Apolyton Archive  |  Preserved copy of the Apolyton Civilization Site and its forums as they stood in September 2005. Read-only; nothing here can be posted to or replied to.  |  Forum index |  About this archive |  The 1998–2001 UBB forums
Today on Apolyton WARDELL INTERVIEW PROMO A.C.S. HISTORY CHAPTER 4 GET CIV4 /w FREE PLUS! A.C.S. PHOTO GALLERY GET A.O.M. V1.1
Apolyton Civilization Forums
main| civ2| civ3| civ4| smac| ctp2| ron| moo3| galciv| galciv2| alt| about|
ApolytonPLUS | register | search | faq | new posts | pm (-/-) | upload | members
hall of fame new! | civgroups | civgroups news | interviews | the column | radio | chat | directory | news | store | PLUS
Apolyton Civilization Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.0.3 Apolyton Civilization Forums > Civilization III > Civ3-PtW Democracy Game > C3PtWDG Legoland > Operation: Glorious Plastic
Show a Printable Version | Email This Page to Someone! | Receive updates to this thread | Report this to Apolyton news!
16.Sep: 7 NEW FILES
15.Sep: TRIAL + NO SLEEP = ONE GAME
13.Sep: PATCH THE PREVIOUSLY UNPATCHABLE

bottom of page
   - CIV3 CONQUESTS $29.99 - CIV3 from $9.99
Author
Thread   
Pages (5): [ 1   2   3   4   5   ]
< Last Thread     Next Thread > Post New Thread     Post A Reply
lmtoops is offline lmtoops
King
Dallas, Texas
Mar 2002
time: 23:30
  Old Post 10-11-2003 07:52
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#61 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy GURPS/ Alpha Centauri

Very interesting....we will have to see how this plays out.

vondrack is offline vondrack

Emperor
Praha, Czech Republic
Jan 2002
time: 06:30
  Old Post 11-11-2003 17:44
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#62 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

And perhaps, there are more questions we should ask...

This just from Hot_Enamel:

quote:
GoodDay to you Radek,

I have some more thoughts/concerns I felt I should share with you...



Quite a few turns back, I was confused with some of the troop movements by GS. They were building roads directly at us, and sent a settler & SOD. I thought they would claim the spice luxeries SW of Barcelona. But they sent it directly west...straight on top of the saltpeter.

This was our first major battle with GS, as we could not allow them to accidently build a city on that saltpeter.

I commented in our forum, that I thought it strange that they beelined for the saltpeter when they really should not know where it is.

Today, GS let it slip (intentional or not) that they know they have been screwed on the resources allocation., and hinted that they know where they want to settle if we agree to allowing them on Bob. They have also demanded that we give them all of our techs. We laughed at that one and simply said it was never going to happen. They currently have a road right on top of the saltpeter, and I suspect a worker or a settler nearby, if they ever get the gunpowder tech.

So... my concern is that someone from one of the teams "in the know", have told that they do not have saltpeter...and worse still, they have provided GS with a map, on where exactly on bob, there is a source.

Do you have any thoughts or suspicions? I admit, it is quite possible one of the "braggers" from GoW may not help themselves and have told GS of their lack of saltpeter, but I doubt anyone would supply them with a map or directions.

Anyway ... keeping you up to date...

Regs

Warwick

This is getting VERY serious, guys. Anyone has anything to comment on this? It was me (at least me, maybe even others) eventually telling Arnelos/RP that "some teams were screwed on resources" - even though much later than the battle mentioned by H_E happened.

But there was no way GS or RP could have known where the saltpeter was. Either thery were cheating or there was a traitor in GoW, ND, or our team.

ZargonX is offline ZargonX
Emperor
Space
Sep 2002
time: 00:30
  Old Post 11-11-2003 21:06
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#63 Report this post to a moderator
Full PM-box? Change here!

Yes, even if they determined that they were screwed on Stormia, there is no way they could have known an exact location of saltpeter without someone telling them. It's either just amazing coincidence, someone leaking classified info (which I feel is incredibly unlikely), or they have "obtained" a map some other way.

vondrack is offline vondrack

Emperor
Praha, Czech Republic
Jan 2002
time: 06:30
  Old Post 11-11-2003 21:21
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#64 Report this post to a moderator
Help yourself to an AD-FREE life

I went through some of the older posts and found out the battle H_E mentioned (the first big battle between our allies and GS) happened before we discovered gunpowder - means before anyone legally knew where saltpeter was. Which means the fact GS moved their units there is not really a reason to suspect a leak of confidential information (as there was nothing that could have been leaked, so to say, "legally").

It might have been a coincidence and GS might have a plan not related to saltpeter at that time. It, however, does not explain GS' hint today at that they know about where saltpeter is on Bob - though if I understand it correctly, it was not said directly, but rather hinted at.

