19-08-2003 04:43									#1
	Millions of jobs lost overseas- Is this a serious problem for the U.S.? Get a bigger avatar today!

It seems many tech jobs are going to Russia and India, including tech support. All they have to know how to do is speak english.

Is this a serious problem? Can we create more jobs to fill them? We created many jobs in the 90's that didn't exist before, can we do it again?

Because I see this as a serious problem. True, not all jobs can be shipped overseas. Many jobs require "hands" on work. But even white collar jobs such as accounting is being shipped overseas.

This got me concerned. Because if we reach a point where we have millions of people that can't find work, and need work to eat and live in their homes, we will have a problem. Yes we already have millions of people out of work, but they aren't starving to death...yet

Is it time to go to socialism? These fat cat business owners are getting rich sending american jobs overseas. They are making millions. Is it time they support the people they put out of work?

	19-08-2003 04:49									#2
	Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

Dissident, you jackass. Where have you been, a ****ing cave?
Hell yes, it is, and has been, a serious problem.

	19-08-2003 04:53									#3
	Support Apolyton or Terrorists Win

fault of the big multinationals... they'll do anything to get people who work for less money

	19-08-2003 04:54									#4
	Support Apolyton, buy Civilization: The Boardgame

quote: Originally posted by SlowwHand Dissident, you jackass. Where have you been, a ****ing cave? Hell yes, it is, and has been, a serious problem.

this hasen't been a problem until recently. We had record low unemployment rates in the 90's. We created millions of new jobs in the 90's.

All hail Bill Clinton!!

Okay he had little to do with it. Technology explosion is what fueled the 90's boom.

	19-08-2003 04:55									#5
	Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations

Hell even McDonald's is automating their burger making. Soon you won't even be able to fall back on jobs like McDonald's.

Not that it is a realist job to work at. I'd rather die than work there. No offense Albert Speer

	19-08-2003 04:59									#6
	Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations

Is there any country in the world that doesn't lose significant numbers of jobs to people overseas?

	19-08-2003 05:01									#7
	Browse Apolyton AD-FREE

India of course, or China

	19-08-2003 05:01									#8
	Got spare money?

Yes. The countries to which all these people are moving.

	19-08-2003 05:01									#9
	Help yourself to an AD-FREE life

quote: Originally posted by Dissident this hasen't been a problem until recently. We had record low unemployment rates in the 90's. We created millions of new jobs in the 90's. All hail Bill Clinton!! Okay he had little to do with it. Technology explosion is what fueled the 90's boom.

I suspect speculation based on inflated fraudulent corporate earnings statements was also a huge factor in the boom.

	19-08-2003 05:02									#10
	Put an end to popups!

I've even heard that there's a program for some companies to bring workers from other countries here to the US to work, but can still pay them the pittance they would receive back in their home country. So they've made the labor local, but retained the Third-world costs. F*ckers.

	19-08-2003 05:06									#11
	Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

not as big a problem as it would first seem. more a problem for smaller countries than the US. since its pointless to take all our jobs away as then u couldn't sell things to us.

imagine if america stopped consuming? the economic world would implode.

	19-08-2003 05:06									#12
	Inflate your Upload Space

No, it isn't a serious problem. It is a sign of more efficient jobs (your tech jobs in the 90s) predominating in the US. There will, of course, be growing pains through the process, but the US will get more efficient.

Skilled jobs go to where the productivity is. As long as the US is productive, we'll always have work.

I guess the 'serious problem' is that Indian workers are getting more and more productive and will be an economic superpower in the next 50 years.

	19-08-2003 05:09									#13
	Support Apolyton, buy Call to Power 2

Health club equipment doesn't clean itself...my job is secure. Once I get my degree in Architecture...well, we'll see...

The only way to combat shipping USAmerican jobs overseas is either to give much stronger incentives to keep them here like tax breaks and grants or threaten stronger penalties for not complying to certain standards in the workplace. Sweatshops, child-labor, and slavery won't disappear overnight in places like India so the incentive is to stay in the US were the good conditions are already in place.

Won't happen anytime soon because politicians enjoy being g*ngb*ng*d by large corporate donors too much.

	19-08-2003 05:11									#14
	Tired of ads?

It is a very serious and unprecedented problem.

It is becoming less and less possible to make a good living in America using one's skills or one's labor. The only way to make a good living in the USA now is with existing money; the so-called "investor class".

