 |
|
yavoon
|
|
quote: Originally posted by faded glory
Outsourcing sucks too. ****in chinese. Or should I say, ****in corporate greed/Wal Mart. |
umm what else do u expect emerging markets to do? just hand us natural resources like they use to?!? increasing levels of productivity will probably not lead to the end of capitalism. but it sure gives u socialists more room to play in(thank capitalism for that).
|
|
|  |
 |
|
yavoon
|
|
quote: Originally posted by faded glory
Im not a Socialist. Im a protectionist. I say America for America first. None of this Slave Labor bullshit oversea's slowly strangling the middle-class. |
its not slave labor. if the workers weren't cheaper the corporations wouldn't move. and new markets wouldn't emerge.
stagnating in industrialization isn't going to help us.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
yavoon
|
|
quote: Originally posted by faded glory
Basically. I live in the "Rust Belt". (Southeast Wisconsin). Ive watched Case tractor factory go to mexico, Ive watched Miller light get bought out (and prepping to leave) Ive watched 2 Auto plants (Mercury, Ford) leave. I saw this year 2 local airlines go bankrupt, an airline assembly plant leave. 2 Johnson & Johnson factories not built here (instead going to Canada). Oh did I mention Twin Disc? Premdoor? Honda motor plant? Harley? The BIC lighter plant?They also left. All this in the last 4 years. Our city is so scarred and bankrupt from these guys leaving. There factories have been leveled and replaced with a Shopko, Menards, Super-Walmart all springing up like weeds and robbing people blind of economy and quality. And so far only 1 factory came here this year. A bombardier plant that closed in france and came here. |
kikass, steal from the french! yes I imagine living in the rustbelt would make life ruff. but u don't realize that ppl moved to that area because thats where the jobs were. when the jobs leave, the ppl should file out too! if u just stay in a place w/ no jobs.....
|
|
|  |
 |
|
yavoon
|
|
quote: Originally posted by faded glory
Im not going to mexico to get paid in sea-shells. What about you, buddy? Cause thats were everything is going. |
haha I did mean w/in the US. =D
|
|
|  |
 |
|
yavoon
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Kidicious
They shouldn't have to move. That is an inefficiency in itself. Greater exploitation is the only reason for the lose in jobs. That's no reason to uproot people who are doing better work than the Chinese can in the first place. |
what would u have the chinese do? its all well n good to demand that uneducated high paying jobs remain in the US. we should have probably also not roboticized. but I don't think its very practical.
if we shut the world out and kept our uneducated high paying jobs. and the rest of the world whirled itself in capitalism. we'd do nothing but fall behind.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
yavoon
|
|
quote: Originally posted by faded glory
Why? So in 5 years they leave to? You dont understand. EVERYTHING is leaving were losing about 5 manufacturing jobs to every 1 we get.
Oh wait. i left out a GE plant, General Chemical<--(my old work) , and a Kohler plant.
I think thats all.
Ya its difficult. The streets are getting really bad. Nobody can find a job. We have a 15% Unemployment here in Racine county. I guess it only gets worse. |
hey look. ur area use to be a boon. now the jobs are gone, and ur area will shrink. I'm certainly not willing to give u MY MONEY to prop ur inefficient uneducated occupation up. so unless u can convince someone else to hand ur ass money. I suggest to the ppl who can't get the jobs that are left that they move.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
yavoon
|
|
quote: Originally posted by faded glory
You know last year Wal-mart accounted for 1/8 of all imports into this country? (20 billion$)
We can all help bye boycotting them. Its all junk anyway. |
20 billion is 1/8th of all imports? that seems insanely low. where u get that number?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
yavoon
|
|
quote: Originally posted by faded glory
"hey look. ur area use to be a boon. now the jobs are gone, and ur area will shrink. I'm certainly not willing to give u MY MONEY to prop ur inefficient uneducated occupation up. so unless u can convince someone else to hand ur ass money. I suggest to the ppl who can't get the jobs that are left that they move"
We have. The population have been slashed this last decade bye 10%. Also call us inefficient? Puhleasee. They didnt leave cause we were lazy, they left cause Racine workers need more than 20,000$ a year to live. And every single corporation I mentioned above made a decison they could halve or even 1/4 it going somewhere like Mexico. |
I never said u were lazy=D. I meant inefficient from a corporate perspective.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
yavoon
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Kidicious
The exploitation of cheap labor is not helping us. It's inefficient and it's harmfull to those who lose their jobs. Maybe an international minimum wage would help, but maybe not. I'm just pointing out the weeknesses of capitalism. |
how would an emerging market get a job if they had NO comparitive advantages? in theory their only real advantage is their wage. everything else is a disadvantage.
like I said, shut america off from everyone and see how well we do.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
yavoon
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Kidicious
Why shouldn't everone pay for the cost of globalization? Everyone benefits. Actually the rich benefit more so they should pay more. The people who lose their jobs should be compensated by those who benefit. |
I don't see any inherent reason to compensate people just because their value has decreased. it happens to the rich too u know? should we compensate them?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
yavoon
|
|
quote: Originally posted by faded glory
"I meant inefficient from a corporate perspective."
Well if paying us enough money to eat/live is "Inefficient". Then I guess we are inefficient. Cause the only thing those ****** want is a few more Zero's in there bank account. |
yah ur basically right. a corporation exists to make money. that is the fundamental perspective. it can do other things, but if it ever gives up that it will cease to be.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
yavoon
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Kidicious
If they don't have a comparative advantage then trade isn't beneficial. You can get a comparative advantage by finding a way to actually produce something with less labor. That is efficient. Just paying your workers less in not a true comparative advantage because you haven't increased world output at all. You have just moved production from one place to another. |
well ur moving them from begging on the streets or subsistence farming into basically a part of the world economy. its like adding on cylinders that didn't exist before.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:30. Apolyton Time is 00:30. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|