 |
|
Vesayen
|
|
<--American who mostly likes the U.S.
One thing that always pissed me off about U.S. history... Now its all in the past so it dosent really matter, but its always pissed me off when people have tried to call U.S. aggresion something other then what it was, immoral aggression.
Thoughts?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Vesayen
|
|
quote: Originally posted by JohnT
If countries and societies aren't allowed to expand, then how are they to develop in the first place? To expand, to grow is to fulfill a biological imperative that is felt from the bacteria on up - is it not then surprising that our societies behave like they're biological creations?
To deny the ability to grow, evolve, adapt, and yes, to die, is to invite stagnation and eventual disaster. As the same goes for species, so it goes for societies and civilizations. |
So its okay to kill native americans and steal their land, and the land of mexico and other colonial powers because we need breathing room to expand?
Who else said that? Oh yes, Hitler in Mien Kempf.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Comrade Tassadar
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ted Striker
man this topic is soo freshman in college trying to reconcile his new world view with his old one
let's talk about lesbians or something |
If the gay community is ever to grow, they need to kick out the evil straight people! Especially here in Utah.
-Tassadar
"Fabulous Destiny"
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Comrade Tassadar
|
|
quote: Originally posted by JohnT
Is it right to proselytize Islam in Utah? |
Yeah, but we speak of it as it is: Doing gods will.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Vesayen
|
|
quote: Originally posted by JohnT
Was it OK for humanity to originally expand from Africa to Asia, Europe, N. America etc? Was it OK for Ivan the Great to create Russia by invading Siberia? Was it OK for the Native Americans themselves to destroy other Native Americans for their own material gain?
Is it right for a mold to fight another mold for dominance? Is it right for African crocodiles to hoard dwindling water supplies from the wilderbeast? Is it immoral for ants to fight each other for prime living space? Is it immoral for trees to grow, blocking the lights of more fragile plants that desperately need it?
Is it right to proselytize Islam in Utah? Is it right to ask people to join the Democratic party, even if they're Greens? Is it right to even try to change somebody's opinion?
To complain about "Manifest Destiny" is to whine about a specific example of something that happens to all things. Life... systems... organizations... all try to grow and they will attempt to do so at the expense of the other.
Such is the world we evolved from. Sorry it makes you feel uncomfortable. |
Okay, so were all animals and murder is fine-I'll be at your house in about 20 minutes to stab you in the face...... oh wait, no I wont because I'm not immoral.
The point is that just because people have been barbaric in the past dosent justify it for the future.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Comrade Tassadar
|
|
Well obviously. America only annexes nations while the rest of the world conquers them.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
yavoon
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Vesayen
So its okay to kill native americans and steal their land, and the land of mexico and other colonial powers because we need breathing room to expand?
Who else said that? Oh yes, Hitler in Mien Kempf. |
yah we killed and took their land. we weren't very nice about it either. just like slavery its not the most moral spot in history. but if u look at it a little removed its almost an inevitabiliy of the cultural collision. our culture was the more pervasive and dominating.
like said in enter the dragon "how many things have died for want of strength."
|
|
|  |
 |
|
JohnT

|
 |
Capitalist
Mar 1999 time: 00:31
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Osweld
'Civilization' is all about seperating humanity from nature, it says that we've taken control of out 'destiny' and can make our goals what we want. We don't kill people because we're destined to, we kill them because we choose to.
Unless you're saying civilization is a farce. |
No, what I'm saying is that it should neither surprise nor sadden anybody that the structure of human civilization up to this point, including "manifest destiny," bears the very imprint of those behaviors that the previous billions of years of evolution and development has shown us to be successful.
Can we change our behavior now? Sure. Will we? Likely, over time, as technology makes such changes easier on the individual level. But as for the past... to use another analogy, human civilization might, just might be coming out of the toddler era and becoming young children, aware of the rules and doing our best to keep to them, but that cookie jar is just so tempting... 
It's not that we were evil or immoral, we're just highly evolved animals who then were going through yet another massive radical evolutionary process, this time known as the Industrial Revolution. And the Indians weren't. So be it.
Last edited by JohnT on 13-10-2003 at 07:55
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Guynemer
|
|
I don't think anyone is shocked by the behavior of "manifest destiny"... after all, we are animals, and behave as such on a constant basis. It's the term itself, it minimizes what actually happened. It's on par with "collateral damage."
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Vesayen
|
|
quote: Originally posted by St Leo
The point isn't that the land you are living on is stolen. The point is that you can stop the cycle of theft and counter-theft NOW! |
Exactly.... the past dosent matter but we shouldnt lie about it either. Improve the future.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:31. Apolyton Time is 00:31. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|