 |
|
Albert Speer
|
|
Puerile Polemic
Mar 1999
time: 00:30
|
|
the Japanese were mass producing wooden kamikazi planes... those things alone would've killed more americans and japanese pilots than the a-bombs did... and don't forget how the germans had sent u-boats with nuclear material to the japanese... their nuclear program wouldn't have gone anywhere but that material could have been released against the invading americans...
|
|
| |
|
|
|
MichaeltheGreat
|
|
Apolyton Grand Executioner
|
 |
mooning the house that Ruth built.
Oct 1999
time: 21:30
|
|
Speer - bullshit, they couldn't get those off the ground. The nuclear material they had was also useless, but the Japanese were training ten year old kids to use bamboo spears in invasion defense, as well is imposing such stringent rationing on everything that the winter of 1945-46 would have been hell for the Japanese, while the US prepared for the invasion.
I think the Nagasaki bomb was premature. After Hiroshima, the Japanese didn't believe what initial reports they got - they thought the whole thing was hysteria, but communication and transport was so bad they hadn't even gotten people credible to IJA HQ in Tokyo into Hiroshima to assess things firsthand.
Nagasaki wasn't even an intended target (that was Niigata), but it was the third alternate, and the only one that had clear weather when LeMay made the decision for the second drop. Had there been a week's delay, it's pretty likely the Japanese would have gone through the same aborted coup/assassination/peace process they did after Nagasaki, without the need for using the second bomb.
Nothing the Japanese could do in that time would affect US forces, so there was no particular need to drop the second one three days after the first.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Albert Speer
|
|
Puerile Polemic
Mar 1999
time: 00:30
|
|
MtG:
http://vikingphoenix.com/public/Jap...45/jp-abomb.htm
as for the kamikazis... i read that they had several thousand 'planes' availible to use for kamikaze purposes... and though he was probably exaggerating, when jap admiral Kantaro Suzuki told the Japanese gov't in June 1945 that he had thousands of aircraft and pilots ready for kamikaze missions, there was probably truth in his statements. they probably wouldn't be sending out real planes or their piloted v-1's, but i'm sure world war 1 style wood and canvas planes could be mass produced with the bare minimum to get them flying.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970
time: 05:30
|
|
MtG,
quote:
Nagasaki wasn't even an intended target (that was Niigata), |
Actually, the primary was Kokura, IIRC.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Albert Speer
|
|
Puerile Polemic
Mar 1999
time: 00:30
|
|
yeah thats right... nagasaki was a mistake... always found it odd that such a historical city was wiped out by the allies... but i figured if they did it to dresden they could just as easily do it to nagasaki.
one anti-bomb position that always annoys me is the "there's no problem nuking the yellow man" theory... don't yall hate this arguement that somehow the US wouldn't have used the bomb on the white germans but loved to use it on the japanese? talk about bullshit ideas...
|
|
| |
|
|
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970
time: 05:30
|
|
Nagasaki had a couple of points that made it a target.
First, it hadn't yet been heavily firebombed, and was relatively intact.
Second, it had two major factories, a steel works, and the large Mitsubishi shipyards (which, incidentally, made the torpedos used at Pearl Harbor).
Thirdly, it's location relative to Kokura was an advantage - that is, it was on the opposite side of a mountain range, the idea being that if Kokura was fogged, Nagasaki would be clear.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
MichaeltheGreat
|
|
Apolyton Grand Executioner
|
|
mooning the house that Ruth built.
Oct 1999
time: 21:30
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by David Floyd
MtG,
Actually, the primary was Kokura, IIRC. |
Prior to the orders being given, the intent originally was to hit Niigata, on the Sea of Japan side, with land access to Tokyo, the idea being the Japanese C&C could assess their likely future more easily if they didn't have to cross USA owned seas and airspace. You couldn't divert a mission from northwestern Honshu to southern Kyushu due to the distance, so Niigata was never put on the actual tasking order for Bock's Car (the B-29 sent up to drop the bomb.) on the 9th, because the weather forecast for the Niigata area was almost complete cloud cover.
Somewhere in my collection of stuff, I have a photo of ground zero as it is today, taken from my bedroom window in the apartment I lived in when I was in Nagasaki. The Mitsubishi factory is back, as is the naval base.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Albert Speer
|
|
Puerile Polemic
Mar 1999
time: 00:30
|
|
quote:
the apartment I lived in when I was in Nagasaki. |
thats settles it, mtg... you are the most worldly (in the good way) person i have ever encountered. how old are you by the way?
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Albert Speer
|
|
Puerile Polemic
Mar 1999
time: 00:30
|
|
so the legend goes...
|
|
| |
|
|
|
MichaeltheGreat
|
|
Apolyton Grand Executioner
|
|
mooning the house that Ruth built.
Oct 1999
time: 21:30
|
|
You have to watch a bit for any site that uses "Japan Inc." in it's address, or anywhere else.