This destroys the way the USA works because now people have no incentive to immigrate to the country.

The problem will partially correct itself though, as wages in the USA for a given quantity of work equalize with that elsewhere in the world. Then jobs stop leaving. But that does not solve the inequality problem.

	19-08-2003 05:12									#15
	Support Apolyton, buy Call to Power 2

quote: Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui No, it isn't a serious problem. It is a sign of more efficient jobs (your tech jobs in the 90s) predominating in the US. There will, of course, be growing pains through the process, but the US will get more efficient. Skilled jobs go to where the productivity is. As long as the US is productive, we'll always have work. I guess the 'serious problem' is that Indian workers are getting more and more productive and will be an economic superpower in the next 50 years.

yes but as long as u dont pay the Indians anything they have to sell their goods to americans. and if u actually pay them then they wont have that ridiculous competitive advantage.

	19-08-2003 05:13									#16
	Tired of ads?

quote: Originally posted by Smiley It is a very serious and unprecedented problem. It is becoming less and less possible to make a good living in America using one's skills or one's labor. The only way to make a good living in the USA now is with existing money; the so-called "investor class". This destroys the way the USA works because now people have no incentive to immigrate to the country. The problem will partially correct itself though, as wages in the USA for a given quantity of work equalize with that elsewhere in the world. Then jobs stop leaving. But that does not solve the inequality problem.

have u noticed a drop in immigration? I haven't.

	19-08-2003 05:14									#17
	Got spare money?

quote: yes but as long as u dont pay the Indians anything they have to sell their goods to americans. and if u actually pay them then they wont have that ridiculous competitive advantage.

This is true... but they are paying the Indians, and as the years go by, you will have to pay them more and more . They already have the most in demand, best engineers in the world, I can believe that other jobs will follow.

	19-08-2003 05:16									#18
	Browse Apolyton AD-FREE

quote: Originally posted by Trajanus fault of the big multinationals... they'll do anything to get people who work for less money

That's like faulting union members who will do anything to get people to work for more money. Both are just prosueing their natural self interest.

The big problem is when one side holds all of the cards and either the wages get set so high it is unreasonable or the free flow of goods is such that there is no way to fight the competetion.

	19-08-2003 05:16									#19
	Get a bigger avatar today!

quote: Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui quote: yes but as long as u dont pay the Indians anything they have to sell their goods to americans. and if u actually pay them then they wont have that ridiculous competitive advantage. This is true... but they are paying the Indians, and as the years go by, you will have to pay them more and more . They already have the most in demand, best engineers in the world, I can believe that other jobs will follow.

true. India is a scary place. it produces great quantities of doctors/engineers and the like. and great quantities of piss poor labor. its a real dicotomy, an economic giant ready to explode. but can it maintain this obscene disparity forever? when will it have to switch and how much friction is in the switching. and when they do switch they'll be over a billion more consumers in the world for everyone to sell their crap to. since right now the indians and americans both sell to the americans.

	19-08-2003 05:25									#20
	Browse Apolyton AD-FREE

No, immigration as a whole has gone up... but not all immigration is the same kind of immigration. Much of immigration these days are people coming from other countries seeking low pay labor, and not so many are highly skilled workers.

	19-08-2003 05:45									#21
	Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition

Well, hasn't that pretty much always been the case? I mean, I don't remember the large majority of people coming in during the 1800s and 1900s being young, fresh-out-of-college go-getters.

	19-08-2003 06:21									#22
	Help yourself to an AD-FREE life

quote: Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui No, it isn't a serious problem. It is a sign of more efficient jobs (your tech jobs in the 90s) predominating in the US. There will, of course, be growing pains through the process, but the US will get more efficient. Skilled jobs go to where the productivity is. As long as the US is productive, we'll always have work.

Wrong. This is a serious problem. US productivity is going up - but productivity means each individual does/can do more. If the productivity of the average worker increases while the overall amount of work to be done remains the same, then you have the conditions for long-term unemployment problems.

We may always have work, but may not have enough for the majority of our citizens to make a decent living (i.e. a living wage - not the $6/hr the video store guy makes here in Manhattan).

quote: I guess the 'serious problem' is that Indian workers are getting more and more productive and will be an economic superpower in the next 50 years.

