 |
|  |
 |
|
Zylka
|
|
quote: Originally posted by The Templar
Most anti-choice people I have met (there are exceptions) are also pro-death penalty. One cannot be pro-life and pro-death penalty simultaneously. Should I call them pro-fetus? |
Maybe they're "pro-life until you set your mother on fire and/or blow several 7 year old girls heads off with a shotgun"? Have any fetuses ever done that? Just checking!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Zylka
|
|
...by the way, I'm against the death penalty as well - so save your breathe and add another to the "exception".
|
|
|  |
 |
|
st_swithin
|
|
10069
Nov 2002 time: 05:30
|
|
How far exactly is this going to go? Are there going to be 'zygote rights', and pre-mitotic gamete segregation?
Honestly, if guys were given the right, they'd give a vote to each and every new sperm cell they meiose.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
yavoon
|
|
quote: Originally posted by st_swithin
How far exactly is this going to go? Are there going to be 'zygote rights', and pre-mitotic gamete segregation?
Honestly, if guys were given the right, they'd give a vote to each and every new sperm cell they meiose. |
nice hyperbole but I think the pro life ppl only consider it after fertilization. since its like the hammer has been started on the clock.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Zylka
|
|
quote: Originally posted by The Templar
As for a guy who blows my family away - we've got life in prison for that. As for fetuses, they are infringing on the reproductive rights of women (if the woman does not want the fetus). Unfortunately, if the fetus is non-viable, it wont survive eviction. Do you have a point? |
My point is - the fetus did not "choose" to create itself, the host did so through carelessness. If the woman did not want the fetus "infringing on her reproductive rights", SHE SHOULDN'T HAVE SPREAD HER LEGS
It's a little too late to decide when the course of action is possibly murder. Do we need to go over the argument a 5th time to get it through your head?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Zylka
|
|
I AM ANTI WOMAN
DISCUSSION OVER!!!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Zylka
|
|
quote: Originally posted by The Templar
So what if a woman is raped? She didn't "spread her legs" in that case, but then again, the fetus did not "choose" to create itslef. |
So what if you read the entire thread, where I time and again established the fact that we are DEALING WITH MAJORITY ISSUE here - rather than the exceptions? That would have been helpful!
quote:
It's not murder. I (1) deny that the fetus is human. (2) even if the fetus were human, a woman's right to contol her body and reproductive capacity would outweigh any rights the fetus would have. |
1 - Simply because "you said so"? Gee, not even I am arrogant or delusional enough to arrive at the concrete conculsion of whether or not a fetus is always living. Given the significant opinion chance that it is (which you can and have NOT disproved) - YOU DON'T RISK MURDER
2 - In this case - A woman's right to control her body for 9 months after impregnating herself outweighs the rights of life of another. That's wonderful, thanks for coming out.
Last edited by Zylka on 05-08-2003 at 12:04
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Zylka
|
|
quote: Originally posted by monolith94
Zylka, your feelings on the subject would be exactly the same if you were a woman? |
How could I ever logically answer that? How could you?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Zylka
|
|
Oh. So I, as well as the rest of the world, should sit back gayly and concern ourselves only with the allowance and consequences of our own actions?
What do you call that world, exactly?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Zylka
|
|
quote: Originally posted by monolith94
I can answer it easily. Yeah, if I was a woman, my position on abortion would be the same.
|
Sorry - you can't answer that. A different body, brain and set of experiences leads to a different perception. If you believe you have an infinite gauge of response to perception pegged, you must be God.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
st_swithin
|
|
10069
Nov 2002 time: 05:30
|
|
You humans with your silly logic, while Kang and Kodos have each brought a board with a nail in it! KNEEL BEFORE US, PUNY MORTALS!! MUAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Zylka
|
|
No buddy. No matter what you say, you can not decide "what you would do" with an entirely different perception. I'm not getting semantic, I'm being realistic.
There will be no "If I was a woman, I would think the same" nor "If I was Hitler - I would have not started the war!". If you were anything but you, you wouldn't be you. If this isn't painfully obvious, I worry dearly for your future.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
st_swithin
|
|
10069
Nov 2002 time: 05:30
|
|
Dog is my copilot.
Bloody 'ell, where are me 'aitches goin'?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Zylka
|
|
quote: Originally posted by monolith94
"Oh. So I, as well as the rest of the world, should sit back gayly and concern ourselves only with the allowance and consequences of our own actions?
What do you call that world, exactly?"
Heaven
|
Ah. I hear heaven is lovely - with individuals running around (possibly) ruining or destroying existence for countless others (the examples are infinite) - yet it is only for them to decide their own right to do so and whether or not the consequences are other's business.
Semantics hurt, don't they. Furthermore, it looks like logic is the enemy of a sugar puff "the individual is always right, and has unlimited rights" Heaven.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Geronimo
|
|
st cloud USA
Jan 1970 time: 05:30
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Zylka
I AM ANTI WOMAN
DISCUSSION OVER!!! |
Well you've certainly alienated me now.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:30. Apolyton Time is 00:30. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|