 |
|  |
 |
|
JohnT

|
 |
Capitalist
Mar 1999 time: 00:30
|
|
I will. The president more of a target for Islamic terrorists than any one randomly picked 19 year old kid, and, barring that either of them serve out their terms without getting shot*, the decisions that have to be made by the President will age the man far more than the decisions made by a 19 year old grunt.
And before people start whining about how I'm minimizing the Army soldier, I'm not. You're the one who minimizes the amount of work that has to be done to be President (and an executive in general, but that's another thread).
* As far as physical danger is concerned, at least 8 out of 42 presidents have had assassination attempts against them some time within their political lives, plus don't forget about the number of Presidents who served on the battlefield including Tyler, Jackson, Grant, Eisenhower, Truman, and Washington, and a number who lived for a time with death sentences over their heads, Monroe, Jefferson, J & JQ Adams. That is 18 out of 44(?): I don't think 41% of the 19 year olds in Iraq are going to get shot or have a bounty placed on their names.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Kaak
|
|
quote: Hardest job my ass... tell that to the 19 year old kid on patrol in Baghdad... |
Ummm...as far as hard goes, those guys don't have to make decisions, they do what they are told. Not to mention the fact that I would venture to say statistics could show that being home is just as dangerous, with car wrecks, and all the other domestic hazards. Thousands of people die every day in the US, and we are only losing 1 soldier a day over there? Besides, Those kids signed up for the MILITARY. MILITARIES ARE FOR FIGHTING AND WARS. They did not get drafted, they chose to join. Their job is not to make decisions, it is to follow orders. That is what they signed up for. Dubya signed up for a job that consisted of making decisions. He can make decisions just as well in crawford as he can in DC. Your argument is foolish and holds no water.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Kaak
|
|
quote: and your friends dying around you |
with the number of troopswe have had over there vs the number of troops that have died, most "grunts" haven't even had one friend die around them, much less multiple friends...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kaak
|
|
my cousin is in a marine recon division, and he was battling on the front lines. He didn't lose a friend at all...
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
cinch
|
|
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Jul 2002 time: 22:30
|
|
I have to agree with Japher on this.
There is a time and a place for vacations. When Iraq is still a mess, and there's a lot of confusion as to whent things are going to quiet down: it's not the best time to go off to Crawford.
As for the President having the hardest job in the world... I disagree. I definitely think the work the coalition army is doing in Iraq is harder than the tasks taken on by Bush (considering the amount of advisors and helpers and such he has, and the fact that he's in a much less volatile environment).
The facts are: people are dying in Iraq, Bush just told the soldiers that they'll be staying there for a much longer haul then anticipated... while he goes to relax at his ranch. That just doesn't seem to go hand in hand with 'great leadership'.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:30. Apolyton Time is 00:30. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|