ZargonX is offline ZargonX
Emperor
Space
Sep 2002
time: 00:30
  Old Post 11-11-2003 21:56
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#65 Report this post to a moderator
Inflate your Upload Space

Looking back, the only thing RP should have been able to infer from the chat you had with them was that they were screwed on saltpeter. There was no mention made of GS. That would lead me to believe that someone on GoW may have been trash-talking and let something slip

vondrack is offline vondrack

Emperor
Praha, Czech Republic
Jan 2002
time: 06:30
  Old Post 11-11-2003 22:01
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#66 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton or Terrorists Win

Yes, that's true - I did not mention anything about GS. Though it would have been easy to misinterpret what I said and believe (correctly, btw) that it was even GS lacking saltpeter. Not sure.

But the real deal here is that saltpeter resource W of Barcelona. If they really know about it, as seems to be the case - where did the info come from? Trash-talking is a great opportunity to let a piece of general info slip through, but you do not give away the exact location of a key strategic resource...

I am quite puzzled by all this...

ZargonX is offline ZargonX
Emperor
Space
Sep 2002
time: 00:30
  Old Post 11-11-2003 22:30
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#67 Report this post to a moderator
Increase the size of your Attachments

Yes, indeed. I would hope that no one would be so thick-headed as to give away such a critical piece of info as part of a taunt. GoW and ND are going to have to shakedown their own team members to find out if anyone let something slip, and if everything is ok on their end, well... that just leaves a mystery

vondrack is offline vondrack

Emperor
Praha, Czech Republic
Jan 2002
time: 06:30
  Old Post 12-11-2003 02:26
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#68 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton

A PM from Aggie:

quote:
As it happened we had a "secret " chat with Theseus and Cort Haus. They are under the impression that Lego will hlep in a war against ND. The deal they offered us was along these lines.
1.They make RP leave Bob.
2. We three then gang up on ND. After that war we get the north half of Bob and you all three split the south.

Obviously this will not happen. I could not in good conscience betray an ally(particularyly one that has been so helpful and loyal) this way. Additionally I have submitted a proposal to my team for RP to remain on Bob. Basically this would give them the area from Bilboa to Barcelona(maybe a little more north or south of there). This would give them 1 or 2 lux but no resources and they could exist in some state. I am not sure that GS will agree to this, but am only negotiating with RP on this issue. If they agree(something Togas said was possible, but not sure), this would leave GS with no presence on BOB and I know they want a presence. The way I see it, GS is the danger since RP is effectively out of the running so peace with Rp now makes sense. Also it would make GS say the truth "they are doing this for territory not to save RP".

Here's why they want a presence, they believe that "saltpeter is scare". Somehow they found out about, or at least suspect, their lack of SP(It is possible that they are bluffing on this though and want us to give away where SP is located). They also said they believed they could not win if they didn't have some of Bob. Since they didn't say directly that they need territory on Bob for SP purposes, it is possible that they have done tile counts and figure they will be out produced and built if they have Stormia only.

On the worker for breaking Iron front, I left one on your path, but not in a slowing down position. If you want to pillage a tile that is ok too and might even be better. Considering the distance from our capital to skulgaria there is a good chance that the extra commerce from the road will be taken from corruption.
Best wishes
Patrick

Ps. here is the map of proposed RP Reservation

vondrack is offline vondrack

Emperor
Praha, Czech Republic
Jan 2002
time: 06:30
  Old Post 12-11-2003 02:30
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#69 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton or Terrorists Win

Aside from silently ignoring the fact that we should perhaps explain how come GS is under impression we'd help in a war against ND, there is something worth some debate.

GoW (and ND, I assume) apparently consider the possibility of not finishing RP off completely, but letting them live in a "reservation". Do we like this or not? Is that good for us or not?

Tiberius is offline Tiberius

Emperor
Europe
Jan 2000
time: 06:30
  Old Post 12-11-2003 02:59
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#70 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization: The Boardgame

quote:
As it happened we had a "secret " chat with Theseus and Cort Haus. They are under the impression that Lego will hlep in a war against ND.


Gee, I wonder where did they take this idea from?

Tiberius is offline Tiberius

Emperor
Europe
Jan 2000
time: 06:30
  Old Post 12-11-2003 03:18
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#71 Report this post to a moderator
Lose 30 kilos (of popups)

quote:
Originally posted by vondrack
GoW (and ND, I assume) apparently consider the possibility of not finishing RP off completely, but letting them live in a "reservation". Do we like this or not? Is that good for us or not?


I believe that not finishing off RP completely is both good and bad for us.
Bad because they will mess again in the foreign relations arena with all of their stupid accusations and plots and whatnot.
Good, because consequently GoW and ND will have less land and one more neighbour to worry about. The best thing about it is that actually GS will gain nothing from this war. Which is why they won't be happy with this solution.

