 |
|
Eli
|
|
Israel
Jul 2000 time: 07:30
|
|
Arnold! Arnold!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
yavoon
|
|
whatever happened to runoffs? or is the population too apathetic to support going twice?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
yavoon
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Boris Godunov
So, in other words, it makes perfect sense for conservative California Republicans to vote for a socially liberal actor with no prior political experience who has yet to articulate a plan at all and who has surrounded himself in his campaign with prominent staunch Democrats like Buffett and Lowe?
That's ludicrous. Arnold doesn't stand for the values most Republicans believe in...he's ideologically identical to a lot of Democrats! Where does he differ in belief from Davis, even?
Even Riordan would be a more palatable choice for a conservative. What use is it voting the party line when the Republican in question isn't at all someone who shares your ideals or values? |
I smell liberal subterfuge. let the war begin!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MichaeltheGreat
|
|
Apolyton Grand Executioner
|
 |
mooning the house that Ruth built.
Oct 1999 time: 21:30
|
|
quote: Originally posted by DinoDoc
Because that's the best you're going to get and demanding ideaological purity is what got the California Republican Party in the state it is in today. |
You're too pragmatic to be a real conservative. 
Neither the state nor the national party's social conservative side wants to promote the idea that you need to accept and promote moderate candidates to gain seats. Think platform fights in the conventions, RNC infighting on which primary candidates to support, sending mixed signals to fundraisers, etc.
IMO, the general view in each national party (the DNC treats moderate and conservative Dems with even more contempt) is that their less ideologically pure members will still support one of their own party, rather than a more ideologically removed candidate from the opposite party, so the disenchanted will still remain within their respective party ranks.
From a more cynical, Macchiavellian point of view, the last thing you want in a California governor is an ideological moderate who isn't in step with either party's ideologues. A successful, popular governor of California is a huge factor in presidential primary considerations, if not as a candidate, as a power broker. From the Republican point of view, California is a very expensive state to campaign in (lots of expensive media markets, lots of travel, big staffs), and a liberal government that ****s up is worth a lot of ammo against Dems in other states. First we've got the energy debacle, then the budget, and now both the budget and the recall. The Republicans aren't hurting on the national level because California is dominated for the moment by Democrats. 
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:30. Apolyton Time is 00:30. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|