They shipped two loads of Uranium Oxide on type IX U-boots. That does not a real nuclear program make. Among many things, the Uranium compound of choice for separation at that time was Uranium Hexafluoride. The Japanese had none of the necessary centrifuging facilities to make enough enriched Uranium for a bomb in any reasonable time frame, they didn't have adequate engineering time, or machining capability for the mechanical package, nor did they have a bomber of any type that could carry a realistic sized bomb package. The whole country didn't have a thousandth the computational capacity available at Los Alamos. All the Japanese had was some Uranium and a vague fantasy, plus a small number of talented physicists. Even if left alone (other than the routine pace of bombing with no special targeting), they wouldn't have been able to make a bomb within even five years, and the country would have collapsed far sooner than that anyway.
quote:
as for the kamikazis... i read that they had several thousand 'planes' availible to use for kamikaze purposes... and though he was probably exaggerating, when jap admiral Kantaro Suzuki told the Japanese gov't in June 1945 that he had thousands of aircraft and pilots ready for kamikaze missions, there was probably truth in his statements. they probably wouldn't be sending out real planes or their piloted v-1's, but i'm sure world war 1 style wood and canvas planes could be mass produced with the bare minimum to get them flying. |
They'd still need engines, or to be towed from other planes and deployed as gliders. "Reality" was more along the lines that insane and impossible home defense orders were issued, and everyone reported compliance, although reality was orders of magnitude different. We were routinely attacking Japanese airfields on the ground, and we owned the Inland Sea at that time, so there was virtually no fuel and next to nothing flying. The reason the A-bomb planes went in practically alone was simple - the Japanese were so limited in fuel, planes and ordnance that they wouldn't fly unless there was what they thought was a critical threat - and a lone bomber, or a small group, wasn't worth the limited fuel available to go after it.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Zylka
|
|
Little known fact: Nelso Mandela isn't all he's made out to be. A "dark past" is all I'll say. Anyone else with the knowledge like to share?
|
|
| |
|
|
|
yavoon
|
|
I'd like to lodge a complaint. to ask "is hiroshima justified" but then switch the wording to necessary in the poll isnt being consistent. worse yet u switch from necessary to should, then to needed? whoa.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Geronimo
|
|
st cloud USA
Jan 1970
time: 05:30
|
|
MTG, I think the chemistry to derive the uranium hexafluoride from uranium oxide would have been one of the least daunting steps in the production of suitable bomb material.
If the facts in the article could all be believed, it seems that Japan would have been totally precluded from building an A-bomb only by it's lack of computational capabilities and by the general disruption of the allied bombings.
Last edited by Geronimo on 06-08-2003 at 14:02
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Zylka
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Sir Ralph
Using nuclear weapons on civilians is a crime tenfold worse than, say, flying a plane in a building, and its cruelty is topped only by the crimes of the nazis themselves. |
 Attachment: kityscared.jpeg
This has been downloaded 291 time(s).
|
|
| |
|
|
|
David Floyd
|
|
The bottom of a large bottle of beer
Jan 1970
time: 05:30
|
|
MtG,
Niigata was originally one of four priority targets (others being Hiroshima, HQ of Japanese 2nd Army and an industrial target, Kokura, an industrial target, and Kyoto, a major industrial city). Kyoto was replaced by Henry Stimson with Nagasaki, which I'm sure you know.
Now, Niigata may have been considered a priority target, but it was never the primary or secondary target for either mission - the first mission's priority order was Hiroshima, Kokura, and Nagasaki, and the second mission's order was Kokura, then Nagasaki. Again, because of the presence of Kokura on the priority list, Niigata was precluded because of distance.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Proteus_MST
|
|
I don´t think they were necessary.
After all I have read to date,
it seems that even without the Bombings the Japanese Government was more and more ready for Peacetalks.
So I don´t think, that the A-Bombs have significantly shortened the war.
I think it was maybe less than a month. The Number of american and japanese) Soldiers saved never ever justifies the much higher number of Civilians casualties due to the Bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
And, if you had to test the new Weapon, one Bomb should have been sufficient. Afterwards you already knew how much Damage this Weapons produce (as you,without doubt had Planes flying over Hiroshima afterwards and taking Photographs).
And it was also sufficient to demonstrate the power of american Weapons to the Tenno.
And so I think especially the second Bomb was by no means justified.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
CerberusIV
|
|
The political situation at the time made use of the A bombs inevitable. Germany had surrendered and Japan was beaten. The politicians were thinking about what next. Dropping at least one bomb shortened the war and saved US lives - that was Truman's concern, not Japanese lives. It also sent a powerful signal setting out America's claim to influence the post WW2 world.
Was it justified? At the time, yes. By our current standards, attitudes and knowledge of nuclear weapons, no.
Hindsight is wonderful, particularly for the amount of BS it can generate.
|
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:30.
Apolyton Time is 00:30. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
06-08-2003 10:22
. I was going to make it back then, but thought better of it. 
|