Finally I think that we don't really have a say in this regard. It is GoW and ND fighting this war, they know better how far they can strech with this war, how much is worth for them to have that corner of Bob, too.

The solution is clearly bad for GS, GoW and ND, so it must be good for us

redstar1 is offline redstar1
Prince
Belfast, Northern Ireland
Apr 2001
time: 05:30
  Old Post 12-11-2003 03:22
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#72 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization: The Boardgame

Taking this plan as it appears.....

I assume the grey areas are cities GS want?

On the whole I think we could probably live with this. We could perhaps stretch 'no GS on bob' to 'very limited ubht controlled' GS on bob, especially if RP were to do a 'Vox'.

This would ensure RP aren't a contender, while reducing GOW/ND ins size.

While the war has been good to us, and will continue to be if it continues on its present course... its not going to do us a lot of good if we get dragged into an expensive conflict.

On the other hand, is this a veiled attempt by GS to divert their quest for land from Bob to Legos?

Towards the end of hostilities on Bob, we have really got to start looking at our defences...

Tiberius is offline Tiberius

Emperor
Europe
Jan 2000
time: 06:30
  Old Post 12-11-2003 03:29
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#73 Report this post to a moderator
Increase Your PM Length

The trick about GS is not letting them build a FP on Bob. They need a second productive core, and the ex-Vox territories are probably not of their liking. Letting them build one or two cities on Bob doesn't do any harm to us.

As for our home defences: top priority!

ZargonX is offline ZargonX
Emperor
Space
Sep 2002
time: 00:30
  Old Post 12-11-2003 03:35
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#74 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, pre-order Civilization IV

Well, it's not really up to us whether RP lives or dies, but if ND and GoW are willing to keep them around, it does hold benefits for us, as have been listed above. Of course, it does also leave open the possiblity that when the time is ripe, RP may just hand all its cities over to GS to use as the invasion front, but maybe I'm just being paranoid

Vondrack, do you want to contact GoW and explain that we ARE NOT allying with GS against ND, or should I do it?

vondrack is offline vondrack

Emperor
Praha, Czech Republic
Jan 2002
time: 06:30
  Old Post 12-11-2003 03:58
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#75 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition

quote:
Originally posted by redstar1
I assume the grey areas are cities GS want?

I do not think so. I believe it's what Aggie mentioned here:
quote:
Basically this would give them the area from Bilboa to Barcelona(maybe a little more north or south of there)

I believe Aggie stated quite clearly GS would have no presence at all on Bob:
quote:
I am not sure that GS will agree to this, but am only negotiating with RP on this issue. If they agree(something Togas said was possible, but not sure), this would leave GS with no presence on BOB and I know they want a presence.

I agree that some land for RP means less land for GoW/ND, which is just fine. We would certainly not mind that. The cost would be having to cope with RP being around, which we have learned is troublesome. I also agree that we will have little say about what GoW & ND decide - the reason for asking was that we still could say one way or another, if we wanted - perhaps with little effect, but we could try. But I can see that we pretty much feel the way I felt after reading the PM: oh, well, we will be able to live with that.

Good points re: FP and second core for GS, homeland defenses, possibility of GS turning their eyes towards us (though that would be at least as far as Navigation).

quote:
Originally posted by ZargonX
Vondrack, do you want to contact GoW and explain that we ARE NOT allying with GS against ND, or should I do it?

I will handle that. I will send a short PM and further explain in Thursday chat.

Finally - do not forget that this is just something that is being discussed. Fortunately for us, we can handle it either way, unlike, say, GS. Unless something really unexpected happens, I would expect GS to attack soon, maybe even despite peace talks between GoW/ND and RP. If they are lucky, they will improve the negotiating position of theirs and RP. If they fail miserably, they just end up with what they'd end up if withdrawing without a fight - i.e. with nothing. And trying to turn the tide with some 30 odd knights conveniently deployed on Bob certainly is easier than to invade from scratch at a later date (especially if they suspect a lack of saltpeter).

lmtoops is offline lmtoops
King
Dallas, Texas
Mar 2002
time: 23:30
  Old Post 12-11-2003 04:48
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#76 Report this post to a moderator
Inflate your Upload Space

I think this would be a good solution or us.

Disadvantages:
- RP is still around to cause problems, but they are so small ( ) that it'll just be background noise.
- I can invision RP gifting their cities to GS. At least there is no SP in the territory.

Advantage:
- Less Bob for ND and GoW
- Peace...we do not have to worry about getting deeper into this war.

In the end, the plan is good for us but I don't see GS going for it. If RP agrees to the plan, they'll just get run over by GS. GS is unlikely to win with just Estonia and they have no SP. They will not sit still for this. So my vote is to support the peace plan, but don't be surprised when it fails.

