 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Master Zen
|
 |
of naughty
Jan 2003 time: 23:31
|
|
One comment:
No offense here, but I think we tried to sound a bit overly friendly here:
quote:
[14:49] [MasterZen] or rather discuss it, perhaps tonight. BF and me are the only ones with any semblance of authority at this moment online
[14:50] [miccofl] fair enough
[14:51] [BigFree] I'd say tech or gold
[14:51] [MasterZen] yeah
[14:51] [BigFree] but tech wont be likely for while
[14:51] [BigFree] only so many research paths right now
[14:52] [miccofl] true, best to pursue the gold ammount at this time
[14:52] [BigFree] so gold will prolly be the ultimate answer
[14:52] [BigFree] how much?
[14:52] [BigFree] Im not sure
[14:52] [BigFree] maybe it would be best if you guys could make an offer
[14:53] [BigFree] but we are not isolationists
[14:53] [miccofl] I'll see what we can come up with
[14:53] [BigFree] and are willing to sell it
[14:53] [BigFree] Just between you and I, I think CGN will be our best trading partner
[14:53] [BigFree] if not for the fact of our availablities
[14:54] [BigFree] because we both maintain irc channels
[14:54] [miccofl] communication is the key to successful negotiations
[14:55] [BigFree] yep
[14:55] [BigFree] and quick repsonses also help
[14:55] [BigFree] at least not like a week in between
|
First of all, it is not a sure thing that we'd want to sell them our map yet so it is very premature to affirm that we will in the future, because should we decide not to, then they'll start to get pissed at us because we told them we would.
Trying to mask things with overt friendliness (like the "we are not isolationist" bit) will sound a bit odd, and any smart team will think that it's not our true intentions. We are very cynical when other teams try to woo us, so there's no reason to believe they wouldn't take us as hypocrits by saying these things.
In short, please don't overstep the tone of the chats as it might lead to undesireable consequences later on, and if someone is negotiating, please don't put things on the table that the negotiator hasn't agreed to. That's why we discuss things in our own ISDG room simultaneously.
Thanks.
Last edited by Master Zen on 26-09-2003 at 03:31
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Togas
|
 |
California
Jun 2002 time: 21:31
|
|
I'm in agreement on this.
While we COULD have as tactical advantage having their map, and not giving them ours, they will be jealous of us for doing so, and will eventually find the means to aquire the map from GWT or possibly GCA. Once they do, we lose whatever sale we could have made, and we also have already lost trust by withholding it.
Trading our WM to them, however, gives them quite an advantage over GWT who is currently mapping themselves. If we did trade maps, we should ask them not to sell our WM to GWT ... let them know that we want to sell it to them ourselves.
As for contacts, they'll have to buy contact with CFC. We need to set up a fair price. We won't sell contact with GCA, of course.
I'm in favor of a Republic sale. The price that has been negotiated is fine with me. Let's not try to squeeze them too hard here. We're looking for a long term trade partner, not a one-time trade advantage.
--Togas
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:31. Apolyton Time is 00:31. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|