 |
|  |
 |
|
SnowFire
|
 |
New York City, NY
Jan 1970 time: 00:30
|
|
This isn't what you want to hear, probably, but the best thing to do is play with a better, patient player. Play casually, where you cheerfully discuss the best moves for both sides, and allow take backs after you hang your queen or something. Listen to why the good player says that your suggested moves for him are faulty, or the obvious threat of his that you're missing when thinking out loud for your position.
That, and good chess books. Unfortunately, the best one I read was printed in 1953 or thereabouts and would be practically impossible to find.
As a disclaimer, despite all that, I'm still not that wonderful. In general, I won't make moves that hang a piece within 2 moves, and I comprehend enough basic strategy and positional ideas that barring no good moves on the other person's side (or blunders on my own), I can generally take games to a King & Pawn ending by forcing enough trades (and hope that I've developed my pawns better than my opponent).
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
MJW
|
|
MN,USA
Jul 2002 time: 23:30
|
|
Show me one of you games.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jac de Molay
|
 |
Detroit
Sep 2001 time: 05:30
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Urban Ranger
You need to look deeper. Come up with combinations that net you either material, tempo, or position. Preferably all 3. I am not sure how easy that is, though.  |
Well, I 'm improving a little bit now. I picked up a chess for idiots book, and understanding material advantage has helped my game a little bit. I've won some games on Yahoo beginners now. But, I'm like Dissident, and it's hard to "see" more than two turns ahead.
quote: Best play against a chess program.
Chessmaster is very good.
|
Actually, just picked up a Chess program (Chessmate 2000?) from the bargain bin, and I'm very glad I did because I can play turns as long as I want. Played games all night saturday, and was able to beat 1100 and 1200 players.
A great game, but, damn, very very tough. 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Sir Ralph
|
 |
Long live teh Schwampel!
Dec 2001 time: 06:30
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Jac de Molay
Well, I 'm improving a little bit now. I picked up a chess for idiots book, and understanding material advantage has helped my game a little bit. I've won some games on Yahoo beginners now. But, I'm like Dissident, and it's hard to "see" more than two turns ahead.
Actually, just picked up a Chess program (Chessmate 2000?) from the bargain bin, and I'm very glad I did because I can play turns as long as I want. Played games all night saturday, and was able to beat 1100 and 1200 players.
A great game, but, damn, very very tough. |
Why would anyone pay a cent for a chess program, if there's Winboard (or Xboard, for that matter) with some terrific chess engines (GnuChess 5, Crafty 19) available for free? I bet alone Crafty is better than every game from the bargain bin and at least on even with $50 commercial games.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
DaShi
|
 |
The Taste of Japan
Sep 2000 time: 05:30
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Harry Seldon
Sometimes seeing ahead is a disadvantage. I assume people play like me but unfortunately not too many people are as wreckless and grandiose as I am. I'll anticipate this string of activity and suddenly on the very next turn I get checkmated. |
That's not what is meant by looking ahead. Yes, you try to anticipate your opponent's moves (and if you know them well enough, you can try a strategy based on that), but you need to look at all their available moves. One good technique is to look at it from their perspective. Try to see how they could penetrate your defenses, and see where their defenses are weakest.
Anyway, the best way to learn is to play as much as you can. I was so young when I started that I barely remember those days. However, I had a friend who wanted to learn to play. I was well above him at this time, but I offered to play him over and over again. He lost nearly every game, but he got better each time.
As you play you'll learn the nuasances of the game. You'll be able to push your opponent back with even taking any pieces, In fact, if you get good, you needn't worry what your opponent is doing, because you'll be controlling them.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Sir Ralph
|
 |
Long live teh Schwampel!
Dec 2001 time: 06:30
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Urban Ranger
Yeah. Lost a few times to the Fool's Mate before I realised I better put that knight up. |
The shortest game I ever won was a 3-turner at a simultaneous seance I gave at a local summer festival in a little town in northern Germany. One of my challengers was a drunkard, who already had downed quite some beers. He sat down and said "Hey, but wizzout dirty tricks, okeee?"
I had granted everyone the right to choose the color, and he begun:
1. f4
Oh, the Bird opening, I thought. Seems to be a good player. But screw it, I counter with From's gambit
1. ... e5
He thought a while, and played
2. g3??
No, definitely not a good player, I thought. I quickly captured the pawn
2. ... exf4
He looked at the board for a moment and then recaptured it
3. gxf4??
and here the game ended
3. ... Qh4 checkmate.
He looked at me and shouted "Goddamn! Hey... chessman... I said wizzzzzzout dirty tricks... no dirty tricks I said."
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:30. Apolyton Time is 00:30. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|