We will never know how GS knows about the the SP, so I'll not even worry about it. Let's officially blame it on delmar

Tiberius is offline Tiberius

Emperor
Europe
Jan 2000
time: 06:30
  Old Post 12-11-2003 10:58
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#77 Report this post to a moderator
Browse Apolyton AD-FREE

quote:
Originally posted by lmtoops
Let's officially blame it on delmar


That's a good one

Maybe we should hint GoW to include a clause in their future peace agreement with RP, denying them to gift cities to GS. What do you think?

ZargonX is offline ZargonX
Emperor
Space
Sep 2002
time: 00:30
  Old Post 12-11-2003 11:20
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#78 Report this post to a moderator
Get a bigger avatar today!

quote:
Maybe we should hint GoW to include a clause in their future peace agreement with RP, denying them to gift cities to GS. What do you think?


Yes, good idea. That is definately in GoW's best interest, and they should know it.

redstar1 is offline redstar1
Prince
Belfast, Northern Ireland
Apr 2001
time: 05:30
  Old Post 12-11-2003 14:46
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#79 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Alpha Centauri

Might also be worthwhile them asking for right of Naval passage. GOW/ND could station a sentry vessel or two to keep an eye on any comings or goings between Bob/Stormia.

vondrack is offline vondrack

Emperor
Praha, Czech Republic
Jan 2002
time: 06:30
  Old Post 14-11-2003 02:51
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#80 Report this post to a moderator
Increase the size of your Attachments

Thursday Alliance chat @ #gow_cofa:

