 |
|  |
 |
|
chegitz guevara
|
 |
Ft. Lauderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Jun 2000 time: 00:31
|
|
A lot of liberals like to look back on the 90s like it was a Golden Age (though, compared to what we've had the past three years, it's unsderstandable). But were the 90s really all that great? It's not like we had 8 years of high growth and low unemployment. That was only towards the end, after the East Asian markets collapsed and money started flooding into the U.S. looking for a safe haven for investment.
For the first haf of the Clinton years, the job market was stagnant, wage growth was stagnant, things weren't all that great, though they were better than the Ford-Carter-Reagan-Bush years. Back in the 90s we were talking of a jobless recovery (as opposed to today's jobloss recovery).
But now the money's fled, the jobs are gone, unemployment's up, and it's feeling a lot like the 80s all over again.
Were the 90s a blip, and now we're back to normal? Or is this the blip?
Last edited by chegitz guevara on 08-10-2003 at 22:15
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
my family was extremely poor in the 80s (lived in a trailer, ate rice and beans, ect) (some of it was my younger sister who had a congenital heart defect)
we were fairly poor in the 90s (my mom made less than 22000 a year and my dad didn't work) but it was ok because of disability (I have 4 siblings, so it was still tight)
me and my siblings and mom are all doing ok right now (compared to the 80s), in that we all have disposable income (Well, my youngest brother does not because he is in college and my older sister does not because she ****s everything up)
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Sava
|
 |
GO GO GO!
Mar 2001 time: 23:31
|
|
At lot of things happened at the same time to create a good economic boom.
-Clinton's 1993 Budget and the subsequent balancing of the budget
-Rise of the Internet and consumer use
-technology boom... and demand for it
-low unemployment proving that jobs can be created despite raising top income bracket tax rates
-low petroleum prices... America relies on gas, when prices are reasonable, consumers have more money to spend on other things.
Despite the good economic times in the 90's, there were some negatives. Wealth became much more concentrated at the top. Consumer debt continued to rise well above the rate of inflation. Tuition for colleges continued to rise well above rate of inflation... as did health care costs. Minimum wage, although increase slightly by Clinton, remained stagnant compared to the rate of inflation.
IMO, in order to get out of this "jobless recovery", we need to restore upper income taxes to what they were before Bush, put money into job creating government programs (infrastructure, public works, education), institute national health care, put money back into Social Security (IIRC, a third of the Bush tax cut was enough to satisfy SS demands for 75 years). Once consumers have income and money to spend... they CAN SPEND IT. A $400 tax cut isn't going to do **** when people's property taxes, state taxes, health care costs, and tuition costs are rising. ANd they definitely won't spend more if they aren't working. These stupid supply side economic policies might work if this sluggish economy was at all a supply side problem. It's just a ruse to shift the tax burdern from the rich unto the middle and working classes.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:31. Apolyton Time is 00:31. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|