 |
|
Snotty
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Spiffor
Yep, but the purposeful production of culture within said group, along as the purposeful separation from the rest of society is something I condemn, because it leads people to say "I'm gay" before "I'm French" or "I'm human".
|
Surely the nationalistic desire to say 'Im French' is simply communitarization writ large?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Spiffor
|
 |
CPA - Evil Clone brigade
Nov 2001 time: 06:31
|
|
quote: Originally posted by MrFun
So you're appalled that homosexuals are more comfortable in gay communities?? |
No, I'm appaled some active gays are building a lore for their own separate community, for less active gays to follow.
Let's take an example. I, Spiffor, am a member of the Apolyton community. I normally post several hours a day here. But I don't feel my belonging to Apolyton separates me from the rest of society in any way. I don't fell different from non-Apolytoners in the real world, and I'm keeping my Human and my French identity, that Apolyton is enriching.
Now, if I felt so comfortable on 'Poly that I avoided social relationships in the real world, if I pictured myself as an Apolytoner first, and if I wore Apolyton culture in my everyday (such as wearing Apolytonware; saying "you provide no source, you provide NOTHING !" to my teachers; or dancing the DL dance at parties), I'd think the Apolyton community would be a bad thing for it would be dividing the society.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Spiffor
|
 |
CPA - Evil Clone brigade
Nov 2001 time: 06:31
|
|
quote: Originally posted by chegitz guevara
Groups that seperate themselves typically were seperaqted out unwillingly beforehand. If no one had ever oppressed gays, there would be no gay culture, no gay seperatism, no Castro Street, South Beach, etc. Seperation is an act of self-defense in the face of a large social entity that tells you you're evil. |
I wasn't born at the time where the society was really shunning gays (I don't think the gay marriage issue of today is any close from the situation of 30 years ago, when straight people could go chase and humiliate some gays for the heck of it, and get away with it).
But as far as I understand, the gay culture has begun really being built once it became possible to publicly announce one's gayness. Today, the gays are among the best accepted minority in western countries, yet it is the moment they choose to have "gay-only" conventions (see some Blackice's thread), where gay flags are clearly displayed in the streets etc.
I personally think this doesn't come from oppression, but from a need of feeling elite. Yet again, the university work I just finished today was about the creation of such kind of identities 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MrFun
|
 |
of Iowa
Nov 2000 time: 23:31
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Spiffor
No, I'm appaled some active gays are building a lore for their own separate community, for less active gays to follow.
Let's take an example. I, Spiffor, am a member of the Apolyton community. I normally post several hours a day here. But I don't feel my belonging to Apolyton separates me from the rest of society in any way. I don't fell different from non-Apolytoners in the real world, and I'm keeping my Human and my French identity, that Apolyton is enriching.
Now, if I felt so comfortable on 'Poly that I avoided social relationships in the real world, if I pictured myself as an Apolytoner first, and if I wore Apolyton culture in my everyday (such as wearing Apolytonware; saying "you provide no source, you provide NOTHING !" to my teachers; or dancing the DL dance at parties), I'd think the Apolyton community would be a bad thing for it would be dividing the society. |
I make, and have friends, regardless of sexual orientation.
Yet, at the same time, I support distinctive, residential gay communities in metropolises as a place of positive affirmation, and support networks.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MrFun
|
 |
of Iowa
Nov 2000 time: 23:31
|
|
quote: Originally posted by chegitz guevara
It's more than that. Heterosexist ideologies say that men and women have certain defined roles, and that people who act outside those roles should be punished, supressed, ostracized, etc. Saying that women can't be combat soldiers is an example of heterosexism. Saynig that homosexuality is immoral is an example of heterosexism. Saying boys can't cry is an example of heterosexism.
The reason I think the word is superior to homophobia is a) people aren't afraid of gays and lesbians, and two, it ties the repression of homosexuality into sexism and the whole notion of what "proper" roles are for men and women. Homophobia isn't seperate from sexism, but is an aspect of it. |
I disagree -- heterosexism is not a concept that should replace homophobia.
AND, I disagree, in that many heterosexuals ARE indeed fearful of homosexuals in that they perceive us as setting out to destroy societal values that are anachronistic in today's society.
And a number of closeted homosexuals are homophobic and are fearful of their own sexual orientation and wish to deny or repress it, even through violent means on other homosexuals.
I also disagree with your idea of including gender superiority ideology in the concept of heterosexism, since sexual orientation and gender are two distinct concepts.
Woman and man are gendered concepts -- homosexual and heterosexual are sexaul orientation concepts. Two separate things. Which is why we have the word sexism when concerning gender, and heterosexism when concering sexual orientation.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:31. Apolyton Time is 00:31. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|