The Indians likely see this in positive terms.

	19-08-2003 06:29									#23
	Enter the AD-FREE zone

quote: US productivity is going up - but productivity means each individual does/can do more. If the productivity of the average worker increases while the overall amount of work to be done remains the same, then you have the conditions for long-term unemployment problems.

This assumes that the amount of 'work' is remaining the same. It's not. When manufacturing jobs left, they were replaced by technology jobs, which more than made up for the loss. Tech jobs are more productive work than manufacturing.

Tell me why didn't the US have unemployment 'problems' in the 80s and 90s when manufacturing jobs were moving overseas? Hell, we STILL don't have unemployment problems. There are many countries that'd kill for a sub 6.5% unemployment.

quote: We may always have work, but may not have enough for the majority of our citizens to make a decent living

Why? Has capitalism suddenly stopped all of a sudden? Has technology reached the end of its niche? People were claiming 'chicken little' like, back in the 70s, that new technology would lead to greater unemployment because of automation. It hasn't happened.

	19-08-2003 06:32									#24
	Support Apolyton, buy Civilization: The Boardgame

This idea that everyone, including zit faced teenagers, needs to make $10 per hour and have full health, dental, and retirement benifets is just plain stupid. If we keep pushing up the minium wage and increasing the costs for businesses then we will only increase the rate at which jobs flee the country. Do you really want that?

You want to increase people's wages in a sustainable way? Improve the business climate so that businesses make greater profits, can hired and fire workers without market distorting government regulations interfering, and then sit back and watch the job base (and tax base) grow.

	19-08-2003 06:48									#25
	Support Apolyton, buy Call to Power 2

quote: Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui This assumes that the amount of 'work' is remaining the same. It's not.

That's right. The amount of work is decreasing. Hence all the talk of "idle capacity" lately.

quote: When manufacturing jobs left, they were replaced by technology jobs, which more than made up for the loss. Tech jobs are more productive work than manufacturing.

But Bob the welder cannot just go be Bob the computer technician or programmer. So even if more technology jobs come into being, there is a question of who this benefits. Many members of the middle class were squeezed out of the middle class during the 80s with the loss of manufacturing jobs. These former manufacturers had to go find new jobs without having any new skills. So when you say "made up for the loss" my question is to whom was this loss made up?

But many of those new tech jobs disappeared along with the tech bubble. So many of those techies are now working in low wage service jobs or unemployed.

quote: Tell me why didn't the US have unemployment 'problems' in the 80s and 90s when manufacturing jobs were moving overseas? Hell, we STILL don't have unemployment problems. There are many countries that'd kill for a sub 6.5% unemployment.

The US did have unemployment problems in the 80s and early 90s.

quote: Why? Has capitalism suddenly stopped all of a sudden? Has technology reached the end of its niche? People were claiming 'chicken little' like, back in the 70s, that new technology would lead to greater unemployment because of automation. It hasn't happened.

automation creates new jobs while destroying old. Yes this is inevitable, but how about programs to retrain displaced workers? The problem now, though, is that these jobs have left for China. Now, tech jobs are headed for India and China as well.

	19-08-2003 06:57									#26
	Re: Millions of jobs lost overseas- Is this a serious problem for the U.S.? Get a bigger avatar today!

quote: Originally posted by Dissident It seems many tech jobs are going to Russia and India, including tech support. All they have to know how to do is speak english. Is this a serious problem?

Jobs going to Russia: not a problem at all

Jobs going to India: this is really a serious problem

	19-08-2003 06:58									#27
	Support Apolyton, buy Alpha Centauri

quote: This idea that everyone, including zit faced teenagers, needs to make $10 per hour and have full health, dental, and retirement benifets is just plain stupid. If we keep pushing up the minium wage and increasing the costs for businesses then we will only increase the rate at which jobs flee the country. Do you really want that? You want to increase people's wages in a sustainable way? Improve the business climate so that businesses make greater profits, can hired and fire workers without market distorting government regulations interfering, and then sit back and watch the job base (and tax base) grow.

On the first paragraph, I agree.

On the second, I agree to a point depending on what you mean... if you mean that minimum wage should be abolished altogether, I disagree.