quote:
Session Start: Thu Nov 13 21:32:58 2003
Session Ident: #gow_cofa
* Now talking in #gow_cofa
Darekill: Hi!
vondrack: hi!
vondrack: sorry for being late again
Aggie: i agree, hopefully GS will attack alamo this turn. Otherwise no purpose in putting knights just north of Alamo
Aggie: hi
Aggie: thats alright
vondrack: go on now, I will wait until you are done - I have some agenda then to talk about
Aggie: we were talking about togas' response to peace map. It was very negative
vondrack: I see
vondrack: well, I am not surprised
vondrack: RPers do not excel in realizing their chances
Aggie: hehe
Aggie: nope but it was weird a little because he PM"ed like he was in real trouble
vondrack: in real trouble before you talked about the map or now rejecting the proposal?
Aggie: when he first PM'ed me wondering if there was anyway they could stay on bob. He seemed to think GS was pulling out of the war
vondrack: and now he changed the tone?
Aggie: yap
Darekill: Ah that was his fear. That guy is really a flag in the wind....
Aggie: when we first talked I suggested southern bob. But when I sent the map I decided that the se coast BOB was best. he didn't like that
Zayxus: asking for our response to peace is a test of our force and mood too.
vondrack: you think it was the location that caused the change of attitude?
vondrack: let me report/clarify something, please
vondrack: we have had a, uh, rather unfortunate incident in Lego
vondrack: it's quite embarrasing, but I feel you need to know
vondrack: two of our members with no authorization from the team
vondrack: went ahead and organized a chat with GS (Theseus & Cort Haus) on their own
vondrack: they discussed options and presented views which were by most part only their own
vondrack: they feeded GS with a good deal of information and misinformation at the same time
vondrack: let me sum what they did/said:
vondrack: a) they said we had a defensive alliance with GoW
vondrack: that is to be triggered by GS invasion of your homelands
vondrack: as that has not happened yet, "Legoland has remained uninvolved so far"
vondrack: uhm
vondrack: b) they accidentally revealed that we were allied to ND, too
vondrack: (something GS did not know or at least was not sure about)
vondrack: c) they made the impression that Lego's main concern was how to avoid fight
vondrack: as in how do to it to not have to honour our promises
vondrack: d) they made it quite clear Lego would prefer if GoW made a backstab deal with GS (against ND)
vondrack: e) and the worst...
vondrack: they told them we would not support an invasion of Stormia
vondrack: GRRRRRRRRR
vondrack: one of them, the one who organized the thing
vondrack: is no longer a member of Lego
vondrack: the chatlog he posted caused a riot in our team
vondrack: he received _NO_ support whatsoever for what he did
vondrack: and left the team without saying a single word
vondrack: NOW
vondrack: I would like to make it crystal clear
vondrack: that everything he said during that chat
vondrack: and everything that GS now may hint at
vondrack: IS NOT TRUE
vondrack: it was only his personal effort
vondrack: NOT representing the sentiment in our team
vondrack: as was very apparent by what happened in our forum
vondrack: after he posted the log
vondrack: I would like to make it clear that:
vondrack: a) Lego fully stands behind everything we promised
vondrack: b) Lego prefers Bob equally divided between GoW and ND
vondrack: c) Lego wishes no GS presence on Bob
vondrack: d) Lego would really prefer not having to fight, but only on condition that GS does not invade your homeland
vondrack: if they invade, we are ready to fulfil our part of the alliance duties, no matter what
vondrack: e) we really do not support any invasion of Stormia, but we would prefer if GS did not know... :/
vondrack: finally, I am feeling extremely embarrased that anything like this happened
vondrack: I knew that member was feeling unhappy about the current course of Lego
vondrack: but had no idea he would go as far as this, pretending to represent Lego on this level
vondrack: obviously, this has had implications
vondrack: I suspect that GS (+RP) may now believe that Lego is not really all that hot to join war on your side
Darekill: well the invasion has already begun. There are GS Knights near yellowknife. I do not belive in picnics. It was us who set up the first picnic and I know what it was about
vondrack: I know
Aggie: thank you, but no need to be embarrassed, we can't control all members of our team. To be honest people on my team have made really obnoxious statements that i was embarrassed about in the past
vondrack: I was more or less quoting
vondrack: so, that's about it
vondrack: I know this has messed things up
Darekill: Never mind Vondrack, you are not to blame
vondrack: but I wanted you to know, so that you understand what this or that GS/RP says mean
vondrack: personally, not
vondrack: but as a representative of my team, I am
Aggie: actually in a way it might help us. If GS attacks and fails (and they will fail) then RP will really find themselves in trouble and so will GS.
vondrack: true
Darekill: do you really think GS is foolish enough to attack?
vondrack: I believe they will attack if they feel there is nothing to gain through negotiating
vondrack: as all they could lose would be some knights on Bob
Aggie: well there is no other reason to put troops next to alamo if they weren't. We hit them with cats every turn they're there. either they use them of lose them
vondrack: yeah
vondrack: any idea what's up with Voxes?
Darekill: good then their knights are minced meat.
Aggie: no idea,maybe beta is playing conquest
Darekill: no we do not know. It may have to do with an offer we made but i doubt it.
vondrack: ?
Darekill: we rejected to buy printing press
vondrack: I see
Zayxus: ...and offered luxus cheap
Darekill: and offered them to pay them for another tech they may research by givin pp to them and add some compensation and a luxury
vondrack: ah, ok, I understand - they may need to discuss that a bit
Darekill: maybe but it's not such an important thing.
Darekill: and it is not pressing since we need lots of turns to get ready with pp...
vondrack: alright
vondrack: well, anyway...
vondrack: back to that rogue chat
vondrack: do you think we should do anything about it?
vondrack: like restating our official position
vondrack: whatever
Aggie: lets see how GS does this turn
vondrack: we are obviously going to inform them that the chat was done with no authorization
vondrack: and that our official message still stands
vondrack: but I am quite sure we are still not going to get back to where we were before that chat
vondrack: in terms of 'sternness' of our warning
Darekill: seeing your knights in the north is stern enough don't you think?
vondrack: do they see them yet?
Aggie: nope
Aggie: they are on the wrong side of the hills
vondrack: that is hopefully the only thing they still do not know
vondrack: because that was, at least according to the log, not mentioned
Darekill: GS could think that the rouge chat was a trap to pull them in a war with you...
Zayxus: the only really new idea was: Lego would not attack Estonia, but that does not really matter in the next turns
vondrack: yeah
Zayxus: By the warning of Lego the other information by the chat are not the brand news.
Aggie: next turn GS either will retreat or move to attack yellowknife or move n.ne to a hill where they can threaten both Yellowknife and Port Isolation
Aggie: But Pi has a wall and YK will be 7 with musks
vondrack: good
Zayxus: how is PI defended by units?
Aggie: 3pike+3Riders, but more can get there next turn
Aggie: before GS is in postion
Aggie: its exactly 3 tiles between the 2 cities so it makes defesne easy
Darekill: g
Zayxus: what could knights of Lego do?
Zayxus: ...move?
vondrack: we need 2 turns to gather all 9 South of Skulgaria
vondrack: once there, they will be ready to take upon whatever will be needed
Zayxus: Did get Lego the ROP?
vondrack: we are still waiting for the save
Darekill: sorry I have some buisiness with the Barbs over in Webringen
vondrack: Aggie, how's your plans re: Chemistry research?
Aggie: we'll start soon. in 2 turns i think. We had to have a few musk upgrades first. But i have some libaries coming up so that will help
vondrack: k
vondrack: we will be starting Banking this turn
Aggie: right now we could research chem in 8, but don't know with GA ending in 4 turns. But the libaries should offset this
vondrack: sounds cool
vondrack: ETA for Banking will be ~8 turns
Aggie: alright
Aggie: one thing is for certain. GS is far behind on tech now
vondrack: yep, still lacking Inv
Aggie: one thing GS wanted for peace was "all our techs". I was amazed unortho didn't laugh in their face
vondrack: hehe, yes
vondrack: I heard about that
Aggie: it was an unproductive meeting
Aggie: took them 3hours to get to the point
vondrack: ...which was ridiculous anyway
Aggie: yap
Aggie: luckily conquest hadn't arrived so i had the time
vondrack:
Darekill: Uh oh...
Darekill: Have to go now sorry boys.
Darekill: Bye bye.
vondrack: k, see you next week
Aggie: bye Dk
* Darekill has left #gow_cofa
Zayxus: bye
vondrack: well, I guess I will go, too
vondrack: stayed up very late yesterday
Zayxus: yes I could go too
Aggie: well then go rest
vondrack: ok, guys, take care
vondrack: and talk to you in a week
vondrack: bye
Aggie: talk to you later
Aggie: bye
Session Close: Thu Nov 13 22:35:19 2003


I hope the GS chat is not going to bite us back again at least with our allies.

