 |
|  |
 |
|
Firelad
|
|
Haifa, Israel.
May 2002 time: 07:29
|
|
Kung Fu! Just find a decent teacher, bloody difficult to find. Although it might be boring to learn to do 3 punches and two kicks for a year and then start doing a form or something. But you should see what a talented KF fighter can do... I've got a friend and let's just say that you don't want to mess with him (not to speak of his older brother) even though he's 16.
And our teacher isn't that traditional either. More's the pity - traditional teachers have a much lesser tendency to "bloat" it like someone here mentioned - they focus on studying very slowly, a few techniques and learn them good.
David - street fights had better not end on the floor... There's a reason why traditional martial arts don't focus on ground fighting - I remember what happend the first and last time I took somebody down to the floor in a real fight and I know what to do on the floor(I've handled people almost twice as big as me on the mat).
Let's just say that I was lucky that I can take a beating and that help arrived. It's not fun to be a focus of five guys holding you and kicking at you while another is sitting on you. It went pretty good for me (except that I almost earned myself a good time in prison...) till I made the foolish decision to go on the floor.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:29
|
|
Firelad,
Yes, most fights will certainly go to the ground. Not all, but most. As for going to the ground against 5 guys, well, in a standup fight you are just as screwed, so that's a faulty scenario.
You do NOT want to be flat on your back on asphalt, which is why I don't really recommend any type of grappling style that involves wearing a uniform (or any martial art, for that matter). That's why I take Valetudo. It incorporates a lot of elements of jiujitsu, but it is more street realistic - it teaches alternate forms of the guard, and it teaches you to put your thumbs in people's eyes and pull outward, among other things.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:29
|
|
I have to disagree WRT Tai Chi being a powerful fighting system. It might be a great ART, and it certainly is difficult to do well and very nice looking when it is done well, but it is certainly not a dedicated fighting system, in the way that Muay Thai is, or Valetudo is.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:29
|
|
quote: Would you say aikido is a powerful fighting system, even though it too is completely defensive? |
Not really.
I do have an observation, though. In no holds barred fighting competitions, I have seen straight kung fu style fighters compete a total of twice. The first guy lost badly to Royce Gracie, a Brazilian Jiujitsu stylist, and the second guy lost even worse to Dave Beneteau, a wrestler/ground-and-pound specialist. This leads me to believe that styles such as these are, on the whole, more effective in terms of realistic fighting than kung fu systems.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970 time: 05:29
|
|
Let me expand on my "not really" comment, WRT to Aikido being a powerful art. The problem with a defensive style is that it depends on reactions to the opponent - it requires that you are able to anticipate and counter any move your opponent can make, and it assumes that you aren't going to get hit. This is inherently less powerful than a system that teaches you to go straight after an opponent with punches, leg kicks, and take downs, get him on the ground, and pound on his face. Or, even worse, put your thumbs into both of his eyes, hard. Or, stand up and stomp on his face.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:29. Apolyton Time is 00:29. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|