 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Japher
|
 |
Ook! Ook! Ack! Ack! Ack!
Jun 2002 time: 05:30
|
|
quote: San Francisco (Looks like loosing Mooch won't be that bad ) |
Even though I am a Niner fan, I wouldn't jump to conclusions so fast... It was the Bears! This weekend will be their true test, especially if Warner doesn't play, and I am hoping he does.
quote: Minnesota (Imagine if Moss played hard on EVERY play )
|
For some reason Minnesota has Favre's number. They beat 'em last year, when Favre was playing like crap, and so what they did it again... I'd wait on them to.
quote: Buffalo (Amazing performance) |
Three Words: I Love Blodesoe... Can't believe the Pats ditched him, only to have him come back and tromp all over them
quote: Miami (obviously... what a joke)
|
No idea what happened. Yeah, Texans!
Definite ouch... Why the replace almost their entire O-line is beyond me.
To leave the Rams out is weak... Without the receivers they use to have theya re going to be bad. Warner out within at least the next two weeks, with Bulger in it will all come down on Faulk, who was hurt last year too. If Faulk goes out? Canidate is gone...
However, I must agree with your predictions... Niners or Seattle? Might it come down to the last game on Dec. 27th?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Imran Siddiqui

|
 |
The Potterverse
Jan 1970 time: 00:30
|
|
quote: Even though I am a Niner fan, I wouldn't jump to conclusions so fast... It was the Bears! |
Well, people were saying hiring Erickson was a bad move, etc., etc. This game, even though it WAS against the Bears showed that San Fran is just fine on offense without Mooch.
quote: For some reason Minnesota has Favre's number. |
I was mostly talking about how good Culpepper and Moss looked. Moe Williams ran the ball efficiently as well.
quote: To leave the Rams out is weak... Without the receivers they use to have theya re going to be bad. Warner out within at least the next two weeks, with Bulger in it will all come down on Faulk, who was hurt last year too. If Faulk goes out? |
No, I don't think it is weak. Why? Because the team may respond to Bulger as it did last year (6 straight wins). With Bulger in there is no way it'll all come down to Faulk ... Bulger was a great QB last year and with Warner looking very messed up, he can easily turn the team around.
AND, besides, even though they sucked, they didn't look that much worse than predicted (I've seen them be predicted all over the place).
|
|
|  |
 |
|
reismark
|
 |
Paragon of Virtue
Jan 1970 time: 00:30
|
|
quote: The exceptions are Jurivicus and Brad Johnson. |
Good god... you forgot McCardell, the entire O-line (Oben & Whittle in particular), Spires, Booger, Brooks, Quarles, and the entire secondary. Again, Sapp & Key are the exception, not the rule. Typical smack talk from someone who's biased and doesn't know better. 
quote: Even though I am a Niner fan, I wouldn't jump to conclusions so fast... It was the Bears! This weekend will be their true test, especially if Warner doesn't play, and I am hoping he does. |
ITA - let's see San Francisco do that against a *good* team (sorry, Ming/rah, but it's the harsh truth) before we go lauding the praise on them. They really don't have a sure litmus test until they play the Bucs in Week 7 - and St. Louis & Seattle don't count yet.
quote: Fearless predictions (based on week 1)! |
Might as well throw mine in...
AFC: Buffalo v. Tennessee
NFC: Tampa Bay v. N.Y. Giants
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Zopperoni
|
|
Those predictions are not crazy enough:
AFC Ch'ship: CIN vs HOU
NFC Ch'ship: ARI vs DET
Seriously:
AFC Ch'ship: PIT vs TEN
NFC Ch'ship: PHI vs TB
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Imran Siddiqui

|
 |
The Potterverse
Jan 1970 time: 00:30
|
|
Just heard something interesting on ESPN. Apparently the last two Superbowl winners (TB and NE) LOST their first game. So look at the losers to see who'll go this year ... maybe that is what Miami was thinking.
--
I'm board, so I'm going to have some fun.
Superbowl winners (off the top of my head). Years refer to the regular season.
66: Green Bay
67: Green Bay
68: NY Jets
69: Kansas City
70: Baltimore (Colts)
71: Dallas (?)
72: Miami
73: Miami
74: Pittsburgh
75: Pittsburgh
76: Dallas
77: Oakland
78: Pittsburgh
79: Pittsburgh
80: Oakland
81: San Francisco
82: Washington
83: Los Angeles (Raiders)
84: San Francisco
85: Chicago
86: NY Giants
87: Washington
88: San Francisco
89: San Francisco
90: NY Giants
91: Washington
92: Dallas
93: Dallas
94: San Francisco
95: Dallas
96: Green Bay
97: Denver
98: Denver
99: St. Louis
00: Baltimore
01: New England
02: Tampa Bay
All Decade Skill Position Teams (since the 70s):
The 70s
QB: Roger Staubach, Dal
RB: O.J. Simpson, Buf
FB: Franco Harris, Pit
WR: Lynn Swann, Pit
WR: Steve Largent, Sea
TE: .... I dunno (who included TE anyway ).
The 80s
QB: Joe Montana, SF (Duh! )
RB: Marcus Allen, Oak (when Al Davis wasn't trying to mess his career up)
FB: John Riggins, Was
WR: Jerry Rice, SF
WR: Art Monk, Was
TE: Kellen Winslow, SD
The 90s
QB: Brett Farve, GB
RB: Emmitt Smith, Dal
FB: Tom Rathman, SF
WR: Jerry Rice, SF
WR: Michael Irvin, Dal
TE: Shannon Sharpe, Den
(Btw, Bronco fans, Elway and Davis just missed out)
The '00s
QB: Peyton Manning, Ind
RB: Marshal Faulk, Stl
FB: Mike Alstott, TB
WR: Marvin Harrison, Ind
WR: Randy Moss, Min (sorry T.O.)
TE: Tony Gonzales, KC
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:30. Apolyton Time is 00:30. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|