Otherwise... just note, please, that GoW & ND actually WANT to see GS attacking them this turn. My guess is that Alamo is heavily garrisoned (as is Yellowknife).

redstar1 is offline redstar1
Prince
Belfast, Northern Ireland
Apr 2001
time: 05:30
  Old Post 14-11-2003 03:11
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#81 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization III: Complete

They seem fairly confident that GS aren't going to cause any major problems. We would be quite happy if GS continually throw units at cities. However, putting myself in GS shoes, a defeat of this scale would perhaps be the last straw and I would start looking for an alternative....

If they catch sight of our units the psycological effect may be quite great. I imagine they have estimated GOW strength in the area, but 9 knights should throw the calculaions off somewhat. Especially if they realise we are in position to counter attack any offensive.

Looking good for us.... on a global scale at least...

The information about Togas' behaviour is quite interesting at least. It may seem that RP are no longer a concern for ANY of the other teams

vondrack is offline vondrack

Emperor
Praha, Czech Republic
Jan 2002
time: 06:30
  Old Post 24-11-2003 02:22
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#82 Report this post to a moderator
Enter the AD-FREE zone

Oops, sorry - forgot to post the log from Thursday. Nothing new, just Aggie talking about the proposed "contract" with GS:

quote:
Session Start: Thu Nov 20 21:00:58 2003
Session Ident: #gow_cofa
* Now talking in #gow_cofa
vondrack: hi, everybody!
MasterZen: hey
vondrack: a rare guest here today
Aggie: hi there
vondrack: hi, Aggie
vondrack: any luck with the save?
MasterZen: yeah well its a national holiday, don't have anything better to do
vondrack: ah )
Aggie: haven't heard from Trip yet
vondrack: I have recalled something
vondrack: not sure if it's worth mentioning
vondrack: last turn
vondrack: when I opened the save, GoW offered us "nothing" as "accepted"
vondrack: the trading screen was blank and accepted by you
Aggie: THats weird
vondrack: I just ESCaped the screen, I think
Aggie: hummm
Aggie: i suspect there are large bugs crawling under the surface causing problems
vondrack: yeah, seems so
vondrack: the fact that PtWDG teams push the game to the limits (using all kind of 'tricks') does not help either, I guess
Aggie: its a shame they don't beta test by having a demogame. That would really give the game a good checkup
vondrack: true
MasterZen: well, that beta test would last 2 years :P
Aggie: sadly
vondrack: hehe
Aggie: or 5
vondrack: true, too
MasterZen: do you know what the sad thing is?
vondrack: rhetoric question, I take it...
Aggie: what
MasterZen: universal access to the internat has made software companies so ****ing sloppy they never care to bring out a working game since they know they can patch it eventually
Aggie: that is true
MasterZen: console games are usually never even remotely as buggy
MasterZen: why? because there is no way to patch them. Companies have to get the game out as close to perfect as possible or else no one will buy them
Aggie: they aren't and with memory card you can have long games. "romance of the three kingdoms " on the old nintendo still ranks as one of the best games IMHP
MasterZen: I played Nobunaga's Ambition, same style
Aggie: i liked that too
MasterZen: Nintendo games were awsome. I stay play the ROMs
Aggie: the emulators on the pc also work well with those games
MasterZen: something like PTW would have never happened in a console game
Aggie: nope
vondrack: hmmm... I can't really participate in a discussion about consoles - never had any...
MasterZen: you had no childhood vondrack :P
Aggie: well i only have the nintnedo, i played the other through mu nephews,neices
vondrack: I had... one with Sinclair ZX SPectrum
Aggie: i has the atari 2600
MasterZen: I had the old Atari 2600, nintendo, and super nintendo
MasterZen: then came Civilization I and I said **** consoles :P
vondrack: Ataris were quite rare here
vondrack: Sinclairs ruled this country
vondrack: and various clones of that machine
vondrack: anyway... do we have any agenda today?
vondrack: anything interesting happened since last week?
Aggie: unfortunately with the game stalled there not much to do
vondrack: did GS attack?
Aggie: nope we convinced them to do a 1 turn cease fire, so now we have yellowknife to pop 7 witrh musk
vondrack: hehe
vondrack: cool
vondrack: and Alamo was not attacked either?
Aggie: they say they are about to send us a contract for war with nd.
Aggie: nope
vondrack: hmmm... a contract...
Aggie: well we won't agree, i actually feel a liitle guilty leading them on.
vondrack: understood
vondrack: I felt the same way after that rogue chat last weeks
Aggie: iwas wondering about us three makinga joint declaration that we will not stop until GS is off BOB
vondrack: last week
vondrack: I am not sure whether such a declaration would help things
vondrack: GS would feel even more taregtted
vondrack: possibly more players quitting
Aggie: ok
vondrack: because of a "conspiracy against GS"
Aggie: ok
vondrack: btw - I kept the captured worker
Aggie: thats fine
vondrack: noticed he was ND
Aggie: , think of him as payment
vondrack: so he will work as fast with us as would with you
vondrack: hehe
vondrack: no
vondrack: I will use him to whatever you need
vondrack: and when the time comes and we need to break deals again
Aggie: thats sounds good
vondrack: you just take him back
vondrack: any urgent tasks ATM?
vondrack: I was thinking about "widening" the road in the west-:[/b]east direction
vondrack: so that units do not block each other
Aggie: that would help
vondrack: k, we will start working on that
Aggie: we did that when we got aligned with nd at the begining. It helps movement alot
vondrack: yeah, I can imagine that
vondrack: if not for the traffic jam, LEF would already be gathered S of Skulgaria
Aggie: right
Aggie: , well next turn(assuming a next turn)
Aggie: maybe trip and gramphos can clear the bugs up
vondrack: :crosses fingers:
vondrack: alright... if we have nothing else today, I will go to bed - I feel terribly tired (tough business day today)
Aggie: that fine, i have to so some meeting in RL today myself
vondrack: give my best regards to Darekill and/or Zayxus, if they show up
vondrack: ok, see you in a week
Aggie: 60mi each way
Aggie: see you
vondrack: take care
vondrack: bye, MZ!
vondrack: bye, Aggie!
Session Close: Thu Nov 20 21:22:57 2003

