, you get weather on the top - and you get earthquakes on the bottom. No easy answers sometimes.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:29. Apolyton Time is 00:29. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|