We've done the no-minimum wage thing before and the results were horrendous. A world without minimum wage only works in which there are always other oppurtunities for workers, and that is not always the case. I've heard lots of talk at the Foundation for Enterprise about eliminating the minimum wage altogether, but that's all on paper they don't ever think about what happens when growth plateaus... and it, of course, does and must plateau eventually.

On the reverse side, Brazil has a *proportionally* higher minimum wage than the United States, but yet the people are so much poorer... the main reason is because the law is not in anyway enforced, so it doesn't do much good to just keep increasing the minimum wage since all it does is compel people to circumvent the law... of course, here there is a lot more enforcement, but at the same time, there are still plenty of chicanos and Guatemalans that aren't working for more than minimum wage, and it's unlikely their situation will ever improve.

	19-08-2003 07:02									#28
	Put an end to popups!

quote: Originally posted by Oerdin This idea that everyone, including zit faced teenagers, needs to make $10 per hour and have full health, dental, and retirement benifets is just plain stupid.

How about unskilled adults?

quote: If we keep pushing up the minium wage and increasing the costs for businesses then we will only increase the rate at which jobs flee the country. Do you really want that? You want to increase people's wages in a sustainable way? Improve the business climate so that businesses make greater profits, can hired and fire workers without market distorting government regulations interfering, and then sit back and watch the job base (and tax base) grow.

You are joking, right? Yes, business growth leads to the preconditions for increasing the job base and salaries, but that is no guarantee that the wealth created by this growth will be used to increase wages or hire more people. I'll buy this if and only if you have some idea on how we may be assured that the wealth will indeed trickle down. (I won't even get into your proposals for decreasing job security.)

As for "market distorting government regulations" ...

Let's talk about the biggest "market distorting regulation" there is - all the laws limiting unions. For instance, right to work laws deny unions the freedom to contract for closed shops. How about the ban on secondary boycotts? That denies unions the freedom to contract for a shop that only deals with union shops. how about these infringements on the market? How about we allow workers to use unions to create parity of bargaining power with employers.

Actually, unions provide the perfect medium through which to make sure that the wealth created by growth does in fact make its way to the employees (who in turn buy more stuff, which in turn creates more business ...)

If we are going to get rid of those "market distorting government regulations" let's get rid of all of them - not just the ones businessmen don't want.

	19-08-2003 07:09									#29
	Support Apolyton or Terrorists Win

quote: That's right. The amount of work is decreasing. Hence all the talk of "idle capacity" lately.

So what happens during an economic slow down is indictative of future normal economic times?

quote: But Bob the welder cannot just go be Bob the computer technician or programmer. So even if more technology jobs come into being, there is a question of who this benefits. Many members of the middle class were squeezed out of the middle class during the 80s with the loss of manufacturing jobs. These former manufacturers had to go find new jobs without having any new skills. So when you say "made up for the loss" my question is to whom was this loss made up?

Of course they will have to retrain. However, during the 80s and 90s, GDP went up by great amounts, so yes this loss was made up. People lose manufacturing jobs, and maybe they went into other fields, but many more new technology based jobs and other jobs opened up in the economy. Hey, maybe it didn't work out so well for the factory worker, but people in general did well.

quote: But many of those new tech jobs disappeared along with the tech bubble. So many of those techies are now working in low wage service jobs or unemployed.

And they'll get new high paying jobs in the next boom period.

quote: The US did have unemployment problems in the 80s and early 90s.

What, we hit 6% unemployment? That isn't an unemployment problem. An unemployment problem is when we hit 10% (which wouldn't be a problem in Europe, interestingly)

quote: The problem now, though, is that these jobs have left for China. Now, tech jobs are headed for India and China as well.

And different jobs will come up to take their place, and the cycle continues.

It's funny when these manufacturing jobs were leaving in the 80s, there was talk that we were FINISHED! The Japanese would be the next economic superpower and we better get used to it. Then come the 90s, which was one of the most profitable decades in US history and we hit a bump and suddenly there is talk we are finished again, and the Indians are taking all our jobs.

I guess I can count on this discussion again (with another country as the new job taker) in 15 years!

	19-08-2003 07:12									#30
	Inflate your Upload Space

You are seriously claiming that Unions not having a natural right to exclude any and all persons who don't pay them membership dues is what is distorting the market? So by allowing unions to exclude all of there competetion we are creating a better market? Monoplies create perfect markets?

If you are arguing this then I don't see any reason discuing this with you because such a claim is clearly assinine.