vondrack is offline vondrack

Emperor
Praha, Czech Republic
Jan 2002
time: 06:30
  Old Post 26-11-2003 00:46
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#83 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton or Terrorists Win

A PM from Aggie:

quote:
Thanks for the Lux, now Imperial city can go full throttle.

Here is a picture of the situation in the east so you can best plan your movement.


If the ROP is working fine(by the way it didn't show uo in the diplomacy box) then I'd sugest you move e,ne,ne then e onto forest(but exposed to attack or ne to attack GS if they move northward.

If the ROP isn't working I'd move s,e,e onto the hill s,sw of Yellowknife. From there you could come up from the south and trap GS.

Of course even without the ROP you might want to take the north route, it totally up to you. As you see, GS is facing superior forces. Unortho is currently getting the wording to send GS, but it is safe to say we rejected their offer.

If you have any questions or ideas just sent me a PM.
Best wishes
Patrick

vondrack is offline vondrack

Emperor
Praha, Czech Republic
Jan 2002
time: 06:30
  Old Post 26-11-2003 00:50
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#84 Report this post to a moderator
Get a bigger avatar today!

Here is what I suggest:

This turn, we move all our knights S-E-SE (safe, RoP or no RoP). This way, GS will still not see us (unless they have some scouts along the coast - but even if they spot us, we will be out of their reach)... on the next turn, we move E-E (and perhaps E-SE, too), gaining control of the best landing point(s) for potential GS reinforcements. The turn after, we seize as many hill/mountain landing points along the coast as possible. This will leave the GS stack cut from reinforcements - plus, it should be quite a shock for them, because I do not think they'd expect us from that direction.

My gut feeling is that they will either stay sitting on that hill or attack Y'knife. Moving NE-N, they would either have to expose the whole stack in the open for a turn, or leave their pike cover behind - in both cases, GoW riders would cut them to pieces.

If they attack Y'knife, they will crush their skulls against the defenses. And if they stay and leave the coast S of them uncovered, they will lose it to our troops (and will have to attack them in order to regain the position - helping us with a happiness boost and weakening their attack forces, as our knights will be defense 4.8/6.3 on hill/mountains... leaving the surviving units pretty much harmless as far as an attack on GoW/ND cities would be concerned.

What do you think?

The only weak point is if they have the landing points covered... but I still believe that going South, pulling a trap is better then messing through the rough terrain in the North.

redstar1 is offline redstar1
Prince
Belfast, Northern Ireland
Apr 2001
time: 05:30
  Old Post 26-11-2003 01:14
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#85 Report this post to a moderator
Tired of ads?

I beleive thats a good assessment of what we should do. They are not expecting us, they are also not expecting any forces to arrive from the South, therefore I beleive that is our best option.

ZargonX is offline ZargonX
Emperor
Space
Sep 2002
time: 00:30
  Old Post 26-11-2003 01:25
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#86 Report this post to a moderator
Suffering from ads?

