 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Zero
I think the original question was "Why do human beings consider themselves more important than other species?" |
Stupidity.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
centrifuge
|
|
Humans may have better ability to reason and use tools (which let's be honest isn't always a benefit), but does that mean that we are more advanced than other species? I personally don't think so. It really is a matter of Darwinism, species have adapted to their specific needs.
We are more advanced thinkers, Dolphins are more advanced swimmers, chameleons are more advanced hiders etc.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Boris Godunov
|
 |
Portland, OR
Aug 2001 time: 00:31
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Buck Birdseed
Conciousness, a quality no other species on earth has. |
Prove that, please.
As to the original question, I think it ties in with the erroneous notion that there is somehow a direction of evolution and that we are the evolutionary pinnacle, so to speak, of the current world.
This is not true in an absolute sense, of course, since evolution has no direction nor any intended goal.
It's a purely subjective value we place on our species. In our current environment, we're king **** of **** mountain. That could change, however, and we could end up going the way of the dodo.
I'd like to suggest that all species have an ingrained sense of speciesism, so it's probably a mindset that is somewhat evolutionary in its origin. Keeping to one's own kind is a valuable trait for survival in nature, so an inbred notion of your own species being superior to all others could be of benefit.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Starchild
|
 |
a raving alcoholic drama queen with a penchant for the biosciences
Jan 1970 time: 00:31
|
|
quote: Originally posted by centrifuge
Humans may have better ability to reason and use tools (which let's be honest isn't always a benefit), but does that mean that we are more advanced than other species? I personally don't think so. It really is a matter of Darwinism, species have adapted to their specific needs.
We are more advanced thinkers, Dolphins are more advanced swimmers, chameleons are more advanced hiders etc. |
But advanced thinking is the trump card. With that, you can top all the others. Yeah, dolphins swim better in their natural state. So we think of ways to swim better and now our submarines, cruise ships, and deep-sea crafts go faster, deeper, and for longer than any dolphin. Birds fly better naturally, so we think of ways to fly better and now we fly higher and faster than any bird.
We're the only species to ever get from planet Earth into space and in the long term, that's the only thing that counts. Dolphins can swim and chameleons can hide but when the Big Mamma of Space Rocks eventually heads our way, we're the ones that can get off this planet of rapidly falling property values and somewhere safer.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
JohnT

|
 |
Capitalist
Mar 1999 time: 00:31
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Zero
So then value of life has hierachy based on intellectual capacity, ranking in the food chain, ability to create culture/civilization?
So does such hierachy exist within human lives as well? |
No, I'm saying that there are essentially two groups out there: humans and animals. Animals are able to do very many different things, from flying to making war to forming social organizations to working together to achieve a common goal to tool making and using, but only humans can do all of that. Our mastery and refinement of what every other animal has to offer makes us unique.
In answer to your second question, I would say yes. People who live within a civilization and curb their biological instincts for the betterment of society are
higher on the hierarchy than people who don't. Imho, it doesn't matter if the civilization is Aztecian, Chinese, Indian, Polynesian, Ghandian, Western... as long as you are building some sort of civilized society, you are defining yourself as not an animal.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Eli
|
|
Israel
Jul 2000 time: 07:31
|
|
The more you can destroy the more advanced you are. We're definetely #1 in that.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Zero
|
 |
Bouncing back and forth
Sep 2002 time: 00:31
|
|
Okay so after enough attempts to get some talking going, here what I thought of the question.
1. Humans think they are important well, because they're humans. All organism's show tendency to promote their genetic packages into the next generation of living things, so obviously considering the life of one that has genetic similaririty must be linked with this kind of behavior. This applies at any level (kingdom, phylum, genus species, race, families etc.)
2. Life DOES HAVE hierarchy. But this hierachy depends on process of evolution. Meaning, hierachy is not static and weighs intellectual capacity, rank of food chain, enviornment etc. But like I've said before, this raises a question about same law applying within the species. And I'm willing to accept that. Unfortunately I'm aware that this raises an issue of racism.
3. So to me, there isnt humans... then animals. We are part of the same group, but we are merely in a really high position in the hierarchy of life due to our current situation. I don't view humans as anything extra ordinary enough to give its own classification on life.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:31. Apolyton Time is 00:31. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|