I would also support the southern option. Leaves us with the most maneuverability in regards to whatever they may do.

Tiberius is offline Tiberius

Emperor
Europe
Jan 2000
time: 06:30
  Old Post 26-11-2003 02:52
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#87 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization: The Boardgame

Yes, the southern route is better. The N is pretty well covered by GoW anyway. Moving S leaves us more flexibility in dealing with whatever will happen in the following turns, while not exposing our troops to an immediate danger (also hiding them for one more turn).

The only problem is that moving S-E-SE leaves GS's troops out of our reach for the next turn, should it be necessarry to intervene.

I have a feeling that GS will stay there until more troops will land there, or launch a massive attack in the south and this is only a decoy army for the GoW riders. What they don't know is that GoW can count on our 9 knights, and won't withdraw so many riders from the S.

vondrack is offline vondrack

Emperor
Praha, Czech Republic
Jan 2002
time: 06:30
  Old Post 26-11-2003 03:15
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#88 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy GURPS/ Alpha Centauri

I would expect reinforcements in our area (or total withdrawal) - Theseus mentioned once they were not trying to take the eastern part of GoW lands with just 12 knights and few pikes.

That's why I believe we should rush to block any reinforcements from entering the battlefield.

lmtoops is offline lmtoops
King
Dallas, Texas
Mar 2002
time: 23:30
  Old Post 26-11-2003 03:33
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#89 Report this post to a moderator
Increase Your PM Length

I agree to the plan as stated by Vondrack.

If they don't see it coming, that would be great.

Leo

vondrack is offline vondrack

Emperor
Praha, Czech Republic
Jan 2002
time: 06:30
  Old Post 26-11-2003 04:04
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#90 Report this post to a moderator
Browse Apolyton AD-FREE

Alright, seems we agree on the plan internally. PMing Aggie:

quote:
Hi, Aggie!

I am looking at the picture of the battlefield you sent me and... the way I see it, you are safe with Y'knife - the defenses are formidable. Port Isolation is out of GS reach at least for a turn. I believe the most important thing now is to prevent GS from reinforcing.

So, what about this:

This turn, we move all our knights S-E-SE (safe, RoP or no RoP). This way, GS will still not see us (unless they have some scouts along the coast - but even if they spot us, we will be out of their reach)... on the next turn, we move E-E (and perhaps E-SE, too), gaining control of the best landing point(s) for potential GS reinforcements. The turn after, we seize as many hill/mountain landing points along the coast as possible. This will leave the GS stack cut from reinforcements - plus, it should be quite a shock for them, because I do not think they'd expect us from that direction.

My gut feeling is that they will either stay sitting on that hill or attack Y'knife. Moving NE-N, they would either have to expose the whole stack in the open for a turn, or leave their pike cover behind - in both cases, your riders would cut them to pieces.

If they attack Y'knife, they will crush their skulls against the defenses. And if they stay and leave the coast S of them uncovered, they will lose it to our troops (and will have to attack them in order to regain the position - helping us with a happiness boost and weakening their attack forces, as our knights will be defense 4.8/6.3 on hill/mountains... leaving the surviving units pretty much harmless as far as an attack on your cities would be concerned).

What do you think?

 
Pages (5): [ 1   2   3   4   5   ]
< Last Thread     Next Thread > Post New Thread     Post A Reply
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:30.
Apolyton Time is 00:30.
    top of page
Rate This Thread:
Forum Jump:
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
 




Contact Us - Apolyton Civilization Site - Support Us!

Building a better Apolyton through better information. Click here and take our poll!
Non-US visitors, click here!

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.0.3
Copyright ©2000, 2001, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.

Page generated in 0.0762 seconds (93.44% PHP - 6.56% MySQL) with 31 queries
Page Loading Time:

Support Apolyton: Amazon USA | Amazon UK | Amazon DE | Amazon FR |
Support Apolyton and get FREE PLUS, Buy from Chips&Bits: Galactic Civilizations | Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition | Call to Power 2 | Civilization: The Boardgame | GURPS/ Alpha Centauri | Alpha Centauri | Civilization IV | Civilization III: Complete |


Front Page | Civilization IV | Civilization III | Civilization II | Call to Power II | Alpha Centauri | Master of Orion III
Rise of Nations | Galactic Civilizations | Galactic Civilizations II | Misc
Alt.Civs | Civ I | C:CtP I | About | News | Directory | Apolyton Store | Forums | Chat | Columns | Interviews | Newsletter
Scenario League | CSC | Clash of Civs | Spanish Site | CtP Maps | Cradle of Civ | WesW's Ctp1/2 Site | Civ3 Haven

apolyton.net | apolyton.com | civilization2.net | civilization3.net | civilization4.net | civilizationiv.info | calltopower.net | galciv.net | galciv2.net | moo3.net